View Single Post
Old 17-02-2013, 11:15
scone
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 12,489
Strictly speaking he wasn't a paedophile because, as I understand it, a paedophile can only be sexually excited when around pre-pubescent children and finds it difficult if not impossible to be attracted to adults, yet he had sexual relationships with people in their 20s and older. Plus there have been allegations of assaults by people as old as in their 40s. Someone suggested a more accurate label would be ephebophile.



Source:- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia
A girl of eight was his youngest victim, paedo not ephebophile
scone is offline Follow this poster on Twitter