Of course this is an assumption, and goodness knows what they are being taught behind closed doors but I think they could easily fall into the stereotypes of rich peoples children, spoilt and overindulged. One of the most important things I ever learnt was my parents saying no, sure it meant I never got a kids Ferrari or whatever I wanted, but I learnt that if I wanted something I either have to save or work very hard for it. At the time I thought my parents were big meanies but now I realise they just wanted me to learn that things don't come from no where.
I wonder if there is a lot of guilt in the parents, a family member got divorced recently, there was a lot of guilt and she feels she is depriving her daughter of her dad and a normal childhood. To compensate she spoils her daughter terrible and she is become a right little madam. I dread to think what she will be like as a teen.
I agree I think a lot of divorced parents do over indulge their children to help ease any guilt they may feel but my gut feeling tells me the amount of gifts & holidays thrown at J & P has nothing to do with guilt, purely a pathetic attempt at both parents trying to out do each other.
I agree I think a lot of divorced parents do over indulge their children to help ease any guilt they may feel but my gut feeling tells me the amount of gifts & holidays thrown at J & P has nothing to do with guilt, purely a pathetic attempt at both parents trying to out do each other.
A real question... Does Katie take the kids on as many "holidays" as their dad?
I agree I think a lot of divorced parents do over indulge their children to help ease any guilt they may feel but my gut feeling tells me the amount of gifts & holidays thrown at J & P has nothing to do with guilt, purely a pathetic attempt at both parents trying to out do each other.
Interesting point, it wouldn't surprise me that they shower their children in possessions as a way of proving their love. I agree with Betty in that the kids will know this as exploit it for all their worth. IMO BOTH of these two strike me as incredibly materialistic, and value and self worth is valued in money and possessions, to me KP and PA just seem obsessed with what you can buy and own, even if you take away the divorce and z list idiocy I think the kids will still grow up spoilt since these are values the parents will no doubt be passing on
Interesting point, it wouldn't surprise me that they shower their children in possessions as a way of proving their love. I agree with Betty in that the kids will know this as exploit it for all their worth. IMO BOTH of these two strike me as incredibly materialistic, and value and self worth is valued in money and possessions, to me KP and PA just seem obsessed with what you can buy and own, even if you take away the divorce and z list idiocy I think the kids will still grow up spoilt since these are values the parents will no doubt be passing on
It's a shame they can't stop all the mud slinging in the press and realise that money and material goods are not an indicator of love. They won't though - they're both self obsessed morons who put their own image and self interest over everything else.
Ian Hyland seeing straight through PA and his girlfriend
Now the grief angles played out PA announces, just in time for the screening of his next show that hes going to break his silence over KP has he turned to comedy
A real question... Does Katie take the kids on as many "holidays" as their dad?
It's difficult to say since we know longer see the kids on TV with KP but I do get the feeling PA does appear to take them away a lot so at a guess I'd say no.
I really couldn't agree more with Ian Hyland & I think he's hit the nail on the head re Emily loving the cameras.
Say what you want about KP, when she has something to say she does just come out with it regardless if it's a load of b***ocks, whereas slimey Pete & his relentless drip, drip, drip of sly digs IMO is far worse, does he really think we are that naive?
A real question... Does Katie take the kids on as many "holidays" as their dad?
Genuine question but how can Pete take the kids out of school so much? I can't imagine the school letting these kids going on all these holidays during term time
Genuine question but how can Pete take the kids out of school so much? I can't imagine the school letting these kids going on all these holidays during term time
Maybe the school says no but he takes them anyway..
Maybe the school says no but he takes them anyway..
That a really good point, it really will affect their education and at that age education and learning is the most important thing you can do for a young child.
I really couldn't agree more with Ian Hyland & I think he's hit the nail on the head re Emily loving the cameras.
Say what you want about KP, when she has something to say she does just come out with it regardless if it's a load of b***ocks, whereas slimey Pete & his relentless drip, drip, drip of sly digs IMO is far worse, does he really think we are that naive?
Doesn't she just?:rolleyes:
I didn't buy the idea of him and her as a couple from the start, and nothing I've seen so far has made me change my mind.
Can you do that? I had no idea. Even if you could, why? Surely disrupting your child's education means something to him?
