I think that's a bit of an exaggeration! His beard is rather ageing, but he doesn't look 50!
And Jared Leto is a poor comparison because he looks especially young for his age. He's barely changed since My So Called Life. Looking at his mum at the Oscars, good genes seem to run in his family.
His brother too. I couldn't believe it when he referred to him as older. They both look younger.
Michael Fassbender does not look like he was born in 77 at all, but he wears his older looks well I think. It adds character.
I think Nicole's suspect too, she's allegedly 35, which would put her at 26 when the Pussycat Dolls launched i 2005...personally I think she was 30 then!
LOL that was a little harsh. I know she's done the Gladiators but really! On a side note there's some issues I fear of a lotta gin'n'bitter lemon drinkers commenting on some stunning ladies such as the truly amazeballs Fergie.
The 'truly amazeballs Fergie'? Dear soul, the most recent pictures of her, apparently after yet another diet, make her look about 69. I couldn't believe it. Same thing happened to Nigel Lawson after he went on a diet and lost a few stones - Lord, did he age. As for Ulrika, I'm afraid that skinny, bony look does nothing for me. Still, it must be a real pain for women to be judged on their looks.
Just watching W1A on iPlayer and Carol Vorderman turns up. Thinking that she was looking rather old (the wrinkled skin under her neck was the shocker), I looker up her birthday - December 24, 1960. That would make her 53. Don't want to be a bitch, but - I don't think so, no. Never. Not in a million years. At least early 60s (it's the skin and face generally).
The 'truly amazeballs Fergie'? Dear soul, the most recent pictures of her, apparently after yet another diet, make her look about 69. I couldn't believe it. Same thing happened to Nigel Lawson after he went on a diet and lost a few stones - Lord, did he age. As for Ulrika, I'm afraid that skinny, bony look does nothing for me. Still, it must be a real pain for women to be judged on their looks.
I think you're thinking of Sarah "Fergie" Ferguson.
AFAIK, the poster was talking about Fergie from the Black Eyed Peas. I wouldn't call her "truly amazeballs" personally (primarily, because I don't think anyone should ever use the word amazeballs).
Lots of people look older than their years - myself included. Max von Sydow was around 43 when he filmed the Exorcist and he played the older priest. He looked in his 60s at least.
On the other hand, there are lots of showbiz types who don't get their big break until their 30s and, knowing how careers can fizzle out as you age, they might say they were 25 rather than 30 odds if only to not get cast aside later. Actresses especially complain about there not being good roles for older women so seem very aware of their age. Not all, of course, but definitely a high percentage. Another thing is that the roles these actresses get as breakthroughs might be playing a teenager in a slasher movie or something similar so they might think they've a better chance of getting the role if they can pull off being 24 rather than 34.
I think you're thinking of Sarah "Fergie" Ferguson.
AFAIK, the poster was talking about Fergie from the Black Eyed Peas. I wouldn't call her "truly amazeballs" personally (primarily, because I don't think anyone should ever use the word amazeballs).
I learned earlier that former kids' TV presenter Dave Benson Phillips is 49. Perhaps I just overestimate a lot of people's ages but I always thought that he was about 40 when he was presenting the like of Get Your Own Back in the mid 90s!
I agree. Whilst she's undeniably attractive (in a high fashion, ultra skinny way) she sometimes looks like a well groomed lady in her mid to late forties. She has gorgeous brown eyes and dimples when she deems to smile, but the frozen, over stylized look does add years.
Agree. I think being very skinny has aged Victoria Beckham.
Chelsea Handler, always assumed she was in her mid 40s. Shocked she's only 39.:o
Comments
His brother too. I couldn't believe it when he referred to him as older. They both look younger.
Michael Fassbender does not look like he was born in 77 at all, but he wears his older looks well I think. It adds character.
katie price (all those procedures have ruined her looks.
She looked in her 30's when she was in Dream Team (Sky One) back in 2000/01
Jess said she's 28 in a recent episode.
No she hasn't, she referred to herself as being 28 in last week's episode.
Totally agree with this. I always think exactly the same thing. I absolutely cannot see these two as a couple. It freaks me out.
Sue Barker has looked about 102 since 1990.
Maybe early 60s.
She's infamous for flashing her ageing legs on Sky News.
A serious case of mutton dressed as lamb.
Staying with Emerdale, I was gobsmacked to learn Charlie Hardwick who plays Val Pollard is ONLY 52.:o:o
I would have seriously put her down as 65.:o:o
Looks like a bag whatever age she is.
The 'truly amazeballs Fergie'? Dear soul, the most recent pictures of her, apparently after yet another diet, make her look about 69. I couldn't believe it. Same thing happened to Nigel Lawson after he went on a diet and lost a few stones - Lord, did he age. As for Ulrika, I'm afraid that skinny, bony look does nothing for me. Still, it must be a real pain for women to be judged on their looks.
. . . or so she keeps telling us.
I think you're thinking of Sarah "Fergie" Ferguson.
AFAIK, the poster was talking about Fergie from the Black Eyed Peas. I wouldn't call her "truly amazeballs" personally (primarily, because I don't think anyone should ever use the word amazeballs).
On the other hand, there are lots of showbiz types who don't get their big break until their 30s and, knowing how careers can fizzle out as you age, they might say they were 25 rather than 30 odds if only to not get cast aside later. Actresses especially complain about there not being good roles for older women so seem very aware of their age. Not all, of course, but definitely a high percentage. Another thing is that the roles these actresses get as breakthroughs might be playing a teenager in a slasher movie or something similar so they might think they've a better chance of getting the role if they can pull off being 24 rather than 34.
Yes, that would make sense.
I always thought he was about 60.
SHOCK! He's only 50. :eek: Surely that cannot be right. I think someone's telling porkies there.
Peter Andre's face is ageing badly, possibly due to weight loss its gone a bit saggy looking. He looks a lot older than his years.
Ulrika Jonsson looks ancient.
Mel Gibson looks 20 years older than his true age these days.
Sarah Ferguson looks terrible for her age.
A lot of the women on Towie look years older than they claim, especially Frankie Essex and Jess Wright.
Victoria Beckham's face is starting to age badly too, IMO.
Pippa Middleton has an 'old' face.
Prince Edward and Prince Charles both look years older than their true age.
Courtney Stodden claims to be 19 years old but looks about 35.
*spits out coffee*
I agree.
Robbie Williams looks about 50.
Not sure about Peter Andre. But
Ulrika Jonsson looks about 75.
Mel Gibson's skin is awful. He looks about 70.
Not seen Sarah Ferguson for ages.
Most of the Towie people look over 40.
Not sure about Victoria Beckham.
Pippa Middleton looks about 45.
Not seen Prince Edward for ages, but Prince Charles does look older than his mother.
Courtney Stodden, yeah, she looks at least 35 like you say.
And Katie Hopkins has to be 60 AT LEAST.
I absolutely refuse to believe she's just a couple of years older than me.
Katie Hopkins claiming she's 38 is as rubbish as anything else the gob on legs has ever said. She looks closer to 68!!!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2576792/The-Queen-Prince-Phillip-arrive-prince-Edwards-50th-birthday.html
If he still had hair he'd look younger than 50 I think
Agree. I think being very skinny has aged Victoria Beckham.
Chelsea Handler, always assumed she was in her mid 40s. Shocked she's only 39.:o