Ofcom's 4G Auction Results

wavejockglwwavejockglw Posts: 10,596
Forum Member
✭✭
Just announced:

Everything Everywhere Ltd

2 x 5 MHz of 800 MHz and
2 x 35 MHz of 2.6 GHz
£588,876,000

Hutchison 3G UK Ltd

2 x 5 MHz of 800 MHz
£225,000,000

Niche Spectrum Ventures Ltd (a subsidiary of BT Group plc)

2 x 15 MHz of 2.6 GHz and
1 x 20 MHz of 2.6 GHz (unpaired)
£186,476,000

Telefónica UK Ltd

2 x 10 MHz of 800 MHz (coverage obligation lot)
£550,000,000

Vodafone Ltd

2 x 10 MHz of 800 MHz,
2 x 20 MHz of 2.6 GHz and
1 x 25 MHz of 2.6 GHz (unpaired)
£790,761,000

Total £2,341,113,000

http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2013/02/20/ofcom-announces-winners-of-the-4g-mobile-auction/
«13456710

Comments

  • Jay-CeeJay-Cee Posts: 2,886
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    so EE got the most? what does 800 mhz and 2.6ghz mean for spectrum?
  • legends wear 7legends wear 7 Posts: 2,102
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Vodafone got the best there
  • daclickdaclick Posts: 3,393
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    I don't know what all them stats mean are vodafone and o2s results extra good them having 2x10mhz of 800?

    Vodafone spent the most but it looks to me like they got the most
  • legends wear 7legends wear 7 Posts: 2,102
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Yup both Vodafone and O2 have a massive market position of the superior sub 1ghz frequency what with their current 900mhz holding
  • prkingprking Posts: 9,791
    Forum Member
    I think all the bidders will be reasonably pleased by the outcome. O2 and Vodafone in particular now have a good slice of the premium spectrum. Those that wanted the higher frequencies for more specialised use will be pleased and Three/EE have now got some prime 800Mhz spectrum.
  • interactiv-ukinteractiv-uk Posts: 627
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    With Telefonica getting the coverage obligation lot and the current project to roll out 3G with Vodafone, maybe it won't be long before people stop complaining about their coverage!
  • mooxmoox Posts: 18,880
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Am I reading this right... O2 got the coverage obligation? I am about to keel over in laughter.

    How many months before they're hauled in to explain why they aren't meeting their obligations?

    I hope their core network can cope with the demand, they must be upgrading to stainless steel tins and the best string.
  • prkingprking Posts: 9,791
    Forum Member
    moox wrote: »
    Am I reading this right... O2 got the coverage obligation? I am about to keel over in laughter.

    How many months before they're hauled in to explain why they aren't meeting their obligations?

    I hope their core network can cope with the demand, they must be upgrading to stainless steel tins and the best string.

    You really do need to stop living in 2009. There is an intelligent discussion to be had here about the uses of the different frequencies and what impact this auction will have on consumers. It also reveals a lack of understanding of the 4G roll out process.

    But some cheap shot at a network you don't like is your contribution?
  • mooxmoox Posts: 18,880
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    prking wrote: »
    You really do need to stop living in 2009. There is an intelligent discussion to be had here about the uses of the different frequencies and what impact this auction will have on consumers. It also reveals a lack of understanding of the 4G roll out process.

    But some cheap shot at a network you don't like is your contribution?

    O2 have patently shown that they were unable to roll out the previous generation network in a sensible amount of time, so it is justified to ask if they will do the same this time.

    I appreciate that O2 is your favourite network but people should be allowed to criticise the auction outcome.

    You do not have to be in 2009 to know that O2 still has poor 3G coverage and a unreliable network (two very major outages happened in 2012)
  • prkingprking Posts: 9,791
    Forum Member
    moox wrote: »
    O2 have patently shown that they were unable to roll out the previous generation network in a sensible amount of time, so it is justified to ask if they will do the same this time.

    I appreciate that O2 is your favourite network but people should be allowed to criticise the auction outcome.

    You do not have to be in 2009 to know that O2 still has poor 3G coverage and a unreliable network (two very major outages happened in 2012)

    We have had this discussion several times, so I'm not going to repeat it. People can look at our posting histories if they are interested.

    By all means criticise the outcome of the auction, but do it based on a full understanding of the situation now and not as it was in 2009.
  • denyo1977denyo1977 Posts: 699
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Sorry for my complete noob questions.
    But why does only one network get coverage obligation? And to me it looks like Three didn't get that much (ok, I know they will still get 1,800Mhz from EE).
  • wavejockglwwavejockglw Posts: 10,596
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Both Vodafone and O2 have won the same amount of 800MHz spectrum and have stated that they will both roll-out their 4G together so one would expect both companies to have similar coverage throughout the UK with 800MHz and both will likely work to the timetable set by the coverage obligation that applies to O2 (Telefonica).

