Originally Posted by boddism
As a person who's an uneasy fan of CGI (it drowns out many films, can often be distracting & ruin a film if it looks od or cheap) I found the relative lack of it here refreshing.
But then it didnt have an engrossing story to compensate for its loss.
To me, the glaring lack of CGI just pointed to "smaller budget" IMO
I love these comments because it proves just how ignorant you are about CGI. The film is FULL TO THE BRIM of it! But because its GOOD CGI and does the job its supposed to you can't tell.