That's very true. Judging on rooms, facilities, breakfasts etc makes sense, but the programme is really directed more towards value for money.
Somewhere charging £200 a night is going to have to be extraordinary to be better value for money than a £60 a night establishment.
When I watch. I often think that a place may look great, but do I honestly think its worth double or treble the price an inferior place may be charging.
I guess it would all depend on the circumstances of your stay. Away on business, I'm not going to be around the place a lot, clean and comfortable would be enough. Away for the weekend with my wife, I would be prepared to pay more for a few little luxuries.
Sorry..double post. How do you delete ?
Agreed. Last week's Knock Castle wasn't
worth anything like £200 per night, whereas Satis House was
Both are very expensive (way outside my price range), but I would happily pay £165 to Satis House because I thought the guys who ran it did an excellent job, are clearly customer-focused and the place had the wow factor.
However, generally speaking Ashculme House at £60 per night is more my kind of B&B - and excellent value (despite the lack of tv).