Forums
 

The producers desire more hopefuls to behave like Frankie Cocozza


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25-06-2012, 11:40   #1
RodRuby93
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Services: Plusnet Broadband, Freesat from Sky, Sky+HD
Posts: 1,434
The producers desire more hopefuls to behave like Frankie Cocozza

It's a conspicuous indication that Simon Cowell still doesn't care about true talent after all, I've assumed this theory would come over 2 years back anyway.

http://www.metro.co.uk/tv/903147-the...rankie-cocozza

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...-Cocozzas.html
RodRuby93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 25-06-2012, 12:26   #2
Diceroll_81
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 593
' “But he had the right idea. Pop stars don’t stay in and ‘work on their vocals’, that’s just rubbish.

“They go out and get trashed and fall out of nightclubs. '


Erm, I think whoever said this is confusing pop stars with big brother and TOWIE contestants.

Even singers that you do see coming out of nighclubs work hard on their vocals and rehearse for their performances - they're just not photographed by the paps when they're doing it.

Plus, I don't think anyone sees X Factor contestants as 'pop stars' until they start having success after the show. Maybe it's just me though
Diceroll_81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2012, 12:59   #3
LunarLegend
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,452
If this is true then the producers have lost the plot!!
People like Frankie are the LAST thing we need for the show to improve!!!!

Is Simon really trying to kill off the X Factor UK?

What the show needs is another Leona Lewis not another Frankie Cokeupthenozza.

Why are the producers trying to turn the show into a mix of Big Brother,TOWIE and Made In Chelsea?
LunarLegend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2012, 13:06   #4
shaunnashines
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Manchester
Posts: 5,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by LunarLegend View Post
If this is true then the producers have lost the plot!!

What the show needs is another Leona Lewis not another Frankie Cokeupthenozza.

Why are the producers trying to turn the show into a mix of Big Brother,TOWIE and Made In Chelsea?
They want higher ratings!
shaunnashines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2012, 13:08   #5
LunarLegend
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaunnashines View Post
They want higher ratings!
Didn't work last year had two controversial characters and it did nothing in terms of getting the raitings higher people have finally got bored of controversial characters after all the rubbish the producers pulled back in series 7.
LunarLegend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2012, 13:08   #6
Satanel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North East, England.
Services: Ruth Lorenzo.
Posts: 10,696
It's just irresponsible in my opinion. The show is arguably idolized by the majority of the teenagers that watch it and encouraging contestants to 'go out and get trashed' is giving the wrong impression.
Satanel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2012, 13:10   #7
shaunnashines
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Manchester
Posts: 5,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by LunarLegend View Post
Didn't work last year had two controversial characters and it did nothing in terms of getting the raitings higher people have finally got bored of controversial characters after all the rubbish the producers pulled back in series 7.
Hmm true.
shaunnashines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2012, 15:29   #8
lumiere
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by LunarLegend View Post
Didn't work last year had two controversial characters and it did nothing in terms of getting the raitings higher people have finally got bored of controversial characters after all the rubbish the producers pulled back in series 7.
I think they have to be careful with what sort of controversy they court, and remember what sort of show it is. Those links talk about the X Factor being a 'cool' show? I'm not so sure. It is, essentially, a family entertainment show.

People like Katie Waissel/Jedward/Wagner are fine as they work like pantomime villains but Frankie Cocozza was constantly in the paper for his drinking, sex and drugs and I think he made the show seem, for a family show, not very family friendly.
lumiere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2012, 16:42   #9
RodRuby93
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Services: Plusnet Broadband, Freesat from Sky, Sky+HD
Posts: 1,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by lumiere View Post
I think they have to be careful with what sort of controversy they court, and remember what sort of show it is. Those links talk about the X Factor being a 'cool' show? I'm not so sure. It is, essentially, a family entertainment show.

