"A technological quantum leap for the entire satellite industry" |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,643
|
"A technological quantum leap for the entire satellite industry"
I'm no techie, so wondered what those who know more about the technical side of satellite thought of this?
http://www.ses.com/satip |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: A small Greek island
Services: Slingbox/Freesat
Posts: 2,069
|
In view of the difficulty in distributing HD around a building, and in view of the prevalence of "tablet" computers, SAT -> IP seems like a logical step.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bradford, W Yorks
Services: Sky+HD, Freeview(s), Sky+, Sky Broadband
Posts: 124
|
Is this part of Sky's plan to enable multi-room boxes to view recordings from the 'main' box (which had been mentioned peviously on the forum)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wrexham
Posts: 8,738
|
I mentioned this back in May, see post number 4
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1659340 Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Services: I'm lucky just to have mains water & electricity.
Posts: 4,442
|
I always thought that quantum leaps were very, very, very small... ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Services: Topfield & Digitalstream Freeview, Humax Freesat, Youview, Acer Revo IPTV
Posts: 19,667
|
A quantum leap is capable of taking you (or at least a fundemental particle) to any part of the universe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 34,054
|
Quote:
![]() Unless I've missed something? - isn't a just a satellite box with CAT5 out instead of HDMI/SCART? - and presumably capable of supporting multiple separate channels. Sounds like a more recent development of the original Pace scheme, which called for a master box and multiple slaves (but which didn't use CAT5 of course). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: near Hell,
Services: BE Internet, $kyHD + pace V1, DTT , 19.2+28.2°E+30°W
Posts: 3,885
|
not exactly a new idea, I've been able to stream live satellite tv over my lan via my media center pc for years.
only difference is this solution appears to be compatible with a few more devices. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,643
|
"A technological quantum leap for the entire satellite industry" is a bold claim to make. In essence, do people think this is founded or unfounded?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,216
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CHESHIRE Satellite Installer
Services: Motorised Satellite * 42 satellites * 10000 channels + HD 3D 75e-w
Posts: 1,804
|
Quote:
Time will.......[buffering]....... tell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Services: All Digital platforms
Posts: 4,301
|
It is just a domestic version of what some broadcasters - have been doing for years - like NPR PRSS "Content Depot" which is now about 10 years old.. ... (except it did not have WLAN!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 34,054
|
Not at all - as I said above, it's only a very small change - essentially based on a very old proposal by Pace, demonstrated years ago.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:54.




