Forums
 

multiplex 7 and 8


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-07-2012, 15:37   #1
philyb
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Services: sky for everything
Posts: 790
multiplex 7 and 8

if they added multiplex 7 to freeview they could move the hd channels to this multiplex and give multiplex b back for sd channels.

they could even create multiplex 8 for more hd channels. this can be done.
philyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 06-07-2012, 15:46   #2
lstar337
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Somersets Mighty Mendip Tx!
Services: Bravia 40EX403, HDR-FOX T2, Kef iQ50's, Tannoy Mercury Series, WDTV Live
Posts: 8,942
Quote:
Originally Posted by philyb View Post
if they added multiplex 7 to freeview they could move the hd channels to this multiplex and give multiplex b back for sd channels.

they could even create multiplex 8 for more hd channels. this can be done.
Sure, because magic exists.
lstar337 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 17:13   #3
philyb
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Services: sky for everything
Posts: 790
with more space they wouldnt need to cram so many channels and affect picture quality
philyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 17:27   #4
kasg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Sussex
Services: Freeview (Crystal Palace TX), Plusnet Unlimited Fibre (80/20)
Posts: 2,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by philyb View Post
with more space they wouldnt need to cram so many channels and affect picture quality
Yes, but where do you propose to conjure up the space from?
kasg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 17:27   #5
Spot
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Norwich, Tacolneston tx
Services: Plusnet Broadband, Freeview, FTA DSat, DAB.
Posts: 19,182
What you suggest were possibilities before it became likely (though still not certain) that the part of the UHF band above 700Mhz will be cleared to be sold off.

If that comes to pass, it is now likely that most of the spare capacity lower down (basically UHF channels 31 to 37) will be needed to accomodate existing services displaced by the clearance. There might still be some additional capacity found, but it is now much less likely.
Spot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 17:29   #6
DragonQ
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London, UK
Services: HTPC with Sky+ HD (Sports & Movies) + Freeview HD
Posts: 2,678
lol @ thinking quality will ever increase. If 2 new multiplexes were added, you can be sure they'd be filled with more and more useless channels, rather than used to boost the quality of the existing ones.
DragonQ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 17:34   #7
kasg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Sussex
Services: Freeview (Crystal Palace TX), Plusnet Unlimited Fibre (80/20)
Posts: 2,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spot View Post
If that comes to pass, it is now likely that most of the spare capacity lower down (basically UHF channels 31 to 37) will be needed to accomodate existing services displaced by the clearance. There might still be some additional capacity found, but it is now much less likely.
A 700MHz clearance would surely put the pressure on to move to DVB-T2. I think the push for this has to start NOW, the sooner non-DVB-T2 equipment is phased out, the better.
kasg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 17:39   #8
Spot
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Norwich, Tacolneston tx
Services: Plusnet Broadband, Freeview, FTA DSat, DAB.
Posts: 19,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by kasg View Post
A 700MHz clearance would surely put the pressure on to move to DVB-T2. I think the push for this has to start NOW, the sooner non-DVB-T2 equipment is phased out, the better.
Yes I am sure that would be part of the plan, and the COM muxs (at least) would have to be run as single frequency networks, either regionally or nationally.

This is what they have in mind if you haven't seen it already.

http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/bin...egy/arqiva.pdf
Spot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 23:09   #9
AxG
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Services: The ⓩorro of ⓩero
Posts: 5,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by philyb View Post
if they added multiplex 7 to freeview they could move the hd channels to this multiplex and give multiplex b back for sd channels.

they could even create multiplex 8 for more hd channels. this can be done.
So remove HD channels from relays? Not really sensible.
Or just use multiplex 7 for SD channels.

But as others have said unlikely
AxG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 01:09   #10
Dansky+HD
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Swansea
Services: Sony 32", Sky+HD, PS3, XBOX 360, Wii, Sky World+ESPN, Phone Line, BB Max
Posts: 1,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by philyb View Post
if they added multiplex 7 to freeview they could move the hd channels to this multiplex and give multiplex b back for sd channels.

they could even create multiplex 8 for more hd channels. this can be done.
I'm in favour if this would create space for more HD channels.

Id prefer 15 FULL HD channels over 150 SD.
Dansky+HD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 08:31   #11
seafra
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 68
1 SD channel = 10 SD channels ?

If that's the case I would rather have a mixture
10 HD and the rest SD but with no +1 channels .

But there is no chance of this.
seafra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 16:19   #12
Muzer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Andover, Hampshire, UK
Services: DTT, Freesat, DAB, FM
Posts: 3,571
No - the biggest HD mux has 5 HD channels. The biggest SD mux (that can be received by SD receivers) currently has 12 SD channels. You could fit more SD channels into the HD mux - I'd hazard a guess of up to 20 if you really squeezed them in - but then they'd only be able to be received on HD receivers.
Muzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2012, 17:14   #13
DragonQ
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London, UK
Services: HTPC with Sky+ HD (Sports & Movies) + Freeview HD
Posts: 2,678
Nah a DVB-T2 mux using AVC could fit 20 SD channels quite comfortably. Quality would be higher than most Freeview channels now.
DragonQ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 00:40   #14
joshua_welby
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Services: BT, Sky, Virgin Media, Freeview and Freesat and Virgin Media 120MB BB
Posts: 6,533
multiplex 7 and 8

What about the new Compression Technology?
www.hevc.info/
joshua_welby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 10:07   #15
DragonQ
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: London, UK
Services: HTPC with Sky+ HD (Sports & Movies) + Freeview HD
Posts: 2,678
Yes, if they adopted that, it'd roughly double the efficiency. So 40 SD channels or 10 HD channels per DVB-T2 multiplex.

If they ever did switch the system so that all multiplexes were DVB-T2, they should switch to HEVC at the same time. However, HEVC is a few years away from being ready to be in mass market set top boxes yet.
DragonQ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2012, 09:48   #16
figrin_dan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by DragonQ View Post
lol @ thinking quality will ever increase. If 2 new multiplexes were added, you can be sure they'd be filled with more and more useless channels, rather than used to boost the quality of the existing ones.
I think you mean more and more money making opportunities.
figrin_dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:26.