Valeyard theory/question
[Deleted User]
Posts: 1,273
Forum Member
✭✭✭
Ok, so I'm wondering where I would be able to view The Trial of the Time Lord story (from the start) so I can see the whole Valeyard story myself so I can form a more accurate theory about who John Hurt might be.
I'm one of those who subscribe to the Valeyard theory and so want to see those episodes so I understand that better. Sure I'm not old enough to have seen old who and I haven't made a big effort to watch them but I do want to catch up with this story line in particular. :cool:
I'm one of those who subscribe to the Valeyard theory and so want to see those episodes so I understand that better. Sure I'm not old enough to have seen old who and I haven't made a big effort to watch them but I do want to catch up with this story line in particular. :cool:
0
Comments
The Valeyard was supposed to be the final regeneration of the Doctor, bitter and scared of dying, as written by one of the best Who writers, Robert Holmes. Alas producer John Nathan-Turner got cold feet on the idea and it was changed to the Valeyard being an amalgamation of the darker aspects of the Doctor's personality between the 12th and 13th Doctor. And if that sounds like nonsense, it's because it is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_Q1g7mpcMw
Not that I know for sure but it looks like this might be from The Trial of the Timelord episode. Never seen it myself.
The Master: "They made a deal with The Valeyard, or as I've always known him, The Doctor"
The Doctor: (Looking a bit taken aback) "Did you call him....The Doctor?"
Which is interesting in respect to the dispute Doctor 11 had about 'The Name of The Doctor' in the previous episode.
To some it may appear that the name of The Doctor is a matter of perspective. Which was alluded towards in the previous episode by The Great Intelligence.
But when the Matt Smith Doctor said that the John Hurt Doctor was/is him, could he not be referring directly to the episode Trial of the Timelord?
Not a future Doctor, not Doctor Zero, not Doctor 8-9, but The Valeyard from Trial of the Timelord?
That would work wouldn't it?
Of course as this show is about time travel, to further muddy the waters, I guess he could be The Valeyard AND be a Doctor 8-9 who was responsible for what happened in the Time War. Those two things don't need to be mutually exclusive from each other.
Or he could be The Valeyard AND Doctor Zero in theory.
Or The Valeyard AND a future Doctor.
Or The Valeyard AND all three of the above.:D
That's interesting. That's new to me.
They may quite possibly go with that untold story over the amalgamation idea depicted in the Trial of The Timelord story.
Whilst that is admirable I have neither the time or patience to do so, whether or not it is very good is despite the point I want to see it more because it directly affects theories on who Hurt is ergo I want to see it so I can make fair judgement on my own about these theories.
So basicly if you go by old who its not likely Hunt is the Valeyard, but anything is possible in the 2005 series or even just if the change the head writer. I'm sorry but doctor who's canon is far from consistent. I guess 50 years of a show about time travel will do that..
Most war leaders say that they go to war in the name of peace.
George W Bush said the same.
Why does it?
I really don't understand this at all when people say this.
We come in peace, shoot to kill - Capt Kirk (Star Trekin)
Well, how can you break a promise you haven't made?
But why is it assumed that he didn't make it?
Surely the opposite assumption should be that he did make the promise if he went on to break it?
I actually enjoyed Trial of a Time Lord much more than the previous season. Terror of the Vervoids is my favourite Colin Baker story and the other stories weren't bad.
In the end, the Valeyard loses all his potential and becomes a bog standard pantomime villain complete with evil laugh.
I'd say it's far from bad, but if you want to watch some great Classic Who, you're best starting off with a different season.
The Valeyard is one Theory.... however, given that Souffle Girl entered the timeline of Matt Smith's Doctor (ignoring the fact that the 2005+ series remains non canon to the original series), in a premise remarkably similar to Sam Beckett entering the Quantum Leap Accelerator, it is also quite possible that John Hurts character is entirely separate to The Valeyard.
For example - if the issue of "The Promise" is significant, then one issue which could arise would be (for example) one Time Lord agreeing not to enter the timeline of any other Time Lord through entering their tomb.Rassilon would certainly ignore such a promise, as would Omega, and possibly Pthyia.
