Katie Price has had her Baby

14243454748174

Comments

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 503
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    bunny55 wrote: »
    I dont think she will be lonely at all. She has a wide circle of friends, some she has had since she was a teenager, and a close family. She has wealth and an extremely comfortable life. . Her children adore her, if we can judge any celeb from their reality shows and photos. .

    She will grow old disgracefully and live her life to the full and thats what many people like about her. She gained a lot of supporters after CAN did themselves no favours.

    I don't think she is happy, she is so desperate for attention that she literally can't be without a man... the wealth and comfortable life don't seem to be making her happy, and she has spent most of her marriage starting feud's and talking about the dimensions of ex partners dangly bits.

    I think that she has lost a lot of her fans since the split with PA and CAN... not gained them. Her brand is really quite toxic and I doubt she is making the money she once did!

    As you say she will grow old disgracefully, humiliating her children, marrying and divorcing and altering her appearance until she actually has morphed into a Jackie Stallone type creature... her legacy will be the kiss and tells and unsavoury exploits archived in her books and on google for her children and their children to shudder at!

    but hey ho... she has her wealth!
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2,114
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    lion5 wrote: »
    I don't think she is happy, she is so desperate for attention that she literally can't be without a man... the wealth and comfortable life don't seem to be making her happy, and she has spent most of her marriage starting feud's and talking about the dimensions of ex partners dangly bits.

    I think that she has lost a lot of her fans since the split with PA and CAN... not gained them. Her brand is really quite toxic and I doubt she is making the money she once did!

    As you say she will grow old disgracefully, humiliating her children, marrying and divorcing and altering her appearance until she actually has morphed into a Jackie Stallone type creature... her legacy will be the kiss and tells and unsavoury exploits archived in her books and on google for her children and their children to shudder at!

    but hey ho... she has her wealth!

    She hasnt changed and its not like Mary Poppins became a porn star. She was a glamour model who became an entrepreneur.

    For her children, her legacy will be as their mum and one who withdrew them from public life and tried to give them as normal a childhood as possible. I have no doubt they will have unconditional love for their mother, but none of us know how these children will develop in the next ten years or the relationships they will have with their parents when they are adults. Im sure Kate will have many discussions with them, when they are older.

    She has remarried and the children now have a new baby brother. For them, its positive.

    Shes fallible, but I dont mind that.
  • fifitrixibellefifitrixibelle Posts: 3,834
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I also have some idea of what she is like in "real life" - i would say whilst not all sweetness and light there are definitely differences - a much more vulnerable side at times - and for anyone trying to make out she doesn't put the kids first that's crazy. She's a very protective mother. "Jordan" was an extrovert character, KP is not, for the most part, and she's certainly not morphed into her.

    But for all the it's all her fault, she brought it on herself, she blames everyone else blah blah blah ... there are very few celebs who I have known who i could say fame hasn't messed them up in some way and isn't directly to blame for either what happened to them or how they changed.

    I would say that anyone who thinks she put's her kids first is utterly crazy.
    She is not protective, you don't get bladdered whilst pregnant, you don't get in a horsebox and travel the continent when you have been twittering on about 'complications' and uncannily 'knowing' it would likely 'pop' out any time soon, yada,yada
    You don't prattle on to the shittiest rag around BEFORE you have told your children. and you don't head f**k these kids with stranger after stranger and wedding after wedding, or sod off for weeks on end on jollies in Argentina.
    Not ONE of these and a huge and never ending catalogue of selfishness has ever been in the interests or 'protection' of her children - as she proudly boasts 'it's all about me' - already selling the latest one for her much loved and grubby money.
    She is repulsive and repugnant. And frankly if this is anyone's idea of being 'protective' I am utterly stunned and have a massively different interpretation and standard of the phrase.
    In my world you put your children, their emotional and physical safety and stability first, last and always - she does none of this.
  • SenseiSamSenseiSam Posts: 3,069
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    I doubt it. She has trampled on endless lists of people on her way up, and on this slide downward and people don't forget.
    Family ? Natch.
    Friends ? Hangers on and clingons.
    Where is Gary BFF! these days ? Finally saw through her and is now on the periphery of her clique .;)

    I think there may be other reasons for keeping her friendship with Gary and Phill more low profile. Firstly they might be playing a part in the CC, something both sides are being ultra-cautious about. Secondly they introduced Katie to Kev and if you look back at his Oct/Nov tweets he seemed very much part of their circle regularly RTing and tweeting to them. While she positively revelled in Alex's sexuality when first married to him she seems to want to present Kev as a heterosexual hunk, which he may well be but judging by his twitter account he also had an enthusiastic gay following which might be what they're trying to play down. Just a thought.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 503
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    bunny55 wrote: »
    She hasnt changed and its not like Mary Poppins became a porn star. She was a glamour model who became an entrepreneur.

