Forums
 

IR remote extender over mains plug?


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-07-2012, 11:05   #1
dadioflex
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,539
IR remote extender over mains plug?

So you can get magic eye extenders that use a radio signal to send key presses to your Sky box (or whatever) in a different room, but they're notoriously poor.

You can get home network extenders that work over your internal mains wiring and they generally work very well.

Can you get something that combines the two, an IR extender that works over the mains wiring?

I've searched but either I'm just not using the right terms or it doesn't exist.
dadioflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 05-07-2012, 11:09   #2
gomezz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Services: Topfield & Digitalstream Freeview, Humax Freesat, Youview, Acer Revo IPTV
Posts: 19,668
Sounds like bright idea that no-one has marketed yet. Perhaps you should contact one of the usual suspects who make AV accessories to see if they think it is a goer?
gomezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 11:23   #3
grahamlthompson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Services: Humax9200T Toppy5800 Foxsat HDR Sony KDL-40W4000 TV Denon AVR4306 amp
Posts: 14,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by dadioflex View Post
So you can get magic eye extenders that use a radio signal to send key presses to your Sky box (or whatever) in a different room, but they're notoriously poor.

You can get home network extenders that work over your internal mains wiring and they generally work very well.

Can you get something that combines the two, an IR extender that works over the mains wiring?

I've searched but either I'm just not using the right terms or it doesn't exist.
Presumably you have some sort of physical connection from where you want to transmit remote signals to be able to watch what you are controlling. There are existing solutions to use this to pass remote control back to the video source.

For coax connections you can use Sky magic eyes with a suitable converter box (Triax Trilink).

For hdmi

http://www.hdcable.co.uk/ir-over-hdm...c-eye-kit.html

Baluns with ir transfer are available for cat5 HD links.
grahamlthompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 11:35   #4
dadioflex
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,539
It's for my mum's new house. It's set up so she can watch what's on the Sky box in the front room in her bedroom, but she can't change channels. there's no problem with the video signal, just the remote control. We've been told the GHz IR transmitters are a waste of time, and my own experiences would bear this out.

I have personal experience of using homeplug network extenders to network computers without running cat5 cabling. You plug in 2 or more units and "pair" them all and it creates a virtual computer network using your existing mains wiring.

Like this:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/TP-Link-TL-P...dp/B004INVKP4/

What I'm surprised nobody seems to have made is something that combines a Magic Eye transmitter with the mains wiring network. For instance, theoretically I could have two computers plugged into such a mains network and do exactly what I want. One computer could receive the signal, transmit a message over the mains to the other computer which would then output that same signal using a USB IR blaster. But that would be overkill.

At this stage I'm fairly certain no-one has made one yet.

edit: in retrospect I'm thinking that most of the poor performance with the AV senders is down to sending the picture, which I don't need to do. From what I've read the IR part is the bit that usually works okay. Hmm. Going to try a cheap IR extender and see how it works. Easier than re-inventing the wheel, right?
dadioflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 12:03   #5
chrisjr
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Reading
Services: Freeview [LG TV, Humax PVR], DAB, Wireless Broadband [Now]
Posts: 17,526
But how are you sending the signal from box to telly at the moment then?

As has been pointed out above if you have some sort of link between the two then that are options already available to do the remote control.
chrisjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 12:19   #6
grahamlthompson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Services: Humax9200T Toppy5800 Foxsat HDR Sony KDL-40W4000 TV Denon AVR4306 amp
Posts: 14,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by dadioflex View Post
It's for my mum's new house. It's set up so she can watch what's on the Sky box in the front room in her bedroom, but she can't change channels. there's no problem with the video signal, just the remote control. We've been told the GHz IR transmitters are a waste of time, and my own experiences would bear this out.

I have personal experience of using homeplug network extenders to network computers without running cat5 cabling. You plug in 2 or more units and "pair" them all and it creates a virtual computer network using your existing mains wiring.

Like this:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/TP-Link-TL-P...dp/B004INVKP4/

What I'm surprised nobody seems to have made is something that combines a Magic Eye transmitter with the mains wiring network. For instance, theoretically I could have two computers plugged into such a mains network and do exactly what I want. One computer could receive the signal, transmit a message over the mains to the other computer which would then output that same signal using a USB IR blaster. But that would be overkill.

At this stage I'm fairly certain no-one has made one yet.

edit: in retrospect I'm thinking that most of the poor performance with the AV senders is down to sending the picture, which I don't need to do. From what I've read the IR part is the bit that usually works okay. Hmm. Going to try a cheap IR extender and see how it works. Easier than re-inventing the wheel, right?
If it's a sky box all you need is a a magic eye.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Global-TV-...item3f031a4a35

You need to check that 9V power is enabled on the Sky box.

