Options

Has anyone had a go at you on DS?

191012141522

Comments

  • Options
    jrajra Posts: 48,325
    Forum Member
    Jane Doh! wrote: »
    To be fair, that's your problem, not anybody else's.

    I try to avoid making errors in the first place. It happens, of course it does. But it's sensible to proof read your post before submitting it, to prevent the above scenario that irritates you so much.

    And you don't think I do that. Sometimes, I need to modify posts, due to typos and clarification of information, which can take some time.

    You do realise I'm pretty certain I'm partly dyslexic, although not diagnosed as of yet, as I make frequent typos, miss words out and type double words all the time.
    Jane Doh! wrote:
    To be even fairer, the post you are talking about wasn't relevant to the thread in question, so I agree with Pull2Open who said you weren't comparing like with like. You weren't.

    Well, on this occasion, we'll have to agree to disagree.
    Jane Doh! wrote:
    Remember the conversation we had at the time? Those points still stand.

    Talking about conversations, have you got any response to the last two PMs I sent you, which AFAIK were never replied to. Currently, I've got 299 PMs in my DS box. The limit is 300. :p
  • Options
    stoatiestoatie Posts: 78,106
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    jra wrote: »
    And you don't think I do that. Sometimes, I need to modify posts, due to typos and clarification of information, which can take some time.

    You do realise I'm pretty certain I'm partly dyslexic, although not diagnosed as of yet, as I make frequent typos, miss words out and type double words all the time.

    Sure, fair enough, but how is that any easier to check after you've posted it than it was before? It's the same text. In the same font.

    EDIT- on the same background.
  • Options
    Pull2OpenPull2Open Posts: 15,138
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    stoatie wrote: »
    Sure, fair enough, but how is that any easier to check after you've posted it than it was before? It's the same text. In the same font.

    EDIT- on the same background.

    You stole my thunder :D
  • Options
    annette kurtenannette kurten Posts: 39,543
    Forum Member
    stoatie wrote: »
    Sure, fair enough, but how is that any easier to check after you've posted it than it was before? It's the same text. In the same font.

    EDIT- on the same background.

    or avail oneself of the preview facility.
  • Options
    Jane Doh!Jane Doh! Posts: 43,307
    Forum Member
    jra wrote: »
    And you don't think I do that. Sometimes, I need to modify posts, due to typos and clarification of information, which can take some time.

    You do realise I'm pretty certain I'm partly dyslexic, although not diagnosed as of yet, as I make frequent typos, miss words out and type double words all the time.

    Well, on this occasion, we'll have to agree to disagree.

    Talking about conversations, have you got any response to the last two PMs I sent you, which AFAIK were never replied to. Currently, I've got 299 PMs in my DS box. The limit is 300. :p
    If you think you are dyslexic, that's even more reason to proof read and use a good spell checker. My daughter has to do this all the time.

    Haven't checked PMs, to be honest. I'll do it now!
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 6,924
    Forum Member
    stoatie wrote: »
    Your mum owns a dishwasher.

    Starting to really like these dishwasher insults. :)
  • Options
    Hobbit FeetHobbit Feet Posts: 18,798
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    avasgranny wrote: »
    Starting to really like these dishwasher insults. :)

    bah

    your grandaughter doesn't know how to use a dishwasher

    :D
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 6,924
    Forum Member
    bah

    your grandaughter doesn't know how to use a dishwasher

    :D

    :D:D Sadly you are right. That is what floors are for apparently.
  • Options
    jrajra Posts: 48,325
    Forum Member
    stoatie wrote: »
    Sure, fair enough, but how is that any easier to check after you've posted it than it was before? It's the same text. In the same font.

    Because, at the time, even though I have re-read the post more than once, I didn't see the errors. So, if I check later, before the editing time limit (30 minutes), I might spot them then.
  • Options
    jrajra Posts: 48,325
    Forum Member
    Pull2Open wrote: »
    If you want to avoid conflict and confusion then so be it! Otherwise, you're going to get annoyed frequently!

    Or you could simply make sure that your post is complete before hitting the submit button!

