View Single Post
Old 04-04-2013, 22:03
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central London
Posts: 36,557
Time for review? any judges out there?

Palace paedo’s 90,000 child abuse pics

no custodial sentence? why?
it's not a victim-less crime, it's actual parcipitation
he admitted he got sexual gratification from it

The most vunerable in society are:
young children
severely disabled people
people of senior age

The punishment must fit the crime
Interesting they called him the Palace Paedo, I suppose to make people think he worked at Buck House and read the article before realising he actually just had the plans to it.
skp20040 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter