View Single Post
Old 27-04-2013, 10:33
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,936
Hear, hear. Why must alleged victims so often be accused of money-grabbing with no evidence by people trying to take the high moral ground?
The poster has apologised. See below:

Are we allowed to name "he who won't be named" yet? As much as I dislike people's names being banded about the media when we're supposed to presume innocence before guilt, DS is awful if they let forum member's name some of the accused but not others. How is that right in any decent society?

Also, can I apologise for my comments yesterday? In the clear light of day I realise I was being really ignorant and unfairly judgemental towards the victims, which I now feel rather embarrassed about. Sorry to anyone I might have offended.
End-Em-All is offline