Back in March 2010
it was being reported she left £3m
to her sons....my maths may be wrong but £3m - £1m leaves £2m
. or do the papers just make it all up?
Why is The Sun only referring to her income from £2.2m 2006 - 2010, what about the £3m she reportedly earnt from 2002 - 2006, which previously we were told was £8m.
On the 12 Aug 2009 The Sun's
Mike Sullivan and Richard White wrote....
You don't honestly expect the tabloids to do ACTUAL sums do you? It's all about emotive headlines.
Quite simply-if the Estate owes the taxman then they've spent the tax that should have been held in reserve to be paid to the Revenue.
They owe it so what's the problem.