Options
An Issue Has Been Resolved (Post TATM)
Shawn_Lunn
Posts: 9,353
Forum Member
✭
I don't know where this came from but look ...
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mb9qyuOyJ61qf8sfoo1_500.png
Hope it's true.
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mb9qyuOyJ61qf8sfoo1_500.png
Hope it's true.
0
Comments
If whoever wrote that isn't on the Dr Who writing staff, they should be.
Her and Rory raising Melody
Amy writing children's books, including one called 'The Legend Of Pandora's Box'
Rory dying in 2000
Amy dying around 2005
Amy being one of the few journalists to interview Nixon
Amy/Rory being power players of sorts
Fighting against corruption
The interview done by Sarah Jane Smith - March 26th 2005
I've seen it a few times from different people posting on various platforms. I understand whippersnappers call it "going viral".
It's really good.
It shows how Rory is indeed the master and his plan all along was to get hold of The Rani's fobwatch and convert her back again. He has done that now. The fobwatch was somewhere/when in New York. Amy was the Rani. He also needed a hospital pass with the wrong date and a duck pond to pull it off. It's great.
In a nutshell: It shows a newspaper article about Amelia (Jessica) Williams, her life and what she and her husband accomplished. It says the article was written by Sarah Jane Smith.
Whoever created it done a very good job
Marvellous!
Tease
Definitely but it is rather good though.:D
Except the bringing up of Melody. Had they done that, it would entirely negate the psychopathy of her character, and therefore quite a large part of the Doctor's story.
Not sure myself as IIRC there was no actual mention of how old he was in that ep, so it could be plausible.
Thanks for posting it!
What would a professional version of it look like then?
There was one line that jarred and the bringing up the young River contradicts established canon. But apart from that... wonderful, I thought.
I'm genuinely curious as to what makes you say it's not professional quality.
I don't want to go into specifics because that will detract from what there is there I think. I would rather just leave it that it's a lovely, really charming, fan piece that I thoroughly enjoyed, but imho it is not professional quality. It's a bit far off it.
Cheers
(That's 'this made me laugh out loud' for the non-whippersnapper generation)
Fair enough. Your opinion is your own. I do get that, you know. I was merely inviting you to substantiate it.