That's an interesting thought. Clara and The Doctor went into The Doctor's timestream, and both eventually landed in that...place. Whatever that place is.
So would it be logical to speculate that the John Hurt Doctor also entered the timestream for him too to also end up there? Seeing as they're the only three people there, and both Clara and The Doctor are there because they entered the timestream. Surely that might suggest that the John Hurt Doctor also entered that timestream from the same place that they did?
I'm not saying that he did enter the timestream just like Clara and The Doctor did, but it would be a logical assumption to make wouldn't it?
That may be why Clara never saw him in the timestream in the same way in which she saw all the other Doctors. Because the John Hurt Doctor entered the timestream in exactly the same way that she did and wasn't already in it like the other 11 Doctors were.
But the promise was the name.
It wasn't a 'place' it was 'the whole of the Doctor's life'; they didn't 'end up in the same place' but the Doctor sought out Clara to save her. Of course, that doesn't explain entirely why the JH 'Doctor' was there - or does it? Surely the only reason this other form was brought to mind was because the Doctor was conscious - massively so - that somewhere here was bound to be that figure.
Having just watched the Trial clip for the first time since I paid no attention to the script, I'm fairly sure that Moffatt could, and would, use that exchange between the Doctor and the Master to build new conflicts. The Valyard is know to 11 because he remembers what 6 heard. He knows that between 12 and 13, the dark side of his character will, eventually, do great evil. For me, it was one of the reason for tears this past episode; he can't avoid that eventuality.
But I dare say that meeting the incarnation who did wrong 'Not in the Name of the Doctor' will, in time, help him cope.
So, I don't get your point?
He made a promise and he broke it.
The only reason I can see why he couldn't make the promise is if it was explicitly stated somewhere that the William Hartnell Doctor was the very first one to make that promise.
And even then, people are saying he made the promise, and the promise is the name, 'The Doctor'.
What does that even mean? It doesn't even make grammatical sense, so I really don't understand what some people are getting at.
Yes, I know that 'The Doctor' is supposed to mean that he is expected to uphold good intentions and do good things, but the words 'The Doctor' is a promise in itself? How?
From the information provided to us in the episode there has been no real context given of the background to this promise. So I don't get this notion that the John Hurt couldn't have made the promise or be a Doctor Zero before Hartnell.
I really don't.
On this little thing I'm not seeing people elaborate on what they actually mean. People are just saying that "he couldn't make the promise because the promise is the name".
I honestly don't understand what that means.
You must be gutted.
Surely it must be getting really difficult to maintain that fiction in the face of last week's events?
Picking up on this debate. There are 11 Doctors, because (at least as far as I read into it) John Hurt's incarnation broke the promise that the name Doctor means. Whilst it is unlikely that he is Doctor Zero, I still think it's possible. After all, he could just as easily take the name and then break the promise the same as any other incarnation could have. If he is an incarnation of the Doctor, I doubt he would've broken the promise without a good reason. I also doubt it is the 9th, because the Doctor is very open about The Time War and it is also a secret he has been running from his whole life. Also, the way 11 says "I know" implies that JH did in fact have no choice.
That's how I see it too. He makes the promise, then later breaks it. I don't see how that's an issue whatever Doctor he was.
If it's the 'name' of The Doctor which is the issue then I don't think that's the point. That's a perspective issue about whether The Doctor thinks he's worthy of the name or not. The point is whether he's a manifestation of the same entity we know as the Doctor.
Like you I don't necessarily stand by the theory that he is a Doctor Zero, I just think it's worth considering as an option for now.
In 'The Three Doctors' it was explicitly stated that the Hartnell Doctor was the first Doctor.
Also in 'The Five Doctors' the first Doctor stated himself that he was the first - "The original, you might say".
Of course that could mean that he was simply the first incarnation of that time lord to use the name Doctor. But any previous incarnation would then not be called 'the Doctor' so could not break the promise.
The promise is what your intentions are when you take on the name. You can't break a promise you haven't yet made.