Digital Spy Forums

Digital Spy Forums (http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/index.php)
-   Showbiz (http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=101)
-   -   Andy Murray and Kim Sears - Burberry's new mixed doubles team (http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1853295)

FusionFury 14-07-2013 21:49

Andy Murray and Kim Sears - Burberry's new mixed doubles team
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...bles-team.html

Fair play to them cashing on his Wimbledon success.

asyousay 14-07-2013 22:14

That won't happen as Andy as a model is a joke. He is simply not good looking enough to be a model .

Spider Rico 14-07-2013 22:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by asyousay (Post 67085409)
That won't happen as Andy as a model is a joke. He is simply not good looking enough to be a model .

Being 'good looking' isn't always a pre-requisite.

lexi22 14-07-2013 22:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by asyousay (Post 67085409)
That won't happen as Andy as a model is a joke. He is simply not good looking enough to be a model .

He's not becoming a model! It's a branding exercise, and Andy & Kim presumably fit whatever this new Burberry campaign is. It's nothing to do with him being a model, it's about what he represents.

Good luck to them, why not.

Makson 14-07-2013 22:24

I had to laugh at "Andy Murray's chiseled looks" in the article :o
I'm sorry but if the Mail was reporting a story about Marion Bartoli becoming a model for Burberry instead, they'd be without question referring to her as "full-figured" and "curvaceous", not "pretty" or "attractive" anyway.
The double standards are unreal.

earthling13 14-07-2013 22:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by asyousay (Post 67085409)
That won't happen as Andy as a model is a joke. He is simply not good looking enough to be a model .

GQ didn't mind putting him on the cover.

http://blog.aglamslam.com/wp-content...634x812-11.jpg

FusionFury 14-07-2013 22:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by asyousay (Post 67085409)
That won't happen as Andy as a model is a joke. He is simply not good looking enough to be a model .

To be fair, nobody will be looking at Andy ;)

asyousay 15-07-2013 00:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by earthling13 (Post 67086396)
GQ didn't mind putting him on the cover.

http://blog.aglamslam.com/wp-content...634x812-11.jpg

That photo is so airbrushed it does not even look like Andy . So they did a hell of a lot of editing before they let him grace that front cover .

Spider Rico 15-07-2013 00:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by asyousay (Post 67089363)
That photo is so airbrushed it does not even look like Andy . So they did a hell of a lot of editing before they let him grace that front cover .

No more airbrushing than they do with female celebrities......

Bergy87 15-07-2013 00:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by asyousay (Post 67089363)
That photo is so airbrushed it does not even look like Andy . So they did a hell of a lot of editing before they let him grace that front cover .

Looks more like Joey from EastEnders lol!

Shappy 15-07-2013 01:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by asyousay (Post 67089363)
That photo is so airbrushed it does not even look like Andy . So they did a hell of a lot of editing before they let him grace that front cover .

Even air brushed he can't manage to look good-looking! He looks like a character from The Simpsons with overbite.

grimtales1 15-07-2013 07:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by asyousay (Post 67089363)
That photo is so airbrushed it does not even look like Andy . So they did a hell of a lot of editing before they let him grace that front cover .

I have to agree :eek: His face looks like its been chiselled.

earthling13 15-07-2013 07:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by asyousay (Post 67089363)
That photo is so airbrushed it does not even look like Andy . So they did a hell of a lot of editing before they let him grace that front cover .

Gosh! Surely not! Magazine airbrushes pictures? I demand it is closed down immediately!!!! :rolleyes::D

vaslav37 15-07-2013 13:28

Andy is looking sexier than before...

Kim is classed as an English Rose

Best of luck to them...

Viridiana 15-07-2013 13:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shappy (Post 67091093)
Even air brushed he can't manage to look good-looking! He looks like a character from The Simpsons with overbite.

Lol i agree. And so much for we are "private" individuals. Just cash in the relationship like the rest.

Muggsy 15-07-2013 14:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by asyousay (Post 67085409)
That won't happen as Andy as a model is a joke. He is simply not good looking enough to be a model .

Which will be why American Vogue used him way back in 2010. :p

*Sparkle* 15-07-2013 14:52

I can't see this happening.

Both seem really keen that they are not a celeb couple, and that Kim does her own thing, so that goes against it. They both seem to like Burberry, and have been seen wearing their stuff, so I wouldn't be surprised if they get sent a lot- of free stuff. This just sounds like one of those stories that get written when a person is big news, so the papers latch onto half-baked ideas that they know they won't get sued for.

asyousay 15-07-2013 14:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by earthling13 (Post 67093720)
Gosh! Surely not! Magazine airbrushes pictures? I demand it is closed down immediately!!!! :rolleyes::D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Muggsy (Post 67099715)

There is airbrushed and then that. It just looks totally fake as its too "airbrushed" - everything natural has been sucked out of the photo.

Shappy 15-07-2013 16:39

I know Kim is an artist, but is she successful?

Muggsy 15-07-2013 16:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by asyousay (Post 67100644)
There is airbrushed and then that. It just looks totally fake as its too "airbrushed" - everything natural has been sucked out of the photo.

It's Vogue. Of course it's not natural.

Viridiana 15-07-2013 16:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shappy (Post 67102761)
I know Kim is an artist, but is she successful?

She paints portraits of posh people's pets. I've read that they sell for about 1500. Since she knows a lot of rich people, her family is also not exactly poor,I think she has a nice little earner there. But her main job is clearly being a wag.

earthling13 15-07-2013 17:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by asyousay (Post 67100644)
There is airbrushed and then that. It just looks totally fake as its too "airbrushed" - everything natural has been sucked out of the photo.

Of course that very sucessful model really looks like this:

http://emilydaviesviscom.files.wordp...eg?w=396&h=264

And this is?

http://cdn.stylefrizz.com/img/kate-m...-no-makeup.jpg

Viridiana 15-07-2013 17:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by earthling13 (Post 67103743)
Of course that very sucessful model really looks like this:

http://emilydaviesviscom.files.wordp...eg?w=396&h=264

And this is?

http://cdn.stylefrizz.com/img/kate-m...-no-makeup.jpg

That's not fair. Kate Moss is Kate Moss, because she absolutely stunning when she was a young girl, absolutely perfect facial structure, not because she was airbrushed to look stunning.
Now they airbrush her because they still want to have her in their campaigns, because she sells, even though she does not look at all like in the old days.
Murray is just ugly, is not that he was once good looking, is simply a case of trying very hard to simply make him good looking. Not working though.:D

attackmusic 15-07-2013 18:08

I wouldnt call Murray unattractive. He has got better looking and hes got a great body.
Kim is gorgeous :)

milliejo 15-07-2013 18:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Makson (Post 67085790)
I had to laugh at "Andy Murray's chiseled looks" in the article :o
I'm sorry but if the Mail was reporting a story about Marion Bartoli becoming a model for Burberry instead, they'd be without question referring to her as "full-figured" and "curvaceous", not "pretty" or "attractive" anyway.
The double standards are unreal.


And unlikely because she is French...


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45.