Sub £100 camcorder

Comments

• Chris Frost Posts: 11,022

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  28/07/13 - 21:53 #2

  There are lots of different ideas of what constitutes good low light performance. Good low light performance usually means a big lens for gathering lots of light and a large image sensor to convert it to pixels without adding loads of noise. Those are generally features of far more expensive camcorders.
  
  TechRadar did a summary of what it considered to be the best camcorders at the beginning of 2012. You might start with that as a tool for drawing up a short list. LINK
  
  There's other info if you Google: LINK

  0
• evil c Posts: 7,833

  Forum Member

  ✭

  28/07/13 - 22:55 #3

  This Samsung Q10 is good for low light and cheap but still £40 over budget: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Samsung-Q10-Full-HD-Camcorder/dp/B004OVEDZO/ref=sr_1_48?s=photo&ie=UTF8&qid=1375029839&sr=1-48&keywords=camcorders
  
  Pro review: http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/camcorders/1286623/samsung-hmx-q10
  
  Youtube reviews: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXQZ84euV54

  0
• David (2) Posts: 20,632

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  28/07/13 - 23:08 #4

  maybe use a good quality smart phone - you may already have one, to do the job of a cheap camcorder.

  0