Time for review? any judges out there?
Palace paedo’s 90,000 child abuse pics
no custodial sentence? why?
it's not a victim-less crime, it's actual parcipitation
he admitted he got sexual gratification from it
The most vunerable in society are:
severely disabled people
people of senior age
The punishment must fit the crime
Interesting they called him the Palace Paedo, I suppose to make people think he worked at Buck House and read the article before realising he actually just had the plans to it.