Forums
 

should free view viewers pay to watch tv


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-07-2012, 21:37   #1
zoepaulpenny
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: , the god's garden
Posts: 6,654
should free view viewers pay to watch tv

I heard on the news, that bbc want to charge viewers to watch free view, do you think this will happen??? and should it??? i say no!!!
zoepaulpenny is online now   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 02-07-2012, 21:50   #2
barky99
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,048
is this instead of licence fee?
barky99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2012, 21:53   #3
zoepaulpenny
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: , the god's garden
Posts: 6,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by barky99 View Post
is this instead of licence fee?
hell no.. as well as...
zoepaulpenny is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2012, 21:54   #4
chrisjr
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Reading
Services: Freeview [LG TV, Humax PVR], DAB, Wireless Broadband [Now]
Posts: 17,523
I suspect you may have misheard what was said. I would be extremely surprised if the BBC had any pay per view plans as that would more than likely require a re-write of their charter!

Are you sure it wasn't a discussion on whether or not Freeview viewers should have to pay for filters if they get interference from the proposed new 4G mobile services?
chrisjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2012, 22:37   #5
iangrad
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 586
The idea of "freeview" is that its FREE to view the clue might be in the name !!!

If any government was to even suggest they would allow any broadcaster to charge , they would be voted out of power before you could even spell coalition !
iangrad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2012, 22:41   #6
mac2708
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,783
Where/when did you hear this? A Google finds nothing except this oldish news
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...catalogue.html
mac2708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 01:47   #7
jenzie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: BUDDIETOWN
Services: VM Broadband - sky SD
Posts: 12,765
SECOND time they've mentioned this ..... so don't put much credence in it myself!
jenzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 02:07   #8
Daveoc64
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bristol (BBC1 West)
Services: Sky+ HD, Virgin Media 100mbps, Three - "The One Plan", Spotify Premium
Posts: 14,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny View Post
I heard on the news, that bbc want to charge viewers to watch free view,
No

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny View Post
do you think this will happen???
No

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny View Post
and should it???
No

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny View Post
i say no!!!
Also no!
Daveoc64 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 09:36   #9
call100
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,368
As someone else posted.....It was a discussion about who should pay for the filters required by Freeview viewers when 4G comes in..........Sheesh! As if it's not bad enough in the Country already, someone is thinking to pay for free TV.....
call100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 09:59   #10
XxBlaKOuTZxX
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Edinburgh / Scotland
Services: Sam 3DTV/3D HT. SKY world HD/3D. Humax hdr-T2. XBL GT ix Hellstorm x
Posts: 2,773
Don't you think we pay enough for the crap they show already
XxBlaKOuTZxX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 13:26   #11
zoepaulpenny
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: , the god's garden
Posts: 6,654
ok i must of mis-heard the news being read.. oooppps..

will all free view be affected by the new 4g services???
i can remember when i had to buy a filter for people using C B RADIO years ago.
zoepaulpenny is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 14:02   #12
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 34,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny View Post
will all free view be affected by the new 4g services???
It remains to be seen yet what effect (if any) 4G will have on TV reception - and if it does presumably 4G will be responsible for fitting filters etc.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 14:05   #13
mac2708
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,783
Deleted duplicated post
mac2708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 14:05   #14
chrisjr
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Reading
Services: Freeview [LG TV, Humax PVR], DAB, Wireless Broadband [Now]
Posts: 17,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny View Post
ok i must of mis-heard the news being read.. oooppps..

will all free view be affected by the new 4g services???
i can remember when i had to buy a filter for people using C B RADIO years ago.
No body can say with 100% certainty what effect it will have.

Since the new 4G service will be using the part of the band that used to be used for TV services on UHF channels above 60 there is potential for these signals to be picked up by a TV aerial.

How much signal is picked up will depend to some extent on the type of aerial and the location of the 4G mast(s) relative to the aerial.