    For her children, her legacy will be as their mum and one who withdrew them from public life and tried to give them as normal a childhood as possible. I have no doubt they will have unconditional love for their mother, but none of us know how these children will develop in the next ten years or the relationships they will have with their parents when they are adults. Im sure Kate will have many discussions with them, when they are older.

    She has remarried and the children now have a new baby brother. For them, its positive.

    Shes fallible, but I dont mind that.

    she is a washed up glamour model that with the support and guidance of CAN and her brother became an entrepreneur, but now she earns a living by sticking diamante onto plastic sandals and dressing up in ridiculous and tacky costumes in a desperate attempt to maintain a profile to sell her tat!

    I don't think that having a new Dad almost every year, and having a Mum who humiliates her self by flogging the sordid details of her exploits is a normal childhood!

    As for withdrawing them from the public eye, she still had Harvey in her show- when she could hold onto one, she still tweets about them and posts pictures of them and takes them to places like promotional events where they will be papped.

    I am sure they will be excited to meet their little brother, but I wouldn't bet that she is above selling pictures as soon as its suits her... just like his bump photos.

    You are right... it will be interesting to see how they will turn out.. I am hoping that they have far more common sense than their mum, and are secure enough not to crave attention and go to any lengths to achieve it!

    For their sake I hope they never google their Mums name, or read any of Rebecca's books and that none of their friends, classmates, colleagues or peers do!
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 9,933
    Forum Member
    bunny55 wrote: »
    She hasnt changed and its not like Mary Poppins became a porn star. She was a glamour model who became an entrepreneur.

    For her children, her legacy will be as their mum and one who withdrew them from public life and tried to give them as normal a childhood as possible. I have no doubt they will have unconditional love for their mother, but none of us know how these children will develop in the next ten years or the relationships they will have with their parents when they are adults. Im sure Kate will have many discussions with them, when they are older.

    She has remarried and the children now have a new baby brother. For them, its positive.

    Shes fallible, but I dont mind that.

    Although this latest husband is their third stepfather in 4 years, surely that can't be seen by anyone as being positive for the children. Don't you think they wonder why they seem to disappear and all contact is broken off after less than a year
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 503
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I would say that anyone who thinks she put's her kids first is utterly crazy.
    She is not protective, you don't get bladdered whilst pregnant, you don't get in a horsebox and travel the continent when you have been twittering on about 'complications' and uncannily 'knowing' it would likely 'pop' out any time soon, yada,yada
    You don't prattle on to the shittiest rag around BEFORE you have told your children. and you don't head f**k these kids with stranger after stranger and wedding after wedding, or sod off for weeks on end on jollies in Argentina.
    Not ONE of these and a huge and never ending catalogue of selfishness has ever been in the interests or 'protection' of her children - as she proudly boasts 'it's all about me' - already selling the latest one for her much loved and grubby money.
    She is repulsive and repugnant. And frankly if this is anyone's idea of being 'protective' I am utterly stunned and have a massively different interpretation and standard of the phrase.
    In my world you put your children, their emotional and physical safety and stability first, last and always - she does none of this.

    Well ... another excellent post! Took the words out of my mouth!
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    I would say that anyone who thinks she put's her kids first is utterly crazy.
    She is not protective, you don't get bladdered whilst pregnant, you don't get in a horsebox and travel the continent when you have been twittering on about 'complications' and uncannily 'knowing' it would likely 'pop' out any time soon, yada,yada
    You don't prattle on to the shittiest rag around BEFORE you have told your children. and you don't head f**k these kids with stranger after stranger and wedding after wedding, or sod off for weeks on end on jollies in Argentina.
    Not ONE of these and a huge and never ending catalogue of selfishness has ever been in the interests or 'protection' of her children - as she proudly boasts 'it's all about me' - already selling the latest one for her much loved and grubby money.
    She is repulsive and repugnant. And frankly if this is anyone's idea of being 'protective' I am utterly stunned and have a massively different interpretation and standard of the phrase.
    In my world you put your children, their emotional and physical safety and stability first, last and always - she does none of this.
    lion5 wrote: »
    she is a washed up glamour model that with the support and guidance of CAN and her brother became an entrepreneur, but now she earns a living by sticking diamante onto plastic sandals and dressing up in ridiculous and tacky costumes in a desperate attempt to maintain a profile to sell her tat!

