Call Of Duty : World At War
[Deleted User]
Posts: 1,653
Forum Member
✭✭✭
Ah well its starting.
First teaser is here!!
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/35341.html
sadly no apparent gameplay footage but some noticible things.
Such as;
Flame thrower & Sword slash
2 good additions, close quarter like knife fight for the sword, flame thrower would be good.
Now we must await a larger trailer, which I think will be sooner rather than later.
Activision know that COD4 has rasied the bar so high they are gonna need to promote this to high heaven an make sure its online is decent
First teaser is here!!
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/35341.html
sadly no apparent gameplay footage but some noticible things.
Such as;
Flame thrower & Sword slash
2 good additions, close quarter like knife fight for the sword, flame thrower would be good.
Now we must await a larger trailer, which I think will be sooner rather than later.
Activision know that COD4 has rasied the bar so high they are gonna need to promote this to high heaven an make sure its online is decent
0
Comments
http://www.avidgamer.co.uk/index.php/Trailers/Media-Call-of-Duty-World-at-War-Full-Length-Debut-Trailer.html
Yes mate, you know this.
Hopefully the change in time will make it a new and welcome experience!
New? lol
It's the most overplayed time line in the franchise!! We need more modern warfares
Hmm, well new for next gen? Either way i'm definately buying it! lol
Why not just have at least one more COD in the modern time before returning to that time period, come on how much more can they do in the 40's.
I think that it uses the COD4 engine and would be set in same modern times people would rightly just say. "Hey, this is just a map pack. Why should I spend (up to) £50 for extra maps?"
COD6 (or whatever they call it) will probably try to freshen up modern warfare.
To be honest, If they wanted to I think COD4 could last for a good few years yet, just with releasing gradual extra maps. It is so good and everyone thinks, just right, and so far, nothing has beaten it. sure the ones on their gold crosses, other than finishing off their challenges might be starting to drift from it, but that is a long way off for me. I've not even completed lap 1 yet (Rank 52.) I think there are even game mods I havent even played on it yet.
they should do Call of Duty: Paint ball
I've played COD3 and the game had a horrible engine (and the clunky animation in this trailer tells me that the COD3 engine is well and truly back from the dead) and the online was shoddy, this just looks like more of the same no matter how nicely Treyarch try to dress it up!
I'll stick to COD4 until IW finally make the next one. IW seem a bit more in touch with gamers and those who have been playing since the very first COD game on PC and less interested in the $$$.
I agree, I don't care about if it's WWII or not, I'll get it if the game is good.
But what if it turns out to be dire like most people are expecting, and based on that demo, nobody buys it?
yeah know where you are coming from. They better get cracking then and make it good.
cos they cant churn out a new game every year. It takes them 2 years so they need to cycle them or else just release one game every 2 years.
I really feel they are making a mistake, isn't the CoD series meant to be going forward, not backwards?
Development for the game will have started before COD4's release.
It wouldn't make financial sense to cancel production on the basis of Call of Duty 4's success.
I've been underwhelmed with pretty much every hyped first person shooter so I'm not holding out much for this game, although I don't see why people are writing it off already.