    Overall the auction looks like a good result for the networks and consumers.
  • legends wear 7legends wear 7 Posts: 2,102
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    denyo1977 wrote: »
    Sorry for my complete noob questions.
    But why does only one network get coverage obligation? And to me it looks like Three didn't get that much (ok, I know they will still get 1,800Mhz from EE).

    one lot had a coverage obligation but was a cheaper lot to buy.
  • legends wear 7legends wear 7 Posts: 2,102
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Looking forward to George Osbournes reaction, got £1bn hole in his winter budget
  • DevonBlokeDevonBloke Posts: 6,835
    Forum Member
    Pretty pleased O2 got the CO lot. As wave says it should ensure both VOD and O2 rollout decent coverage over the whole country. I will be quite refreshing to be able to recommend a network to a customer based on price/features rather than coverage. I've been saying "avoid Vodafone/O2 if you want a smartphone" for as long as I can remember.
    Good to see Three getting a nice chunk to go with their 1800.

    In the last week Three have turned off 2G fall back where I live. My Brother is livid. We are very rural. With this auction Three have gone from not having any low frequency spectrum to not having any high frequency spectrum. Good move!
  • flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    the government would have made more money if it was divided in to less bundles. the 3G raised a lot because their were 5 licences and for 4 companies it was unthinkable not to have one. but it's just another tax.

    vodafone have bought a butt load. i wonder what they plan on doing with it.
    Looking forward to George Osbournes reaction, got £1bn hole in his winter budget
    increase taxes by £1bn somewhere or other. you understand that it's not really his budget, it's not his money?
  • JwhiterzJwhiterz Posts: 528
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I don't get what voda want to do with all that 2600 I mean the penetration into buildings is not going to be the best. Maybe like home broadband?
  • flagpoleflagpole Posts: 44,641
    Forum Member
    Jwhiterz wrote: »
    I don't get what voda want to do with all that 2600 I mean the penetration into buildings is not going to be the best. Maybe like home broadband?

    i wondered that.

    i'm not sure what it means. it might just be to reduce the load on the sub 1GHz bands by taking the outdoor/strong signal.

    are they also allowed to recycle all their 2G spectrum? so maybe it's not as top loaded as it looks.
  • DevonBlokeDevonBloke Posts: 6,835
    Forum Member
    I don't think 2600 will be as bad as everyone is making out. It's being compared to CDMA on 2100 and the conclusion is it's higher so it'll be worse. I wouldn't be surprised if the fact that LTE isn't a CDMA technology, makes LTE over 2600 the same or better than 3G over 2100.
    If its so bad, why have EE and Vodafone bought so much?
    For Both these networks the 2600 will massively increase capacity in urban areas, taking the load off the lower frequencies.
  • legends wear 7legends wear 7 Posts: 2,102
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Vodafone carry a substantial radio backhaul network and have just purchased cable and wireless, would think 2600 is going to be used on backhaul/core activities.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 7,134
    Forum Member
    Hello:)

    Vodaphone got the license for free, if you consider their unpaid tax bill.

    In fact, if the Government had withheld license until Vodaphone had paid tax owed, George Osborne would be several billion ahead.
  • beecartbeecart Posts: 544
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    I don't understand.

    Why has O2 only got 800mhz ? Is this detrimental ? Or will vodafone share with O2 ?
  • legends wear 7legends wear 7 Posts: 2,102
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Hello:)

    Vodaphone got the license for free, if you consider their unpaid tax bill.

    In fact, if the Government had withheld license until Vodaphone had paid tax owed, George Osborne would be several billion ahead.

    completely off topic but had to answer as you are spouting untruths.

    Vodafone paid and continue to pay every penny of their tax bill.
  • Everything GoesEverything Goes Posts: 12,972
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    moox wrote: »
    Am I reading this right... O2 got the coverage obligation? I am about to keel over in laughter.

    How many months before they're hauled in to explain why they aren't meeting their obligations?

    I hope their core network can cope with the demand, they must be upgrading to stainless steel tins and the best string.

    Yes couldnt believe it either they must have bidded for it by mistake PMSL :D

    Ofcom will no doubt have to warn them for not meeting coverage obligations like they did with 3G.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 7,134
    Forum Member
    completely off topic but had to answer as you are spouting untruths.

    Vodafone paid and continue to pay every penny of their tax bill.

    Hello:)

    Apart from the several billion tax bill that was written off.

    But technically, you're right.

    But using Cameron's 'morality test', the several billion still stands.
Sign In or Register to comment.