    I don't think that having a new Dad almost every year, and having a Mum who humiliates her self by flogging the sordid details of her exploits is a normal childhood!

    As for withdrawing them from the public eye, she still had Harvey in her show- when she could hold onto one, she still tweets about them and posts pictures of them and takes them to places like promotional events where they will be papped.

    I am sure they will be excited to meet their little brother, but I wouldn't bet that she is above selling pictures as soon as its suits her... just like his bump photos.

    You are right... it will be interesting to see how they will turn out.. I am hoping that they have far more common sense than their mum, and are secure enough not to crave attention and go to any lengths to achieve it!

    For their sake I hope they never google their Mums name, or read any of Rebecca's books and that none of their friends, classmates, colleagues or peers do!

    Perfect posts.
    Said it much better than I ever could (though I DO try:D)
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,301
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I would say that anyone who thinks she put's her kids first is utterly crazy.
    She is not protective, you don't get bladdered whilst pregnant, you don't get in a horsebox and travel the continent when you have been twittering on about 'complications' and uncannily 'knowing' it would likely 'pop' out any time soon, yada,yada
    You don't prattle on to the shittiest rag around BEFORE you have told your children. and you don't head f**k these kids with stranger after stranger and wedding after wedding, or sod off for weeks on end on jollies in Argentina.
    Not ONE of these and a huge and never ending catalogue of selfishness has ever been in the interests or 'protection' of her children - as she proudly boasts 'it's all about me' - already selling the latest one for her much loved and grubby money.
    She is repulsive and repugnant. And frankly if this is anyone's idea of being 'protective' I am utterly stunned and have a massively different interpretation and standard of the phrase.
    In my world you put your children, their emotional and physical safety and stability first, last and always - she does none of this.

    Well said that describes her perfectly.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 1,301
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    lion5 wrote: »
    she is a washed up glamour model that with the support and guidance of CAN and her brother became an entrepreneur, but now she earns a living by sticking diamante onto plastic sandals and dressing up in ridiculous and tacky costumes in a desperate attempt to maintain a profile to sell her tat!

    I don't think that having a new Dad almost every year, and having a Mum who humiliates her self by flogging the sordid details of her exploits is a normal childhood!

    As for withdrawing them from the public eye, she still had Harvey in her show- when she could hold onto one, she still tweets about them and posts pictures of them and takes them to places like promotional events where they will be papped.

    I am sure they will be excited to meet their little brother, but I wouldn't bet that she is above selling pictures as soon as its suits her... just like his bump photos.

    You are right... it will be interesting to see how they will turn out.. I am hoping that they have far more common sense than their mum, and are secure enough not to crave attention and go to any lengths to achieve it!

    For their sake I hope they never google their Mums name, or read any of Rebecca's books and that none of their friends, classmates, colleagues or peers do!

    Well said spot on.
  • sunnypicklessunnypickles Posts: 202
    Forum Member
    I have been reading this thread with the thought of how much dwama can go into a pwivate pregnancy, I read the sun article on her pregnancy/birth from hell, i thought it was an extract from a book she was working on:o! The OTT screaming at the doctors who did not speak English, the supposed needle fear when she has been under the knife and botoxed to an inch of her life and the dates not adding up, with all these scary predictions of an eventful pregnancy that have all come true! I am sure this woman employes a script writer from Eastenders to come up with stuff bigger and scarier than before to stay in the public eye!

    When is this woman going to realise she is on the wane, we don't care about fakery, and fade in to the background to live a happy life with husband number (insert number) and kids!
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 503
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I have been reading this thread with the thought of how much dwama can go into a pwivate pregnancy, I read the sun article on her pregnancy/birth from hell, i thought it was an extract from a book she was working on:o! The OTT screaming at the doctors who did not speak English, the supposed needle fear when she has been under the knife and botoxed to an inch of her life and the dates not adding up, with all these scary predictions of an eventful pregnancy that have all come true! I am sure this woman employes a script writer from Eastenders to come up with stuff bigger and scarier than before to stay in the public eye!

    When is this woman going to realise she is on the wane, we don't care about fakery, and fade in to the background to live a happy life with husband number (insert number) and kids!

