View Single Post
Old 08-03-2009, 18:14
NovemberMommy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,560
But if he had child porn that would warrant a separate charge as well what he went on trial for. If they found that at his home why wasn't he convicted of possession of child pornography (let alone charged)?
If I remember correctly, it was never proved the people in the porn mags were underage, they looked young but it was never proved they were underage. I think that if they were underage MJ would have definitely been charged with possession child pornography.
NovemberMommy is offline   Reply With Quote