Options
Why aren't more episodes set in the future?
ea91
Posts: 2,363
Forum Member
✭✭✭
Is it just me or are too many episodes set in the past/present. All the companions are from the present and just this series we've had a 1970s story, a 1980s story, two Victorian stories and the rest largely set in present day-ish. This is meant to be a sci-fi time travel show, yet it mostly focuses on actual history, what is up with that?
0
Comments
Financially, episodes set in the present/past are cheaper!
But they're less exciting. Old Who managed with a much smaller budget presumably. And I don't think it's even a budget issue, some episodes go all out on the special effects, it's more to do with the writers writing what they know. It seems almost taboo to make assertions about the future at this point, just in case in a hundred years it proves incorrect and that just ends up taking a lot of fun out of the show, I feel.
Of course I'd just like to see a lot more episodes in general though, and would also like more of Earth's past, with historical events happening around the story.
Of course, you could say that every episode we've not seen is 'set' in the future:) hehe
You're fully entitled to your opinion of course, but I'm not sure I agree really. Classic Who managed because I think people suspended their disbelief and utilised their imaginations more. We just weren't used to truly realistic looking visual effects on TV.
As for taboo, perhaps to an extent. Although I read an interview with Gaiman I think it was who said that he'd write a script and it would come back cut to pieces to fit the budget and time. But he,d always write to the fullest. So I don't think writers write with any lack of scale and imagination.
To elaborate on this, I get:
Asylum of the Daleks: future
Dinosaurs on a Spaceship: future
A Town Called Mercy: past
The Power of Three: present
The Angels Take Manhattan: past
The Snowmen: past
The Bells of Saint John: present
The Rings of Akhatan: future
Cold War: past
Hide: past
Journey...: future
So that's:
- four future
- five past
- two present
If we're going to lump two categories together to make the third look bad, why not say there aren't enough stories set in the present?I don't really have a strong preference tbh. I do like futuristic ones slightly more. As long as the story is good it doesn't bother me. And I maintain that the period should not affect the excitement of the episode.
Just a thought
Jack is from the future
Though due to been sent back to far also from the past and present
Unless they make the sets out of glue,washing up liquid bottles and egg cartons like in the good old days when stories mattered.
When the future was a quarry.
Cool, will have to check them out. Speaking of non-TV Who, my favourite BIG Finish stories are the 8th Doctor Episodes set in the Universe without time. Very futuristic, very sci-fi and alien.
Past: 30.6%
Present: 34.1%
Future: 30.6%
Unknown: 4.7%
That's a pretty even split, to be fair.
Here's the thing, though. Sometimes, episodes are set in the future purely to allow the premise.
If you're going to have a story about human colonists on a spaceship, or about the end of the world, or man's exploration of other planets, then by definition they have to be set in the future. But the story itself may end up being fairly timeless ... e.g. Midnight is set in the future, but that's just to set the scene - it could just as easily have been set in any closed vehicle in any inhospitable environment in any time.
The other problem with future episodes (and I say this as someone who also enjoys them) is that they don't give viewers something as recognisable to identify with. Historical and present episodes are fun because we get to put the Doctor into settings/events that we know about, and then play with that, e.g. his interactions with Shakespeare in The Shakespeare Code, etc.
It's more fun to believe that the Doctor influenced a past event than it is to imagine that he will influence an event which a writer has forseen.
i think we've had a really good spread this series
I was going to say something very similar, but far less eloquent. As much as we're excited by the prospect of the future, its intangible and kind of unrelatable. Whereas, we all can recognise bits from the past and feel comfortable that we understand social norms and the like. That's not to say there shouldn't be (or even that they're aren't) future episodes, but maybe its a bit of memory bias happening. We know the past, therefore those episodes stick more readily than the future episodes where we weren't entirely at ease with the world. Or some such...:p
I thought that was set in the present?
I'd assume the same holds true, more or less, today.
Dinosaurs on a Spaceship: no ghosts
A Town Called Mercy: no ghosts
The Power of Three: no ghosts
The Angels Take Manhattan: no ghosts
The Snowmen: ghosts
The Bells of Saint John: no ghosts
The Rings of Akhatan: no ghosts
Cold War: no ghosts
Hide: ghosts
Journey...: no ghosts
So that's:
There aren't enough stories with ghosts. Doctor who should be more about ghosts:D
Subverted in a good way in A Christmas Carol - although it's an alien world with alien clouds and fish and freezer technology, we can get a grasp on the characters due to the old-timey feel.
Future/space stories are good for setting up unusual situations and telling a story within that new framework, while past stories are great for taking normal expectations and turning them on their heads.
Still, we used to have companions from the future (Steven, Zoe, Leela, K9, Romana, Adric, Turlough, Nyssa...)