So the cowardly (and fairly thick!) scots
lad went home with twelve and a half
grand,having only 'earned' one grand
in his cash builder round;and then been
so cowardly as to take two thousand from
his team mates in order to survive!
I say (as have others on here) that he should
be 'deducted' the two grand he sacrificed,and
it be shared among the more deserving team
members,who actually EARNED it!
It doesn't sound like a nice word, so I agree. It reminds me of the word "putrid" which isn't very nice either.
It reminds me of the word "Punk"
For some reason, I always thought the word "punk" meant "rotten wood" or something similar. I wonder where I got THAT from ??:D
Wasn't it CHAD who peered over walls in graffiti ? NOT Kilroy
Never heard of Chad, certainly heard of Kilroy was here. Londoner.
-
To be fair to that Scottish guy on this occasion, he did at least answer a couple of questions in the final chase and added his own place so his 3 steps would have made a difference.
So the cowardly (and fairly thick!) scots
lad went home with twelve and a half
grand,having only 'earned' one grand
in his cash builder round;and then been
so cowardly as to take two thousand from
his team mates in order to survive!
I say (as have others on here) that he should
be 'deducted' the two grand he sacrificed,and
it be shared among the more deserving team
members,who actually EARNED it!
I'd watch that final chase again. Without his answers , Mark would have won.
So the cowardly (and fairly thick!) scots
lad went home with twelve and a half
grand,having only 'earned' one grand
in his cash builder round;and then been
so cowardly as to take two thousand from
his team mates in order to survive!
I say (as have others on here) that he should
be 'deducted' the two grand he sacrificed,and
it be shared among the more deserving team
members,who actually EARNED it!
I actually couldn't agree more with this! I hate when people take a minus offer. Lower offer yes but hate people riding on the coat tails of the contestants who done most of the work and having the cheek to take money off them to do so!
Comments
Yes. You're right. I remember it well.
Apparently, the Kilroy version is american.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=chad
It was always 'Kilroy was here' that I knew, certainly in Scotland
Maybe regional variations?
lad went home with twelve and a half
grand,having only 'earned' one grand
in his cash builder round;and then been
so cowardly as to take two thousand from
his team mates in order to survive!
I say (as have others on here) that he should
be 'deducted' the two grand he sacrificed,and
it be shared among the more deserving team
members,who actually EARNED it!
Well at least it takes a bit of the pressure of Shaun a bit when it comes to Chaser defeats...
It doesn't sound like a nice word, so I agree. It reminds me of the word "putrid" which isn't very nice either.
It reminds me of the word "Punk"
For some reason, I always thought the word "punk" meant "rotten wood" or something similar. I wonder where I got THAT from ??:D
Never heard of Chad, certainly heard of Kilroy was here. Londoner.
-
To be fair to that Scottish guy on this occasion, he did at least answer a couple of questions in the final chase and added his own place so his 3 steps would have made a difference.
I'd watch that final chase again. Without his answers , Mark would have won.
I actually couldn't agree more with this! I hate when people take a minus offer. Lower offer yes but hate people riding on the coat tails of the contestants who done most of the work and having the cheek to take money off them to do so!
Looking forward to see how the Beast does on the US version of the show