View Single Post
Old 09-03-2013, 12:56
wilehelmas
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,988
Apparently it's not 'morally repugnant' to out someone's sexuality, regardless of what negative effects it may have on their personal life or relationships.

Interesting angle...
Yes because that which you mention (which may or may not be true, false, morally repungant or not) is clearly far worse (and goes on much more) than an entire $$$ industry devoted to inning various highly-paid celebrities, politicians and sports people, so they can live fake lives to earn huge amounts of money based on false images, perpetuating the shame of the closet system.

Who gets paid for speculating someone might be gay? As opposed to actively inning people, requiring whole teams and PR setups to do it.

I know which one I find worse in general. And which one I could live with personally.
wilehelmas is offline   Reply With Quote