Forums
 

Tom Cruise - Jack Reacher trailer (aka novel One Shot)


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-07-2012, 12:19   #26
Saigo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devon Miles View Post
The pic of him sitting on the chair is Reacher IMO
Yeah, pretty much what I picture when I read the books.

Oh, what could have been...
Saigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 04-07-2012, 12:54   #27
peon
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Services: Nickel and Dime
Posts: 1,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edmond-Dantès View Post
6-foot-5, a 50 inch chest and blonde hair to be precise. None of which apply to Cruise in this adaptation.
perhaps they'll wheel him out in the Lestat wig and heels?
peon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012, 13:36   #28
SXTony
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saigo View Post
Daniel Craig is about 5'10 and already leads a franchise.

Ray Stevenson who I linked to. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0829032/
He was my first thought too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saigo View Post
He looks too old and not enough of a ladykiller.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saigo View Post
doesn't look powerful enough.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saigo View Post
He's good, perhaps a touch too young and flavour of the month at the moment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saigo View Post
Him, I can't stand. I've no idea why though.

Any of those are better than Cruise though. And I really like Tom Cruise.

It's a shame that they chose to go with a big name star as that probably means a big pay packet and the need to make more money at the box office. Even though I'm a fan of the books, they're really pretty standard tough guy vs bad guy fare. I can't really see this being a big box office hit and spawning a franchise of of it. Now if they'd gone with a less well known actor (who looked more the part) and a smaller budget, I think it would have been more likely we'd see a series of Reacher movies.
SXTony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 08:25   #29
Saigo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,042
Saw the trailer...

...looks terrible. Cruise is just being Cruise. It's like Ethan Hunt has been dropped in - does Cruise ever even do a different voice? As soon as I heard him speak, it was clear that he wasn't bringing anything new or different.

If they wanted to make a film about a brown haired, 5'6" former homicide detective who likes fast cars then they could have done that and called him whatever.

Why is this supposed to be Reacher? I think a better route would have been to go down the US cable series route. They have the same production values as most movies and you could have had a series of 2 or 3 parters based on the books, with an actor who can 'become' Jack Reacher.

This film just seems pointless and I have never been so irritated watching a trailer!
Saigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 09:19   #30
Mr Perks
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Devon
Posts: 965
It wouldn't be quite so bad if every book didn't make repeated comment on Reacher's size and appearance. It gets laughable in some of the books, how frequently the author feels the need to reinforce this image. So anyone who has read the books, and I have read a fair few of them, has this image in mind and probably has spent an idle moment or two casting him in an imaginary film. In any potential short list I am sure Cruise would never, ever appear. The idea is so ridiculous, the trailer comes across as a comedy film trailer.
If Lee Child is happy with it all, all I can think it must be a case of being extreme star-stricken, a huge rights cheque or a sudden absoption into the Church of Scientology and he is 'just following orders'.
Mr Perks is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 12:42   #31
Dai13371
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ammanford, South Wales
Services: Ospreys TV
Posts: 7,740
Excellent stuff. Just what I have always wanted. Filmakers pissing all over a favourite literary character of mine. Lee Child hang your head in shame because you attempted to justify this sad miscasting with explanations of metaphor instead of fighting your corner.

Ray Stevenson was and should have been the man for the job.

Oh well. It all fits I suppose. Child says he named his (anti)hero Reacher because Child had difficultly in reaching up to get groceries on the highest shelf of the supermarket.....something him and Cruise would share I guess.
Dai13371 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 12:45   #32
starsailor
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,431
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saigo View Post
Saw the trailer...

...looks terrible. Cruise is just being Cruise. It's like Ethan Hunt has been dropped in - does Cruise ever even do a different voice? As soon as I heard him speak, it was clear that he wasn't bringing anything new or different.

If they wanted to make a film about a brown haired, 5'6" former homicide detective who likes fast cars then they could have done that and called him whatever.

Why is this supposed to be Reacher? I think a better route would have been to go down the US cable series route. They have the same production values as most movies and you could have had a series of 2 or 3 parters based on the books, with an actor who can 'become' Jack Reacher.

This film just seems pointless and I have never been so irritated watching a trailer!
I agree, it's not as if the Reacher books are big blockbuster stuff anyway, it would have been more than possible for the books to be done on a TV budget.

Seems as though a whole lot of money was thrown at Lee Child and he thought 'ah sod it'. This is just feeding Cruises ego, and it's not as if he doesn't already have a successful blockbuster franchise anyway.
starsailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 13:09   #33
wildhollie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: U.K.
Services: Jack Shepherd's beard.
Posts: 2,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by TH14 View Post
Why on earth did they cast him as Jack Reacher who is supposed to be a man mountain
Becuase the little pipsqueak bought the rights so he could cast himself in the role !
wildhollie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 13:27   #34
Saigo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dai13371 View Post
Oh well. It all fits I suppose. Child says he named his (anti)hero Reacher because Child had difficultly in reaching up to get groceries on the highest shelf of the supermarket.....something him and Cruise would share I guess.
Actually, Lee Child is very tall. The name came from when Child was unemployed and working on his first novel, he was at the supermarket and shorter people kept asking him to get stuff for them.

His wife said "If the writing career doesn't take off, you could always get a job as a reacher."

He liked the name and gave it to his as-yet-unnamed character.
Saigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 13:45   #35
Dai13371
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ammanford, South Wales
Services: Ospreys TV
Posts: 7,740
Oh well, I got some of it right

Thanks Saigo.
Dai13371 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-10-2012, 22:01   #36
Chuck Rules
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Luton
Services: Sky+, Sky Broadband
Posts: 56
Worst. Casting. Ever
Chuck Rules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 13:25   #37
Saigo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,042
Against my better judgement, I watched the new trailer.

Awful.

Tom Cruise being Tom Cruise. Delivering every line like Tom Cruise in the Tom Cruise voice.

Could be any other of his "characters".

Would have been good if he had just said "look, I love the character but I am not right for this role". We could then have an actor who would get in character and portray Reacher as he is in the books.

The dialogue was awful too - "on second thought, I would really like to kill you"
Saigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 14:05   #38
Johnny Clay
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,953
^ The new trailer is pretty rank, isn't it.

Cruise can largely pull it off in the fantasy world of M:I, but you stiffle a titter at 'gritty' tough guy Tom.

And that awful jokey bit with the cap at the end seemed a different tone entirely.
Johnny Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 14:10   #39
Rorschach
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Folkestone
Services: Virgin Media XL & HD V+
Posts: 8,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saigo View Post
Against my better judgement, I watched the new trailer.

Awful.

Tom Cruise being Tom Cruise. Delivering every line like Tom Cruise in the Tom Cruise voice.

Could be any other of his "characters".
When I saw the teaser trailer I did just think that it could be the next installment in the Mission Impossible franchise, I couldn't see anything to differentiate Reacher from Hunt.

Obviously there wasn't a lot to go but all the same...
Rorschach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-10-2012, 17:52   #40
Saigo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Clay View Post
And that awful jokey bit with the cap at the end seemed a different tone entirely.
I think this is another subtle(ish) slap in the face to fans of the books. It is mentioned several times in the novels that Reacher finds it difficult to blend in - in a crowd he is six inches taller than those around him, his big build, battered features and disposable clothing don't help either, nor does arriving at new places with no luggage. Basically, Reacher stands out.

Just another thing wrong with this movie.
Saigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-10-2012, 18:00   #41
Mandark
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Derby
Services: Sky HD, Freeview, Aol, Xbox, PS3, iPad, iPhone, Android
Posts: 17,715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Rules View Post
Worst. Casting. Ever
Mandark is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:19.