Can I ask, where does it say that the person alleging the offence hasnt been interviewed etc?
Its not that I dont beleive you, im more inclined to think, to an extent that lots of people are jumping on a band wagon.
Im am of the opinion that, like many people of the UK probably are, that there is something very very fishy with the whole thing.
Yes, am sure that something has gone on somewhere in the past with maybe one or two individuals. But for so much to come to light now, when frankly most of the accusations will be one word against another?
All very strange
I dont think it says the accusers haven't been interviewed but it says that Jimmy Tarbuck hasn't been.
So anyone can make an allegation no matter how ridiculous, and the accused may be able to disprove it as soon as they are interviewed, but its too late once its been splashed all over the papers and their reputation is destroyed for ever.