The Daily Pwice

17475777980200

Comments

  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    So you've just admitted that you never watched Standing up for Harvey...but were able to say to me that NO SPECIALISTS spoke specifically about Harvey and his disabilities within that programme.....gosh what powers you have there...:eek: and you expect people here to believe other claims you make. So you are NOT in any position to pass any comment about this programme...as by your own admission you didn't watch it.

    You stated here several times that YOU did NOT belong to Twitter....you said it, not me. So no need to "delving & scrabbling frantically for 'evidence" as you put it soooo charmingly and succinctly. The "evidence" (to quote you again) is all over these pages. So you've joined several times then.....To quote you again "Yep....and I did join again"

    Oh.....I did struggle, but didn't give in to highlight my comments in pink.....much nicer shade than angry red I always think ;)

    Stop angling for my new twitter account user name VV. You can't follow me .My account is locked;)
    Re you not believing anything I say. Devastated,but I'll get over it in time I'm sure.
    As for Pwicey's "poor me" prog on H....no,never watched it & never will,but it won't stop me labeling it a publicity stunt designed to glorify herself into a Mother Theresa figure. Epic fail. As she would say "it is wha' it is"......a publicity stunt to clean up her smutty image that failed.
    I'm perplexed that you find the red highlighting angry VV since there is no choice of other colours available:confused: Had you used the quote system in the proper way with quotes in the boxes in your post then I wouldn't have needed the highlighting facility to make my words evident as MY words rather than yours in the reply.
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    Supercell wrote: »
    ....but if she only booked it 2 weeks ago then maybe that's all she could get at short notice!
    Could be. But there was no need to make it so soon anyway. She could have waited till after the birth & gone to town on it then. Or maybe she might not be with Kev/Keith then. Once the baby arrives K/K will be excess baggage after the initial "happy Family" photo shoots cheques are cashed safely.
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    Kay2000 wrote: »
    So why do you just not spill :confused: as i am interested in what you think you know :D
    He doesn't know anything kay.
    In fact I'd say YOU know more than he does.
    It's like Nev on Twitter.....lots of hints and lapping up the attention & "do tell!"s,but no facts .
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    Kay2000 wrote: »
    London Marathon didn't look like a lot of connectivity going on then, i think the trip alone Katie took, from the USA may hold something important ;) I also am confident in things that i know ;);) Those poor freelancers, still having to wait for what they owed :cry:
    Yep,a bit scummy not paying people,but there you go,some people live high on the hog & post pics in exotic locations as their avatars ,but screw the little guys to pay for it all. No principles.
  • Kay2000Kay2000 Posts: 3,906
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    He doesn't know anything kay.
    In fact I'd say YOU know more than he does.
    It's like Nev on Twitter.....lots of hints and lapping up the attention & "do tell!"s,but no facts .

    Seems to have lost his tongue regards the freelancers :D
  • fredsterfredster Posts: 31,802
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    The Bridal Suite.
    Not that posh. Perhaps she's not as rich as we thought?

    http://www.rookery-manor.co.uk/wedding-venues-somerset/bridal-guest-accommodation

    There are some very nice hotels in WSM. They probably did not want her wedding . Is some magazine stupid enough to be paying for her wedding .....again?
  • Cyril_SneerCyril_Sneer Posts: 2,314
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Kay2000 wrote: »
    London Marathon didn't look like a lot of connectivity going on then, i think the trip alone Katie took, from the USA may hold something important ;) I also am confident in things that i know ;);) Those poor freelancers, still having to wait for what they owed :cry:

    Agree totally, i think from what you say you are ahem, very right to be confident on that score ;)

    To be honest, CP and KP very alike in some ways, maybe that was half the problem.

    I really doubt either would want people on forums basically trying to make out either are that bad parents, or using a scripted TV show to judge them, but then thats the nature of the business, and they have both used it to their advantage at times. If it was that bad, they wouldnt be in constant communication. Obviously people dont see a lot of the real stuff on TV so they dont know, my problem isn't really with either of them, although again both have done some pretty questionable things, its more how some things were handled by others for their own motives and who went along with it.

    As for the freelancers, they should be paid if they havent. Not good.

    :)
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    Kay2000 wrote: »
    Seems to have lost his tongue regards the freelancers :D

    :D:D:D

    Any pics of the wedding dress yet ?
  • Kay2000Kay2000 Posts: 3,906
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    :D:D:D

    Any pics of the wedding dress yet ?

    Not that i have seen, but i have not been looking tbh
  • Cyril_SneerCyril_Sneer Posts: 2,314
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    He doesn't know anything kay.
    In fact I'd say YOU know more than he does.
    It's like Nev on Twitter.....lots of hints and lapping up the attention & "do tell!"s,but no facts .

    Oh yeah course, cos Nev wouldn't know anything about them would he. How many years was he with them? You make completely no sense whatsoever.

    Didn't you admit to watching a Kate sex tape a few pages back? Sorry to say don't think she's into women though. ;)
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    The bridesmaids looked ok ,so you never know,my prediction of something plain but classical might be correct.:rolleyes:
    Right.......I'm off to twitter to take the pee. Catch you later.
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    Oh yeah course, cos Nev wouldn't know anything about them would he. How many years was he with them? You make completely no sense whatsoever.