People like Katie Waissel/Jedward/Wagner are fine as they work like pantomime villains but Frankie Cocozza was constantly in the paper for his drinking, sex and drugs and I think he made the show seem, for a family show, not very family friendly.
Same goes for Cher Lloyd's tattoos and her representation of the "chavvy" subculture that's obtrusive as well as pervasive within society as of today. Not to mention she is one of the prototypes that signifies everything wrong with the music industry.
RodRuby93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2012, 17:00   #10
LunarLegend
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by lumiere View Post
I think they have to be careful with what sort of controversy they court, and remember what sort of show it is. Those links talk about the X Factor being a 'cool' show? I'm not so sure. It is, essentially, a family entertainment show.

People like Katie Waissel/Jedward/Wagner are fine as they work like pantomime villains but Frankie Cocozza was constantly in the paper for his drinking, sex and drugs and I think he made the show seem, for a family show, not very family friendly.
You raise a point here my fear is if Frankie was worse than Wagner and Katie who were just the pantomime villains of the series does this mean the prducers will be looking for someone with worse antics than Frankie?
LunarLegend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2012, 19:09   #11
monrose
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaunnashines View Post
They want higher ratings!
Pretty ironic since the show lost two million viewers last year
monrose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2012, 19:45   #12
Fatfeatheryowl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 829
Quote:
Originally Posted by RodRuby93 View Post
Same goes for Cher Lloyd's tattoos and her representation of the "chavvy" subculture that's obtrusive as well as pervasive within society as of today. Not to mention she is one of the prototypes that signifies everything wrong with the music industry.
You forgot to mention pestilence, war, plague, and the world financial crisis which clearly had its origins in Malvern. Or maybe not eh?
Fatfeatheryowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2012, 21:21   #13
PJ1893
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
Posts: 894
Simon really needs to look back at what worked in previous series and at the success BGT had this year. I know they're two different shows but BGT had the balance of good judges chemistry, likeable and talented contestants (in the final at least), and it was a family friendly show which everyone could enjoy on a Saturday night.

I think part of the success of the Matt Cardle/1D/Wagner year was that the contestants attracted a wider audience. I know there was a little shock (Katie being saved all the time) but I don't think that's what brought in the viewers in the end.

The article is all 'sources say' so hopefully it's not true.
PJ1893 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2012, 21:26   #14
LunarLegend
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ1893 View Post
Simon really needs to look back at what worked in previous series and at the success BGT had this year. I know they're two different shows but BGT had the balance of good judges chemistry, likeable and talented contestants (in the final at least), and it was a family friendly show which everyone could enjoy on a Saturday night.

I think part of the success of the Matt Cardle/1D/Wagner year was that the contestants attracted a wider audience. I know there was a little shock (Katie being saved all the time) but I don't think that's what brought in the viewers in the end.

The article is all 'sources say' so hopefully it's not true.
I remember that article last year saying the producers were looking for good looking models and giving them a free pass to the judges rounds even if they couldn't sing a note in tune and this tuned out to be complete utter lies!!
LunarLegend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-06-2012, 22:40   #15
Soppyfan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: My DJ Studio
Services: XF Games Host/Mentor
Posts: 12,370
It's official, they want X Factor to be the new Big Brother...the axe is certain to fall on this show after this one.
Soppyfan is online now Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 02:43   #16
Order
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaunnashines View Post
They want higher ratings!
I'm not too sure if my ratings are correct, but the last time I checked:

TOWIE - on average 1.5m ratings
Geordie Shore - God knows, who actually watches that? Probably around 400k and I'm being generous there
Big Brother 1.5 - 2m

The X Factor - 10m.

I'm not quite sure why they've come to the conclusion that a TOWIE type show will work in their favour. TXF batters all of those shows in ratings and that's because it's nothing like them so I don't know why they're 'chasing' that crowd - who probably already watch the show anyway.

People are tuning OUT because of all that rubbish, adding to it is going to continue to drive people away, but I think that's what Simon wants now. I think he's bored of the show and wants to make way for a brand new show - that maybe doesn't involve singing.
Order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 07:05   #17
Sun Tzu.
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,095
They don't want it more like TOWIE etc. But I do think they have seen the Voice, what a disaster it has been because the contestants had nothing about them. So if they can get a new Jedward or Wagner or Cocozza, some one like that, then they will take it.