The likelihood is that most people won't be seriously affected but there have been figures of as many as 2 million households that could be affected, which, if true, is not exactly a tiny minority however.
chrisjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 14:06   #15
mac2708
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny View Post
ok i must of mis-heard the news being read.. oooppps..

will all free view be affected by the new 4g services???
i can remember when i had to buy a filter for people using C B RADIO years ago.
It was fairly old news anyway.
This is from 23/05/2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18174052

See also http://www.itpro.co.uk/641491/freevi...erference-bill

and
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=fr...w=1024&bih=643
mac2708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 21:31   #16
zoepaulpenny
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: , the god's garden
Posts: 6,654
well thanks for the clarification guys! when will this happen??
zoepaulpenny is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 09:20   #17
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 34,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny View Post
well thanks for the clarification guys! when will this happen??
No one knows, or even if there will be any problems - the bandwidth hasn't even been sold yet (although Blair long since spent the money).
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 19:37   #18
Gary Brenton
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Walsall (West Midlands)
Services: Freeview/ Talk Talk Broadband/ Teac CRH-258i/ Bowers & Wilkins DM-303
Posts: 616
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisjr View Post
No body can say with 100% certainty what effect it will have.

Since the new 4G service will be using the part of the band that used to be used for TV services on UHF channels above 60 there is potential for these signals to be picked up by a TV aerial.

How much signal is picked up will depend to some extent on the type of aerial and the location of the 4G mast(s) relative to the aerial.

The likelihood is that most people won't be seriously affected but there have been figures of as many as 2 million households that could be affected, which, if true, is not exactly a tiny minority however.
I remember all the issues when freeview came into force that everyone needed a new aerial...yet i know people who have a rusty aerial that has been up 20 years or so that does the job ok
Gary Brenton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 19:59   #19
grahamlthompson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Services: Humax9200T Toppy5800 Foxsat HDR Sony KDL-40W4000 TV Denon AVR4306 amp
Posts: 14,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Brenton View Post
I remember all the issues when freeview came into force that everyone needed a new aerial...yet i know people who have a rusty aerial that has been up 20 years or so that does the job ok
http://www.paras.org.uk/

Some cowboys have made a fortune out this con.
grahamlthompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 21:04   #20
chrisjr
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Reading
Services: Freeview [LG TV, Humax PVR], DAB, Wireless Broadband [Now]
Posts: 17,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Brenton View Post
I remember all the issues when freeview came into force that everyone needed a new aerial...yet i know people who have a rusty aerial that has been up 20 years or so that does the job ok
You been poking about on my roof again??
chrisjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 21:20   #21
Tassium
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: It's Grim
Services: MK2 Interocitor
Posts: 13,061
I'm sure the BBC don't want viewers to have to pay for the "filters", that's their whole point.
Tassium is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 00:09   #22
Winston_1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Brenton View Post
I remember all the issues when freeview came into force that everyone needed a new aerial...
I don't remember that. It was always stated that existing aerials would be OK in the majority of cases.
Winston_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 00:32   #23
Gary Brenton
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Walsall (West Midlands)
Services: Freeview/ Talk Talk Broadband/ Teac CRH-258i/ Bowers & Wilkins DM-303
Posts: 616
Quote:
Originally Posted by XxBlaKOuTZxX View Post
Don't you think we pay enough for the crap they show already
I agree....20 odd years ago we had 4 channels with more variety and was spolied for choice of a saturday night....plus the licence fee was much cheaper... NOW we have 70 odd channels with little or nothing worth watching.

IMO: Free-View is exactly what is says on the tin... 'FREE'
Gary Brenton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 09:59   #24
Peter the Great
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Brenton View Post
I agree....20 odd years ago we had 4 channels with more variety and was spolied for choice of a saturday night....plus the licence fee was much cheaper... NOW we have 70 odd channels with little or nothing worth watching.

IMO: Free-View is exactly what is says on the tin... 'FREE'
Still wearing the rose tinted spectacles I see.
Peter the Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 10:10   #25
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 34,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winston_1 View Post
I don't remember that. It was always stated that existing aerials would be OK in the majority of cases.
Exactly, it was the usual media inaccuracies that promoted the myth that new aerials were required.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:52.