The pattern of behaviour in MJ could be said to be inviting young boys over to his house, spending the night, sleeping in one bed, drinking 'Jesus juice' and molesting them.
His former employees are now saying they him having showers and naked pool parties with the boys.
How is that different to the Saville case?
Because Michael Jackson has already been to court over such allegations, and has never been found guilty of anything and was defended
previously by Wade Robson. With Savile, the sheer number of alleged victims across a wide period of time, circumstances and locations indicate that there may be something in it, and supporting statements from other people who had concerns about his behaviour.