They need characters which will get people talking and people tuning in to see them. It sells papers, free publicity.
Sun Tzu. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 09:54   #18
shaunnashines
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Manchester
Posts: 5,384
Ok maybe not higher ratings, the producers want it to be the most talked about show!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Tzu. View Post

They need characters which will get people talking and people tuning in to see them. It sells papers, free publicity.
shaunnashines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 14:03   #19
Eurostar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 36,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diceroll_81 View Post
' “But he had the right idea. Pop stars don’t stay in and ‘work on their vocals’, that’s just rubbish.

“They go out and get trashed and fall out of nightclubs. '


Erm, I think whoever said this is confusing pop stars with big brother and TOWIE contestants.

Even singers that you do see coming out of nighclubs work hard on their vocals and rehearse for their performances - they're just not photographed by the paps when they're doing it.

Plus, I don't think anyone sees X Factor contestants as 'pop stars' until they start having success after the show. Maybe it's just me though
Spot on : the X Factor's definition of what makes a pop star is clearly very different to everyone else's.

Most of the famous pop stars in history took their music and their singing very seriously....the music was their prime motivation in their lives and the fame, money etc was more of a sideshow. The reason they stayed successful is because they wanted to make great music and to entertain their audience, not because they wanted to fall drunk out of nightclubs.

I remember a journalist who spent a weekend backstage at the XF last autumn saying whatever X Factor is, it has absolutely nothing to do with music or the music industry. It's just a money making operation and ratings spinner for Cowell and ITV.
Eurostar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 14:17   #20
abrightyz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: kingston upon thames, surrey
Services: zayn malik
Posts: 9,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Tzu. View Post
They don't want it more like TOWIE etc. But I do think they have seen the Voice, what a disaster it has been because the contestants had nothing about them. So if they can get a new Jedward or Wagner or Cocozza, some one like that, then they will take it.

They need characters which will get people talking and people tuning in to see them. It sells papers, free publicity.
but with cocozza, it's likely they actually had more people tuning out than tuning in...
abrightyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 14:23   #21
LunarLegend
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,452
'But he had the right idea. Pop stars don't stay in and "work on their vocals"

"They go out and get trashed and fall out of nightclubs."

Big Brother and Towie contestants maybe but this isn't the way to go about a music career at all, shaunnashines did raise a great point although people like Frankie don't get raiting they get newspaper headlines.
LunarLegend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 15:12   #22
Eurostar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 36,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by LunarLegend View Post
'But he had the right idea. Pop stars don't stay in and "work on their vocals"

"They go out and get trashed and fall out of nightclubs."

Big Brother and Towie contestants maybe but this isn't the way to go about a music career at all, shaunnashines did raise a great point although people like Frankie don't get raiting they get newspaper headlines.
For "pop stars", substitute the phrase "reality TV contestants".......it's the X Factor who are trying to present these talentless nonentities as bona fide pop stars.
Eurostar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-06-2012, 15:19   #23
Parneb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satanel View Post
It's just irresponsible in my opinion. The show is arguably idolized by the majority of the teenagers that watch it and encouraging contestants to 'go out and get trashed' is giving the wrong impression.

I so agree with you.

I don't want the X Factor to continue going down the road of Trash TV.
Parneb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2012, 14:57   #24
Nastyman69
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,384
Frank-ly speaking, there are too many hopefuls doing CokeUpTheNozza
Nastyman69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2012, 17:30   #25
bigbro24
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,178
I'll take this with a pinch of salt. They kicked Frankie off because he went to far
also weren't a few acts kicked off at the judges houses last year for just for having sex.
I'd be surprised if the producers wanted X Factor to be spiced up in this way. Someone like Frankie is just a nuisance for the producers to control.
bigbro24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:19.