The system is designed to send back remote control signals over the coax used to send the pictures, it's used in millions of installations.

A over the mains Video/Audio link with remote control would be a usefull gadget but one purely for remote control where a wired link already exists would be totally pointless.
grahamlthompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 12:42   #7
Chris Simon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Snowdonia
Services: Panasonic Freesat TV; Humax Foxsat HDR Freesat+; Pioneer DVR630H-S;
Posts: 2,694
As others have already mentioned, there are already adaptors that are able to send IR back down the video cable, whether it's coax or HDMI. I have one of those HDMI adaptors and it works a treat.

As they have already pointed out too, if there exists a wired coax or HDMI cable to the second TV, it's pointless sending the IR back via a network if it can be done via the video cable.

Where network IR would be useful is where there is no wired cable back to the device you are controlling, or if there is a cable where no-one has yet created an IR adaptor for it (e.g. a hi-fi, or speakers?)

However, fear not there is a solution, albeit pricey! The KIRA system from Keene. An IR receiver at one end that transmits to an emitter at the other end over the network. If you haven't got suitable network points nearby then you can always plug these units into a standard Homeplug mains system.

It's not exactly what you were after, it requires a network, but it would certainly allow you to transmit IR over mains wiring.
Chris Simon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 13:27   #8
Winston_1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by dadioflex View Post

I have personal experience of using homeplug network extenders to network computers without running cat5 cabling. You plug in 2 or more units and "pair" them all and it creates a virtual computer network using your existing mains wiring.

Like this:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/TP-Link-TL-P...dp/B004INVKP4/
The mains wiring is not designed to be used like this. These network extenders (homeplugs) are electronic filth which create interference to other users of the radio spectrum. We certainly don't want any more such devices.l
Winston_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 14:01   #9
platelet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cult, Sci-Fi & Fantasy forum
Posts: 4,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by dadioflex View Post
It's for my mum's new house. It's set up so she can watch what's on the Sky box in the front room in her bedroom, but she can't change channels. there's no problem with the video signal, just the remote control.
So I'd assume from that they have wired in an RF feed from the sky box and you have tried a magic eye connected on the end of that - and that doesn't work?

If so:
  • As Graham suggested check that the power supply is turned on on the sky box (and the RF feed is coming off the right socket)
  • Check the magic eye works if connected directly to the sky box - it could be a fault with the eye it self
  • check the TV set in the bedroom is not interfering with the magic eye. This is common with LCD sets. If you fit a one meter patch lead (old VCR leads are good for this) between the ariel socket of that set and the magic eye that may cure the problem. I've seen recommendations that say this may need to be up to three meters in length.
  • try changing channels without the TV connected at all, if this works then you may need a decoupler
  • after that I'd start to support wall plates or loft connections of blocking the return and then it depends on how much effort you want to put in to tracing the issue
platelet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 15:16   #10
Deacon1972
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Services: Optoma HD65 (3D) - Denon4520 - Genelecs- SVS 16- 46 - 2x SkyHD 1TB - PS3
Posts: 5,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by dadioflex View Post
It's for my mum's new house. It's set up so she can watch what's on the Sky box in the front room in her bedroom, but she can't change channels. there's no problem with the video signal, just the remote control. We've been told the GHz IR transmitters are a waste of time, and my own experiences would bear this out.
Have you looked at the Powermid?

I have one to control the TV in the conservatory, the stb is in the front room which is separated by 3 internal walls and spans 20+m, works a treat, I believe it uses 5.4ghz frequencies so doesn't affect WiFi etc.

http://www.keene.co.uk/electronics/w...FWJItAodVly98w
Deacon1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2012, 02:04   #11
Richard_Wright
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 40
I thought about it for awhile before deciding to comment here but what you guys are talking about is complex and might not be available on current TVs. But there are convenient remote controllers, for example, the ones with voice recognition systems. I heard Samsung and LG TVs have these features. Samsung voice recognition is built inside the TV itself and LG voice recognition is set inside its remote controller, magic controller. It may feel uncomfortable to speak to TV, especially when you are watching it at the same time J, but you can give voice searches on LG TVs just by saying it on remote.
Richard_Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2012, 22:11   #12
oilman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 179
This is a great solution to remote changing of channels. You have an ir receiver near sky box . The transmitter fits in as a special battery in sky remote. Signal fromeå remote to receiver is rf and works through walls.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/SV1100-One...item27c935aa5b
oilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:02.