    Yeah.

    I see from my PM inbox, we've had a bit of a history regarding one thread in particular.

    I'd forgotten about it to be honest, but there you go.
  • Options
    Miss XYZMiss XYZ Posts: 14,023
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jra wrote: »
    That's another thing I find annoying. People who reply too quickly after you've posted, before you've had time to edit/fix errors and make available additional information. 2 minutes in your case. I can't tell you what to do on a forum, obviously, but don't be surprised if what you've quoted is different from my final edit. Luckily, in this case, it wasn't applicable.

    No doubt, I've done the same, but I do try to avoid, the 'instantly post after someone else has' syndrome.

    There's another FM who can probably relate to this problem.
  • Options
    stoatiestoatie Posts: 78,106
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    jra wrote: »
    Because, at the time, even though I have re-read the post more than once, I didn't see the errors. So, if I check later, before the editing time limit (30 minutes), I might spot them then.

    You want people to wait 30 MINUTES???
  • Options
    Pull2OpenPull2Open Posts: 15,138
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    stoatie wrote: »
    You want people to wait 30 MINUTES???

    It'll certainly slow things down around here!
  • Options
    clarriboclarribo Posts: 6,258
    Forum Member
    I once dared to say I don't fancy working as a cleaner... that went well.
  • Options
    stoatiestoatie Posts: 78,106
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Pull2Open wrote: »
    It'll certainly slow things down around here!

    Nobody tell the CTAM people. It'll break their weird little hearts.
  • Options
    Miss XYZMiss XYZ Posts: 14,023
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    stoatie wrote: »
    You want people to wait 30 MINUTES???

    You replied after a mere 9 minutes stoatie, shame on you!
  • Options
    jrajra Posts: 48,325
    Forum Member
    stoatie wrote: »
    You want people to wait 30 MINUTES???

    Of course not, but it might take me more than 30 minutes to spot the errors.
  • Options
    agrainofsandagrainofsand Posts: 8,693
    Forum Member
    Miss XYZ wrote: »
    There's another FM who can probably relate to this problem.

    I'll bet you mean me XYZ...:mad:

    You and your Mum own a dishwasher.
  • Options
    stoatiestoatie Posts: 78,106
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    jra wrote: »
    Of course not, but it might take me more than 30 minutes to spot the errors.

    Which kind of makes the whole thing somewhat moot, surely?

    Why is any of this the fault of the person replying?

    What are we even arguing about here?
  • Options
    vosnevosne Posts: 14,131
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jra wrote: »
    Of course not, but it might take me more than 30 minutes to spot the errors.

    You could just write total shit with errors a plenty and thinly disguised profanities galore. And not give a toss about the inevitable fall out. Works for me...hoozah.
  • Options
    Miss XYZMiss XYZ Posts: 14,023
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I'll bet you mean me XYZ...:mad:

    You and your Mum own a dishwasher.


    Yep, of course I did!! :D

    My Mum does but I don't. I HATE dishwashers!
  • Options
    jrajra Posts: 48,325
    Forum Member
    stoatie wrote: »
    Nobody tell the CTAM people. It'll break their weird little hearts.

    I think I posted in that thread. :o

    IIRC, at the time, somebody couldn't add up.

    Might have been me.

    :eek:
  • Options
    Miss XYZMiss XYZ Posts: 14,023
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jra wrote: »
    I think I posted in that thread. :o

    IIRC, at the time, somebody couldn't add up.

    Might have been me.

    :eek:

    I bet that caused chaos in the thread. :eek:
  • Options
    vosnevosne Posts: 14,131
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I use my cat as a dishwasher. Just throw the whole lot in the bath with the reluctant beast and hold it under till the jobs done. Remarkably efficient.
  • Options
    macsmurraymacsmurray Posts: 2,134
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    vosne wrote: »
    I use my cat as a dishwasher. Just throw the whole lot in the bath with the reluctant beast and hold it under till the jobs done. Remarkably efficient.

    What about baked on grime, won't the cat die before its clean?

    Or do you have a supply of dishcats?
This discussion has been closed.