View Single Post
Old 08-03-2009, 17:21
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,898
I am only saying one thing is factual...he had child pornography otherwise known as child erotica in his home that was found and introduced as evidence....
But if he had child porn that would warrant a separate charge as well what he went on trial for. If they found that at his home why wasn't he convicted of possession of child pornography (let alone charged)?
JonJonB is offline   Reply With Quote