View Single Post
Old 02-05-2013, 14:31
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 809
I find it really strange how you keep trying to paint the image that a rapist and child molester who was very likely to be found guilty and who had numerous damning (and apparently corroborating) testimonies to come ahead of him had some sort of attack of conscience by changing his plea after months of lies.
If he had been 40 I can understand him being playing the percentages and pleading for a reduced sentence but this is a 83 year old with a heart condition and I don't see him surviving even a reduced sentence. If he was truly devoid of conscience then he would have taken his chances at trial because even a 1% chance of success is better than nothing.
smc81 is offline   Reply With Quote