    I must be in a very agreeable mood this evening... because I couldn't agree more with your post too!

    Its like my thoughts are just appearing on screen...
  • jannajanna Posts: 7,323
    Forum Member
    lion5 wrote: »
    I must be in a very agreeable mood this evening... because I couldn't agree more with your post too!

    Its like my thoughts are just appearing on screen...

    We are practising our psychicness so we can descend on Pwicey Palace disguised as Sally Morgan,Derek Acorah, Mystic Meg and Russel Grant. She won't suspect a fing.
  • sunnypicklessunnypickles Posts: 202
    Forum Member
    lion5 wrote: »
    I must be in a very agreeable mood this evening... because I couldn't agree more with your post too!

    Its like my thoughts are just appearing on screen...

    Thank you. I have been in agreement with yours and Janna's posts. This poor child is not even 3 weeks old yet and already it is the centre of a moneymaking scheme. I am very scathing of people who exploit their own kids for monetary gain. I am surprised at how many people defend this claptrap and how much she gets away with, while selling pulp fiction to diminishing fan base who lets face it, in this climate, have better things to worry about like jobs, money and how to feed their own children, rather than buying the cheap tat she is selling. :eek:
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 503
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    janna wrote: »
    We are practising our psychicness so we can descend on Pwicey Palace disguised as Sally Morgan,Derek Acorah, Mystic Meg and Russel Grant. She won't suspect a fing.

    Perhaps I could dress up as Darren Brown? He seems to be able to make people sleep and be silent at will!

    I could say 'look into my eyes, not around the eyes, look into my eyes.. 3.2.1. you're under.... now bark like a dog....oh and you can no longer lie :D:D:D:D

    if we are rumbled, it may be a useful diversion! :cool:
  • fredsterfredster Posts: 31,802
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I would say that anyone who thinks she put's her kids first is utterly crazy.
    She is not protective, you don't get bladdered whilst pregnant, you don't get in a horsebox and travel the continent when you have been twittering on about 'complications' and uncannily 'knowing' it would likely 'pop' out any time soon, yada,yada
    You don't prattle on to the shittiest rag around BEFORE you have told your children. and you don't head f**k these kids with stranger after stranger and wedding after wedding, or sod off for weeks on end on jollies in Argentina.
    Not ONE of these and a huge and never ending catalogue of selfishness has ever been in the interests or 'protection' of her children - as she proudly boasts 'it's all about me' - already selling the latest one for her much loved and grubby money.
    She is repulsive and repugnant. And frankly if this is anyone's idea of being 'protective' I am utterly stunned and have a massively different interpretation and standard of the phrase.
    In my world you put your children, their emotional and physical safety and stability first, last and always - she does none of this.

    Excellent post, you are saying everything I would like to say, but better than I would.:)
  • MuttsnuttsMuttsnutts Posts: 3,506
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    bunny55 wrote: »
    She hasnt changed and its not like Mary Poppins became a porn star. She was a glamour model who became an entrepreneur.

    For her children, her legacy will be as their mum and one who withdrew them from public life and tried to give them as normal a childhood as possible. I have no doubt they will have unconditional love for their mother, but none of us know how these children will develop in the next ten years or the relationships they will have with their parents when they are adults. Im sure Kate will have many discussions with them, when they are older.

    She has remarried and the children now have a new baby brother. For them, its positive.

    Shes fallible, but I dont mind that.

    I rather think publicised comments about Daddy Alex & Mummy's Vodka pursuits, Chipolata's, Hairy Toe Vid & comments about every part-time boyfriend being a better Dad than their Dad will be the legacy that has the biggest effect on them, unfortunately. That is not putting their wellbeing first.
    :rolleyes:
  • benjaminibenjamini Posts: 32,066
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    lion5 wrote: »
    she is a washed up glamour model that with the support and guidance of CAN and her brother became an entrepreneur, but now she earns a living by sticking diamante onto plastic sandals and dressing up in ridiculous and tacky costumes in a desperate attempt to maintain a profile to sell her tat!

    I don't think that having a new Dad almost every year, and having a Mum who humiliates her self by flogging the sordid details of her exploits is a normal childhood!

    As for withdrawing them from the public eye, she still had Harvey in her show- when she could hold onto one, she still tweets about them and posts pictures of them and takes them to places like promotional events where they will be papped.

    I am sure they will be excited to meet their little brother, but I wouldn't bet that she is above selling pictures as soon as its suits her... just like his bump photos.