    Didn't you admit to watching a Kate sex tape a few pages back? Sorry to say don't think she's into women though. ;)

    Yes. I watched her tape. But calling it a sex tape goes against the trades description act. They both looked bored. Well they would. They didn't have much to work with really. Must be the only tape like that where the female pulls knickers from her bag & puts them on.:rolleyes:
  • Kay2000Kay2000 Posts: 3,906
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    Yes. I watched her tape. But calling it a sex tape goes against the trades description act. They both looked bored. Well they would. They didn't have much to work with really. Must be the only tape like that where the female pulls knickers from her bag & puts them on.:rolleyes:

    :D:D:D:D:D
  • Cyril_SneerCyril_Sneer Posts: 2,314
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    Yes. I watched her tape. But calling it a sex tape goes against the trades description act. They both looked bored. Well they would. They didn't have much to work with really. Must be the only tape like that where the female pulls knickers from her bag & puts them on.:rolleyes:

    Well whatever floats your boat eh ;)
  • KayteJKayteJ Posts: 157
    Forum Member
    janna wrote: »
    Yes. I watched her tape. But calling it a sex tape goes against the trades description act. They both looked bored. Well they would. They didn't have much to work with really. Must be the only tape like that where the female pulls knickers from her bag & puts them on.:rolleyes:

    :D:D:D
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    Well whatever floats your boat eh ;)
    Well "floats your boat" hardly applies in the case of this tape. A bit of enthusiasm might have helped.
    I have the link .I'll PM it to you since you seem keen.:)
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    KayteJ wrote: »
    :D:D:D
    You think I'm joking ?
    I'm not. Honestly.:)
  • Cyril_SneerCyril_Sneer Posts: 2,314
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    Well "floats your boat" hardly applies in the case of this tape. A bit of enthusiasm might have helped.
    I have the link .I'll PM it to you since you seem keen.:)

    It's ok hun, i wouldn't embarrass myself admitting something like that in public. ;)
  • KayteJKayteJ Posts: 157
    Forum Member
    janna wrote: »
    You think I'm joking ?
    I'm not. Honestly.:)

    I've seen the video and know you're not joking..it's the way you said it :D:D
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    It's ok hun, i wouldn't embarrass myself admitting something like that in public. ;)

    Awe don't be embarrassed . It's just impersonal (very impersonal) sex is all. You like her,so you'll love this. Anyway nothing we haven't seen in stills of her & not remotely kinky.
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    KayteJ wrote: »
    I've seen the video and know you're not joking..it's the way you said it :D:D

    HOW COULD YOU ADMIT THAT IN PUBLIC ?:eek:

    Oh well. Time to lock on my chastity belt for the night & cover some exposed chair legs in case they excite anyone.
    See ya ......:)
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,834
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    No, i would have said getting AWAY from her was pretty well planned and executed though.

    Them getting together was definitely not pre-planned

    Now I would say I am neither gullible or naive... and I absolutely have no 'insider' knowledge.. but here are a few things I have observed about KP/PA.

    1. Neither of them can act... place them in a room of mahogany and it is the wood that would shine.

    2. They were a terrible combination of insecure jealousy... the failure of their relationship was not surprising since neither of them trusted the other from the beginning.

    3.KP is in abusive baggage and the people who tolerate her nasty remarks and behaviour do not have my sympathy for the way she talks to them... tell her to treat you with respect or **** off it isn't rocket science. PA is a passive aggressive tit and a sulker to boot... is there a worse combination of personality's in a relationship?

    3. Having said that... both of them showed imo genuine signs of distress when each of them realised the relationship was over... they just didn't realise at the same time... apart from the fact neither of them are smart enough to keep it up... one of them would have leaked that for sure just excluding the fact they were in on it.

    4. I might buy the split was capitalised on but planned by KP and PA?.. never going to sell me that pile of poop... I believe the management of CAN... CP/NH did everything they could to keep PA away from KP after the split because they knew she would boot them both out the door if she got PA to take her back... her drunken voice mails that were made public do not speak to me of a woman who had already shed the ex before the official split... neither does the massive weight loss of PA.

    5. I have always said KP/CP are the same personality... alpha females, competitive, vindictive... both of them got involved with weaker men who both whinged about them getting involved with other men... as far as I know CP doesn't change her men as often as her knickers so why NH ever thought her relationship was his business I don't know... I don't think KP would have gone to court again if not encouraged by NH and her own absolute belief she is never wrong so someone must have smeared her... but having said that she seems to be smart enough to use him for info and keep him out of her life and business.
  • Mr DangerousMr Dangerous Posts: 902
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    Yes. I watched her tape. But calling it a sex tape goes against the trades description act. They both looked bored. Well they would. They didn't have much to work with really. Must be the only tape like that where the female pulls knickers from her bag & puts them on.:rolleyes:

    plus she needs a sex toy as well.....yes I've seen it, just for giggles.....
  • BadcatBadcat Posts: 3,684
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    plus she needs a sex toy as well.....yes I've seen it, just for giggles.....

    I must admit I googled it and watched it. I laughed so hard I snorted tea out my nose.

    OMG.. worse. sex. tape. ever! I actually thought my sound had gone because they were so quiet.

    It should be shown as a warning to those thinking of entering the sex industry as a guide to "how NOT to do a sex tape".

    I haven't laughed so much for ages and in no way is it a turn on.

    IN fact I was only really focusing on one bit of her anatomy and it was "god her tum is QUITE big... was she pregnant when they did this or had she just eaten loads of pies before filming that?"

    also stiff willies always look so funny LMAO! :D
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,540
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Badcat wrote: »
    I must admit I googled it and watched it. I laughed so hard I snorted tea out my nose.

    OMG.. worse. sex. tape. ever! I actually thought my sound had gone because they were so quiet.

    It should be shown as a warning to those thinking of entering the sex industry as a guide to "how NOT to do a sex tape".

    I haven't laughed so much for ages and in no way is it a turn on.

    IN fact I was only really focusing on one bit of her anatomy and it was "god her tum is QUITE big... was she pregnant when they did this or had she just eaten loads of pies before filming that?"

    also stiff willies always look so funny LMAO! :D

    I'm gonna have to look at this video..never seen it yet for fear of vomiting syndrome.
This discussion has been closed.