Speaking from experience .. We asked school could we take daughter to France..headmaster said no .. We did anyway.. So yes it's possible .. Our headmaster told us even if he says no he can't stop us .
Ian Hyland seeing straight through PA and his girlfriend
Now the grief angles played out PA announces, just in time for the screening of his next show that hes going to break his silence over KP has he turned to comedy
Love Hyland and his latest review.
Watched the show last night. He said he has changed his column and not gossiping so much, but it now reads like an extract from a 10 year old's diary. The TV show is following in the same vein, dull and now full of his time with Emily.
Speaking from experience .. We asked school could we take daughter to France..headmaster said no .. We did anyway.. So yes it's possible .. Our headmaster told us even if he says no he can't stop us .
Ian's not wrong re Emily. She's now central to the 'plot'. And she does seem to be loving it all. It's kind of wierd, like she doesn't realise she's on a trashy reality tv show...?
Watched the show last night. He said he has changed his column and not gossiping so much, but it now reads like an extract from a 10 year old's diary. The TV show is following in the same vein, dull and now full of his time with Emily.
Ian's not wrong re Emily. She's now central to the 'plot'. And she does seem to be loving it all. It's kind of wierd, like she doesn't realise she's on a trashy reality tv show...?
Oh well, her lookout.
Being surrounded by a radioactive cloud of orange has clearly dulled her brain
Comments
I agree I think a lot of divorced parents do over indulge their children to help ease any guilt they may feel but my gut feeling tells me the amount of gifts & holidays thrown at J & P has nothing to do with guilt, purely a pathetic attempt at both parents trying to out do each other.
A real question... Does Katie take the kids on as many "holidays" as their dad?
Interesting point, it wouldn't surprise me that they shower their children in possessions as a way of proving their love. I agree with Betty in that the kids will know this as exploit it for all their worth. IMO BOTH of these two strike me as incredibly materialistic, and value and self worth is valued in money and possessions, to me KP and PA just seem obsessed with what you can buy and own, even if you take away the divorce and z list idiocy I think the kids will still grow up spoilt since these are values the parents will no doubt be passing on
It's a shame they can't stop all the mud slinging in the press and realise that money and material goods are not an indicator of love. They won't though - they're both self obsessed morons who put their own image and self interest over everything else.
Now the grief angles played out PA announces, just in time for the screening of his next show that hes going to break his silence over KP has he turned to comedy
It's difficult to say since we know longer see the kids on TV with KP but I do get the feeling PA does appear to take them away a lot so at a guess I'd say no.
I really couldn't agree more with Ian Hyland & I think he's hit the nail on the head re Emily loving the cameras.
Say what you want about KP, when she has something to say she does just come out with it regardless if it's a load of b***ocks, whereas slimey Pete & his relentless drip, drip, drip of sly digs IMO is far worse, does he really think we are that naive?
Genuine question but how can Pete take the kids out of school so much? I can't imagine the school letting these kids going on all these holidays during term time
Ian, his entire press and Tv career has been a swipe at his ex-wife...do keep up lad!!:D Luv ya for breaking ranks with 'the rest' btw.
Maybe the school says no but he takes them anyway..
That a really good point, it really will affect their education and at that age education and learning is the most important thing you can do for a young child.
Can you do that? I had no idea. Even if you could, why? Surely disrupting your child's education means something to him?
Doesn't she just?:rolleyes:
I didn't buy the idea of him and her as a couple from the start, and nothing I've seen so far has made me change my mind.
Speaking from experience .. We asked school could we take daughter to France..headmaster said no .. We did anyway.. So yes it's possible .. Our headmaster told us even if he says no he can't stop us .
Love Hyland and his latest review.
Watched the show last night. He said he has changed his column and not gossiping so much, but it now reads like an extract from a 10 year old's diary. The TV show is following in the same vein, dull and now full of his time with Emily.
Oh I see, thank you Betty
Ian's not wrong re Emily. She's now central to the 'plot'. And she does seem to be loving it all. It's kind of wierd, like she doesn't realise she's on a trashy reality tv show...?
Oh well, her lookout.
That's an insult to 10yr olds.
Being surrounded by a radioactive cloud of orange has clearly dulled her brain
Have to agree
Was going to say Adrian Mole, but remembered it was the Secret Diary of AM and nothing is secret with Mr. Andre.:D:D
Yes Ive noticed that you do that too never mind