Options

Firefox 22 Out.

koantemplationkoantemplation Posts: 101,293
Forum Member
✭✭✭✭
Party time!!!!
«1

Comments

  • Options
    flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    balls i forgot to start a thread about this.

    as someone who has been using 22 for 6 weeks i can confirm it is the same as 21.

    well it supports WebRTC on by default. but since you don't know what that is it wont affect you.
  • Options
    wiltwilt Posts: 978
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    And even if you do know what it is - it wont affect you.
  • Options
    OrbitalzoneOrbitalzone Posts: 12,627
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Well as long as it does the occasional crash for no apparent reason then I'll be happy to continue to use it :P
  • Options
    wavy-davywavy-davy Posts: 7,122
    Forum Member
    I've just had a special celebratory meal of sausage and mash to celebrate. (Typing this in Chrome btw)..
  • Options
    cnbcwatchercnbcwatcher Posts: 56,681
    Forum Member
    I've just opened a can of diet coke and I have a music channel on the TV now to celebrate. Gonna be a good night :D
  • Options
    flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    23 is going to blow your mind. they've moved the bookmarks button. it's crazy.
  • Options
    koantemplationkoantemplation Posts: 101,293
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    flagpole wrote: »
    23 is going to blow your mind. they've moved the bookmarks button. it's crazy.

    Nooooo!!!!!

    <falls down on knees>

    You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!


    I liked the bookmarks button where it is.
  • Options
    flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    oh shit. they have slightly changed the icon.
  • Options
    alanwarwicalanwarwic Posts: 28,396
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Seems Firefox are trying to move the web forward.

    That ability to run compiled web apps could end up being a big positive for the web. Chrome only does JIT. Safari also does KIT but even that is barred from being used for web apps.
    I'm not sure what IE does but my cynical mind tells me Microsoft wants out privacy to be an app store based one.

    Whilst we effectively lost that Open Screen Project, no doubt due to strong pressure from Microsoft, it is good to actually see some stuff still developing for the web..
  • Options
    albertdalbertd Posts: 14,360
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    On installing V22, will it revert to not loading some plugins like Windows Media Player, which is used by some public webcams around the net?

    That is what happened when I installed V21.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    Forum Member
    The slingplayer plugin is not working with v22
    Just hangs the browser.

    Never had a problem with this plugin before.
  • Options
    NewWorldManNewWorldMan Posts: 4,908
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Has anyone run into this JavaScript error after updating to 22?

    "Illegal operation on WrappedNative prototype object"

    Get it on start-up and new pages. Have to keep clicking OK until it goes away. Haven’t pinned it down yet. It’s fine with all extensions disabled. I re-enabled all my most commonly used extensions but haven't reproduced the problem yet.

    I will re-enable the others as and when needed. Then presumably at some point the error will be triggered.
  • Options
    alanwarwicalanwarwic Posts: 28,396
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Firefox wins out at Tomshardware, ahead of Chrome and Opera Next.

    Even with much of IE 10 being built into and loading when Windows starts, IE comes nowhere.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/chrome-27-firefox-21-opera-next,3534-12.html
  • Options
    Marti SMarti S Posts: 5,789
    Forum Member
    Anyone who has an an old PC like myself may want to hold fire upgrading, 22 seems very cpu intensive at times even when its sitting idle, also pages seem slower to load than 21
  • Options
    Marti SMarti S Posts: 5,789
    Forum Member
    Found some other bugs in 22, saving to wrong folder and breaks tab utilities pre4.

    This is the worst update for a while, should still be in beta, gone back to 21
  • Options
    cnbcwatchercnbcwatcher Posts: 56,681
    Forum Member
    I haven't upgraded yet and I don't think I will until all the known problems are out. I'm even finding 21 a bit of a RAM hog and I'm not using an old computer.
  • Options
    koantemplationkoantemplation Posts: 101,293
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭✭
    No problems with 22 here. But then I only really download and surf, nothing too complex.

    Just the 'first run shockwave flash' problem, where when you first run Firefox, after booting or rebooting, it Flash hangs for ages.

    But once it has run, it works OK until the next reboot.
  • Options
    GortGort Posts: 7,467
    Forum Member
    Marti S wrote: »
    Anyone who has an an old PC like myself may want to hold fire upgrading, 22 seems very cpu intensive at times even when its sitting idle, also pages seem slower to load than 21

    I'm using a P4 with 1GB of RAM that I've owned since 2003 as my main machine, and Firefox 22 is working fine on it with less than 1% CPU when idle. Still, this is on Linux, so maybe it's different on whatever you might have. I'm not saying your problems are imaginary, but they're not what I'm experiencing on this old machine.
  • Options
    wiltwilt Posts: 978
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Not had any problems with 22 myself, no catastrophic bugs or load issues. Using on both Linux and Windows.
  • Options
    alanwarwicalanwarwic Posts: 28,396
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    To me it sounds a big step forward for the web.

    Fast compiled web apps will certainly give encouragement to web development.
  • Options
    alanwarwicalanwarwic Posts: 28,396
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    A short synopsis of the new 'King of the new hill'.

    http://www.osnews.com/story/27161/Firefox_22_is_the_new_king_of_the_hill

    Interesting that WebGL in Chrome is rated as bad.
  • Options
    noise747noise747 Posts: 30,854
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    alanwarwic wrote: »
    To me it sounds a big step forward for the web.

    Fast compiled web apps will certainly give encouragement to web development.

    Am I missing something, Is that more of a security risk and also why are they required?


    Anyway it have to be supported by other browsers as well.
  • Options
    alanwarwicalanwarwic Posts: 28,396
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    noise747 wrote: »
    Am I missing something, Is that more of a security risk and also why are they required?
    Probably far less so than any 40% surcharged app.

    Obviously there will be plenty of big money marketing to tell us otherwise.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    Forum Member
    For those using a slingbox, Sling have now fixed their sling watch addon and it works now in v22.
    I had to use chrome for a while just to watch the slingplayer, glad to have firefox back for that.
  • Options
    Marti SMarti S Posts: 5,789
    Forum Member
    lettice wrote: »
    For those using a slingbox, Sling have now fixed their sling watch addon and it works now in v22.
    I had to use chrome for a while just to watch the slingplayer, glad to have firefox back for that.

    Maybe only for a month when they release 23 and it breaks god knows what again.

    These rapid release cycles are too much bother, always one add-on or another breaks each time. I should think the add-on developers are getting pissed off with it.
Sign In or Register to comment.