Options
Kay Burley - please enlighten me !!
[Deleted User]
Posts: 2,376
Forum Member
✭✭✭
I'm presuming she is Sky's favourite presenter as it seems that everytime I switch on Sky News it seems that she's on duty , usually the studio but if there's a it story she's out on location.
Just don't get it .
She has a way of delivering the news which grates on me personally and doesn't seem that outstanding to me , she hardly smiles and when she does, its a fake one .
She's far from attractive ( take a close look and imagine her without makeup first thing in the morning - yikes !) .
Any theories out there as to why she's the golden girl of Sky and better keep them clean
Just don't get it .
She has a way of delivering the news which grates on me personally and doesn't seem that outstanding to me , she hardly smiles and when she does, its a fake one .
She's far from attractive ( take a close look and imagine her without makeup first thing in the morning - yikes !) .
Any theories out there as to why she's the golden girl of Sky and better keep them clean
0
Comments
Fancy a bit of Kay Burley's best bits:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnj2M28pDi0
how could you say such a thing?
..she also works for LBC which is nothing to do with NewsCorp.
you served an ace
auto cutie who cares little or nothing about the news
Thank you:eek:
And who thinks that she is "it"
I have heard that's a bit of a myth and have seen no evidence backing this one up. Would be good to see a video proving it.
She isn't always on it's always Lorna Dunkley on afternoons when I see it and she doesn't do any other slot except Christmas Day morning so how is she always on.
To the person who said she is on LBC she did a one off show at Christmas.
Well she certainly doesn't enlighten me!
Ha Ha Ha, best joke I have heard all year.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpQX_ZWinas
Dreadful woman.
So determined to get her interviewees to say what she wants them to, she doesn't bother to listen to the answers orr isn't bright enough to understand them.
I think you're absolutely spot on. Her intellect shines like a beacon. Why, only the other week when Richard III's bones were being paraded around, she was asking some Tudor expert if Henry VII put pressure on Shakespeare to besmirch the old hunchback's reputation.
Now the fact that Henry VII had been dead half a century when Shakespeare was born would have deterred more timid presenters. But not our Kay. Oh no. She ploughed on fearlessly with her intellectual line of questioning, untroubled by such trifling matters as historical chronology. What a gal!
Sheep effect most likely - with more than a few posters hoping to get down with 'popular opinion'.
I don't understand the villification dished out to this woman. To my simple mind she seems a perfectly able, competent and likeable journo. I must be missing something...envy perhaps ?