    You are right... it will be interesting to see how they will turn out.. I am hoping that they have far more common sense than their mum, and are secure enough not to crave attention and go to any lengths to achieve it!

    For their sake I hope they never google their Mums name, or read any of Rebecca's books and that none of their friends, classmates, colleagues or peers do!

    And this thread will almost certainly be what turns up. Take a bow and be proud, you promote her and her every insignificant tedious waking hour far better than she ever could.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 503
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    benjamini wrote: »
    And this thread will almost certainly be what turns up. Take a bow and be proud, you promote her and her every insignificant tedious waking hour far better than she ever could.

    :rolleyes:

    I doubt it.... google KP and see what pops up.... as long as your over 18, not easily offended and have a stomach of cast iron :D:D:D
  • MuttsnuttsMuttsnutts Posts: 3,506
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    lion5 wrote: »
    :rolleyes:

    I doubt it.... google KP and see what pops up.... as long as your over 18, not easily offended and have a stomach of cast iron :D:D:D

    Ha, good reply.:D
  • LoriseLorise Posts: 932
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    KP has tweeted

    Miss home so much & miss our family and friends it's been 5 weeks now! Jett still in baby unit with breathing problems.


    as a parent myself, I hope the little un is ok, but I just do not believe anything that comes from her mouth/tweets etc, wouldn't put it past her to read this thread (as we know her fans tweet what is said about her) then she tweets stuff to make us all of a sudden feel for her...or more than likely to carry on this Drama story.
  • benjaminibenjamini Posts: 32,066
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Lorise wrote: »
    KP has tweeted

    Miss home so much & miss our family and friends it's been 5 weeks now! Jett still in baby unit with breathing problems.


    as a parent myself, I hope the little un is ok, but I just do not believe anything that comes from her mouth/tweets etc, wouldn't put it past her to read this thread (as we know her fans tweet what is said about her) then she tweets stuff to make us all of a sudden feel for her...or more than likely to carry on this Drama story.

    I have no idea of the truth, nor have you. Undoubtedly there is a baby involved tho and the really creepy idea that so many of you are actually stalking her in this way is quite disturbing.
  • johartukjohartuk Posts: 11,320
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    bunny55 wrote: »

    For her children, her legacy will be as their mum and one who withdrew them from public life and tried to give them as normal a childhood as possible.

    What a sad, pathetic legacy! It's not even as if she did that out of genuine love and concern for her kids - it was all done to point score against her ex! :rolleyes:

    KP could leave a positive legacy by sponsoring a young equestrian, investing in an exisiting business or one that someone is trying to set up, investing some of her money in a school for children with special needs or investing in a 'riding for the disabled' venture.

    There are so many positive things she could do with her time and money, which her kids would be proud of. Instead they have her endless string of crappy autobios, photos and video footage of her publicity stunts (who can forget the giant vagina costume?), the Dane Bowers sex vid, her attempt to be selected for Eurovision while dressed as a giant condom...and the mountain of press clippings, which expose her sordid behavior for all to see (and read about). A great legacy...not!:rolleyes:
  • LoriseLorise Posts: 932
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    benjamini wrote: »
    I have no idea of the truth, nor have you. Undoubtedly there is a baby involved tho and the really creepy idea that so many of you are actually stalking her in this way is quite disturbing.

    Shit really am I stalking her?.....god you better report me to the police for reading it in the daily mail as they reported the story...get all those reporters done for stalking too while you are at it.....fancy a paper reading someones public twitter account and reporting story on it
  • FlannoFlanno Posts: 1,427
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Lorise wrote: »
    KP has tweeted

    Miss home so much & miss our family and friends it's been 5 weeks now! Jett still in baby unit with breathing problems.


    as a parent myself, I hope the little un is ok, but I just do not believe anything that comes from her mouth/tweets etc, wouldn't put it past her to read this thread (as we know her fans tweet what is said about her) then she tweets stuff to make us all of a sudden feel for her...or more than likely to carry on this Drama story.

    I wonder if her mum, Amy, is with Katie 'n' Kev at this moment of crisis?

    Judging from Katie's 'n' Kev's tweets, there's no mention of Amy at all. Surely she would have helped them by minding her grandson, Harvey while they visit Jett in hospital.

    A mother's natural reaction is to drop everything and go over to help her daughter out when in case of distress/trouble, wouldn't she?
This discussion has been closed.