multiplex 7 and 8 |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Services: sky for everything
Posts: 790
|
multiplex 7 and 8
if they added multiplex 7 to freeview they could move the hd channels to this multiplex and give multiplex b back for sd channels.
they could even create multiplex 8 for more hd channels. this can be done. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Somersets Mighty Mendip Tx!
Services: Bravia 40EX403, HDR-FOX T2, Kef iQ50's, Tannoy Mercury Series, WDTV Live
Posts: 8,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Services: sky for everything
Posts: 790
|
with more space they wouldnt need to cram so many channels and affect picture quality
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Sussex
Services: Freeview (Crystal Palace TX), Plusnet Unlimited Fibre (80/20)
Posts: 2,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Norwich, Tacolneston tx
Services: Plusnet Broadband, Freeview, FTA DSat, DAB.
Posts: 19,182
|
What you suggest were possibilities before it became likely (though still not certain) that the part of the UHF band above 700Mhz will be cleared to be sold off.
If that comes to pass, it is now likely that most of the spare capacity lower down (basically UHF channels 31 to 37) will be needed to accomodate existing services displaced by the clearance. There might still be some additional capacity found, but it is now much less likely. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London, UK
Services: HTPC with Sky+ HD (Sports & Movies) + Freeview HD
Posts: 2,678
|
lol @ thinking quality will ever increase. If 2 new multiplexes were added, you can be sure they'd be filled with more and more useless channels, rather than used to boost the quality of the existing ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Sussex
Services: Freeview (Crystal Palace TX), Plusnet Unlimited Fibre (80/20)
Posts: 2,049
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Norwich, Tacolneston tx
Services: Plusnet Broadband, Freeview, FTA DSat, DAB.
Posts: 19,182
|
Quote:
This is what they have in mind if you haven't seen it already. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/bin...egy/arqiva.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Services: The ⓩorro of ⓩero
Posts: 5,313
|
Quote:
Or just use multiplex 7 for SD channels. But as others have said unlikely |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Swansea
Services: Sony 32", Sky+HD, PS3, XBOX 360, Wii, Sky World+ESPN, Phone Line, BB Max
Posts: 1,311
|
Quote:
Id prefer 15 FULL HD channels over 150 SD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 68
|
1 SD channel = 10 SD channels ?
If that's the case I would rather have a mixture 10 HD and the rest SD but with no +1 channels . But there is no chance of this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Andover, Hampshire, UK
Services: DTT, Freesat, DAB, FM
Posts: 3,571
|
No - the biggest HD mux has 5 HD channels. The biggest SD mux (that can be received by SD receivers) currently has 12 SD channels. You could fit more SD channels into the HD mux - I'd hazard a guess of up to 20 if you really squeezed them in - but then they'd only be able to be received on HD receivers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London, UK
Services: HTPC with Sky+ HD (Sports & Movies) + Freeview HD
Posts: 2,678
|
Nah a DVB-T2 mux using AVC could fit 20 SD channels quite comfortably. Quality would be higher than most Freeview channels now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Services: BT, Sky, Virgin Media, Freeview and Freesat and Virgin Media 120MB BB
Posts: 6,533
|
multiplex 7 and 8
What about the new Compression Technology?
www.hevc.info/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London, UK
Services: HTPC with Sky+ HD (Sports & Movies) + Freeview HD
Posts: 2,678
|
Yes, if they adopted that, it'd roughly double the efficiency. So 40 SD channels or 10 HD channels per DVB-T2 multiplex.
If they ever did switch the system so that all multiplexes were DVB-T2, they should switch to HEVC at the same time. However, HEVC is a few years away from being ready to be in mass market set top boxes yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,193
|
I think you mean more and more money making opportunities.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:26.



