View Single Post
Old 17-02-2013, 12:21
Virgil Tracy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,299
Film isnt measured the same, so its stupid to compare. Its also stupid to think "more pixels" means its better. Thats like saying a painting with more paint is better.

Besides, film has a limit imposed by the medium, whilst digital can in theory continue up forever.

Also, you have to consider the point when human eyes can no longer distinguish the difference between the two.

Also, people seem to think a film like "No Country for Old Men" is good because it used film, as though the actors, the story, the director and so on had nothing really to do with the film.

Its not the medium, its the product. This is a REALLY simple concept to understand you know.
I'm not talking about the actors or the story I'm talking about the comparison between film and digital , this is a REALLY simple concept to understand you know.
Virgil Tracy is online now   Reply With Quote