The Ultimate Smartphone (according to DS readers)

-GONZO--GONZO- Posts: 9,624
Forum Member
Some interesting results from the Ultimate Smartphone poll by DS readers. Just gotta love the mock-up they've done :)
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tech/news/a523362/build-your-ultimate-smartphone-results-readers-dream-phones-revealed.html
«134567

Comments

  • Zee_BukhariZee_Bukhari Posts: 1,335
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    A load of sheep, I feel sorry for many of those readers.
  • Zack06Zack06 Posts: 28,304
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    What a fail. And why is it running Android with the Touchwiz UI? :confused:
  • jabbamk1jabbamk1 Posts: 8,942
    Forum Member
  • SkipTracerSkipTracer Posts: 2,959
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    jabbamk1 wrote: »

    I brought one of those back when and it cost me about the same as my Huawei G300 did last year.

    I think we must be getting more for our money now.:)
  • jabbamk1jabbamk1 Posts: 8,942
    Forum Member
    SkipTracer wrote: »
    I brought one of those back when and it cost me about the same as my Huawei G300 did last year.

    I think we must be getting more for our money now.:)

    You bought a 4G enabled Nokia 3310????
  • finbaarfinbaar Posts: 4,818
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    So when Samsung build this phone will they got off any law suits from Apple and Nokia by sying the DS readers made them do it?
  • SkipTracerSkipTracer Posts: 2,959
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    jabbamk1 wrote: »
    You bought a 4G enabled Nokia 3310????

    Didn’t notice the LTE bit and did not note it was a mock up joke I just took it as a bog standard 3310 but had the 3310 was able to download data I bet the download would have been at least a Gb/s.:D
  • swordmanswordman Posts: 6,679
    Forum Member
    It does make you wonder what people look for when they buy a phone as they are clearly clueless.
  • alan1302alan1302 Posts: 6,336
    Forum Member
    swordman wrote: »
    It does make you wonder what people look for when they buy a phone as they are clearly clueless.

    Yawn :yawn:
  • psionicpsionic Posts: 20,188
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Comes as a surprise to me that anyone ventures anywhere but the forums on DS. :)
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 995
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    The android makes it look awful
  • cnbcwatchercnbcwatcher Posts: 56,681
    Forum Member
    jabbamk1 wrote: »

    My dad had one of those phones back in the day :D I didn't have one though.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 17,123
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jabbamk1 wrote: »

    I had a 3310. Best of its time. Had it for ages.
  • swordmanswordman Posts: 6,679
    Forum Member
    alan1302 wrote: »
    Yawn :yawn:

    You don't actually need the "yawn" or did your originality fail you in making the required characters - :rolleyes: rolls eyes
  • calico_piecalico_pie Posts: 10,060
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    A load of sheep, I feel sorry for many of those readers.

    How do you mean?
  • calico_piecalico_pie Posts: 10,060
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    swordman wrote: »
    It does make you wonder what people look for when they buy a phone as they are clearly clueless.

    Clueless? Could you expand on that please?

    Which people, and in what ways are they clueless?
  • jabbamk1jabbamk1 Posts: 8,942
    Forum Member
    calico_pie wrote: »
    Clueless? Could you expand on that please?

    Which people, and in what ways are they clueless?

    Well people seem to think that a 1440mAh battery Is better than one double the size.....

    But then an apple product is always better right :p
  • calico_piecalico_pie Posts: 10,060
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jabbamk1 wrote: »
    Well people seem to think that a 1440mAh battery Is better than one double the size.....

    But then an apple product is always better right :p

    Where does it say that?
  • jabbamk1jabbamk1 Posts: 8,942
    Forum Member
    calico_pie wrote: »
    Where does it say that?

    In the poll....
  • flyingvflyingv Posts: 4,300
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    More Apple vs Android willy-waving... :D:D
  • calico_piecalico_pie Posts: 10,060
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    jabbamk1 wrote: »
    In the poll....

    No it doesn't.

    There's a question which lumps the battery preference in with the processor question.

    Some people opted for the processor / battery combination.

    You can't infer from that they think the battery on its own is better than another battery.
  • StigglesStiggles Posts: 9,618
    Forum Member
    calico_pie wrote: »
    No it doesn't.

    There's a question which lumps the battery preference in with the processor question.

    Some people opted for the processor / battery combination.

    You can't infer from that they think the battery on its own is better than another battery.

    Yes and some people picked the worst one.

    Personally i would have gone with the 3000 mAh from the LG G2 and a 2.26 GHz Snapdragon 800.
  • alan1302alan1302 Posts: 6,336
    Forum Member
    swordman wrote: »
    You don't actually need the "yawn" or did your originality fail you in making the required characters - :rolleyes: rolls eyes

    I typed 'yawn' then remembered there was a 'yawn' smilie so clicked that and then could not be bothered to delete the word 'yawn' :D
  • calico_piecalico_pie Posts: 10,060
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Stiggles wrote: »
    Yes and some people picked the worst one.

    Personally i would have gone with the 3000 mAh from the LG G2 and a 2.26 GHz Snapdragon 800.

    No, not yes. Because the original point was about how people were clueless because they apparently opted for a worse battery.

    The poll doesn't actually say that.

    And I don't know that not opting for the above means that people are clueless.
  • swordmanswordman Posts: 6,679
    Forum Member
    alan1302 wrote: »
    I typed 'yawn' then remembered there was a 'yawn' smilie so clicked that and then could not be bothered to delete the word 'yawn' :D

    Made you explain :p
Sign In or Register to comment.