So you think that anyone who drinks and drives (but doesn't injure anybody) should be locked up for 5 to 10 years ? Really? Or do you think that only Lyndsay deserves this sort of sentence?
Why should it make any difference if she injures someone? It's her drunk driving that should be the issue. Whether or not anyone is injured really ought to be regarded as a random chance, and shouldn't have any bearing on the sentence. I know it does, but it shouldn't.