Sooo right, glad I am not alone thinking this. I'd hoped that Fiz would stay in jail during the Stape SAGA and her part in covering up for him but no...she was free'd to spoil quality scenes.
hahah, i forgot Fiz was in jail. Oh how id love for stape to come back and take her away.
They carted Kirsty off in the prison van pronto too. What happened to the taped interview, the information gathering, the charge, the court appearence? I think these things take a trifle longer dont they?
Yes. She should have been arrested and taken to the nearest Police custody suite
My view is that Julie tried to do things by the book and be allowed into court to have her say but was refused. I don't imagine Kirsty did the same; there's no evidence that the courtroom door was locked; she knew where it was taking place so presumably could have just barged in to interrupt proceedings!
A defence team would certainly have wanted to call Julie as a witness
I am very much team Ty, but how exactly does Julie being hit prove anything? a) There's nothing to prove it was Julie. b) it doesn't prove that Kirsty was hitting Ty.
It would cast doubt on Kirsty's claim of being non violent
It would cast doubt on Kirsty's claim of being non violent
No it would not, anybody could have hit Julie, she had no witnesses and she did not go to the police to back it up. 5 other people could have gone to the court and said the same thing, but it would have been the same result.
I wish we knew what had to be changed and cut from courtroom stuff but guess we never will!!
I thought Tommy's line "WE won't have to give evidence.." Meaning him and Hayley? Why would Hayley need to give evidence? Presumably a line originally directed to Kev.
Yes. She should have been arrested and taken to the nearest Police custody suite
A defence team would certainly have wanted to call Julie as a witness
It would cast doubt on Kirsty's claim of being non violent
I don't think they would. Julie being hit by Kirsty would make no difference. And it doesn't matter if Kirsty's a violent person or not, sadly in the eyes of the law that isn't proof of guilt. They need ot ascertain whether she hit Tyrone, not whether she has a tendency to or not. Which is why Tina's testimony was rubbish - a lawyer would not be able to bring in the previous feud when Kirsty went into labour as it's irrelevant to the case.
No it would not, anybody could have hit Julie, she had no witnesses and she did not go to the police to back it up. 5 other people could have gone to the court and said the same thing, but it would have been the same result.
Assaults and other things happen all the time without witnesses, people end up doing time without witnesses to the incident.
Nobody witnessed Tyrone battering Kirsty.
OK Julie went to the court first, thinking it would have some influence the case, probably wouldn't at that time, too late in the process.
(I'm guessing the following) A day earlier, then it might have an effect as they could have brought it up in court
I don't think they would. Julie being hit by Kirsty would make no difference. And it doesn't matter if Kirsty's a violent person or not, sadly in the eyes of the law that isn't proof of guilt. They need ot ascertain whether she hit Tyrone, not whether she has a tendency to or not. Which is why Tina's testimony was rubbish - a lawyer would not be able to bring in the previous feud when Kirsty went into labour as it's irrelevant to the case.
So what was Deidre doing there, she didn't see an assault neither did Eileen, in her case she just heard stuff.
Ahh forget it, it's over now, she'll be doing bird and he's out.
Warwick Davis is on.
No it would not, anybody could have hit Julie, she had no witnesses and she did not go to the police to back it up. 5 other people could have gone to the court and said the same thing, but it would have been the same result.
I don't think they would. Julie being hit by Kirsty would make no difference. And it doesn't matter if Kirsty's a violent person or not, sadly in the eyes of the law that isn't proof of guilt. They need ot ascertain whether she hit Tyrone, not whether she has a tendency to or not. Which is why Tina's testimony was rubbish - a lawyer would not be able to bring in the previous feud when Kirsty went into labour as it's irrelevant to the case.
Comments
hahah, i forgot Fiz was in jail. Oh how id love for stape to come back and take her away.
A defence team would certainly have wanted to call Julie as a witness
It would cast doubt on Kirsty's claim of being non violent
No it would not, anybody could have hit Julie, she had no witnesses and she did not go to the police to back it up. 5 other people could have gone to the court and said the same thing, but it would have been the same result.
I thought Tommy's line "WE won't have to give evidence.." Meaning him and Hayley? Why would Hayley need to give evidence? Presumably a line originally directed to Kev.
I don't think they would. Julie being hit by Kirsty would make no difference. And it doesn't matter if Kirsty's a violent person or not, sadly in the eyes of the law that isn't proof of guilt. They need ot ascertain whether she hit Tyrone, not whether she has a tendency to or not. Which is why Tina's testimony was rubbish - a lawyer would not be able to bring in the previous feud when Kirsty went into labour as it's irrelevant to the case.
Assaults and other things happen all the time without witnesses, people end up doing time without witnesses to the incident.
Nobody witnessed Tyrone battering Kirsty.
OK Julie went to the court first, thinking it would have some influence the case, probably wouldn't at that time, too late in the process.
(I'm guessing the following) A day earlier, then it might have an effect as they could have brought it up in court
So what was Deidre doing there, she didn't see an assault neither did Eileen, in her case she just heard stuff.
Ahh forget it, it's over now, she'll be doing bird and he's out.
Warwick Davis is on.
I disagree.
Exactly, but did the defence barrister ask them if they'd actually seen Tyrone hit Kirsty? No..............
"And show your Honor, you see it's true, Tyrone bears no more guilt than you!
Who am I? Kra-zy Kir-sty SOAMES!"
Anyway my team for April is
Craig's Corrie Chums:
Stella (C)
Karl
Dev
Tina
Norris
Eileen
Jason
Lloyd
Katy
Gail
David
How? you might not like it, but it's fact.
Don't mind me just catching up.
Orc more like.
Katy can do better than anyone in Corrie.
Not in this one either.
Hardlly.