Getting rid of data gatherers |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,457
|
Getting rid of data gatherers
Toshiba Laptop
Windows 7 x64 I'm constantly having my computiing slowed down by some routines running briefly at 100% CPU power. Flickering at the bottom of my screen I see references to websites beginning with things like "adclick...", "geocheck..." or "mookie..." I run Malwarebytes and CCleaner every day, check the cookies I want to keep in the latter, and I have my browser (IE8) set to not accept third party cookies. Everything's fine for a few hours, and then they're back again. Is there anything I can do about them? I've seen references in here to Mac software, but what about PC? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: colchester
Services: freeview fvrt200, broadband 4Mb, 2Kw solar pv array
Posts: 7,493
|
I run ff with noscript and ghostery which seems to stop this sort of thing. Plus paid for malwarebytes which runs in real-time.
Total contrast to work where the opposite happens, the things you mention often can be seen at the bottom of the window. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,457
|
I had a look at the software you mentioned. Noscript seems to be only for firefox, while ghostery runs on some versions of Windows, but not 7 (according to a review in PC World). I've also seen comments that it identifies trackers, but doesn't block them.
I've no objection to either adverts or trackers, until they stop me loading a web page because they're sitting waiting for a reply from their server. Which I'm sure is against the Computer Misuse Act 1991. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Services: Old Boilers
Posts: 3,126
|
but as most ad server companies will be based abroad they are not bound by uk law
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,804
|
Quote:
windows 7 x64 - firefox seems to be blocking stuff for me, there is a set up process, my recollection was that it wasn't just install and go to block stuff, but it was a while back that i installed it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: colchester
Services: freeview fvrt200, broadband 4Mb, 2Kw solar pv array
Posts: 7,493
|
Quote:
You can see the sucess (or not) with https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/fir...don/collusion/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,569
|
If all that is happening is a bit of a slow down, it very probably is not a virus. You might have an add on, have a look and try disabling things. You could also see what happens with another browser. Opera might be best because not so many people use it.
Incidentally, IE9, though slightly slower and clunkier than earlier versions, is easier to 'work' for this sort of thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,457
|
Sorry to take so long to get back, but I've been doing some googling when I've had the chance.
It seems that IE does have problems when running ghostery, mainly in the effect of having more than two tabs open at once. The firm is planning to rewrite it completely, and have, for a few months, been promising a new version by the end of the summer. This was from their own ghostery forum, but I'm afraid I didn't keep a link. I may take the advice on trying a new browser; now I'll have to do a bit more research on the 'best' one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sandy Heath, Beds, UK
Posts: 5,067
|
Privoxy works fine with IE9 and blocks most ads and third party content.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,457
|
I had a look at Privoxy, and it just seems way too complex for what I want it to do; I couldn't understand the FAQ answers.
![]() I came across mention of InPrivate Filtering, which seems to do exactly what I want - block the tracking software. But does it run only within InPrivate Browsing? That would make life difficult, because there'd be no continuity (if that's the right word) of cookies. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 1,370
|
Audience Science
Criteo Google Analytics Rubicon - all blocked on this page. Windows 7 (64bit) with Chrome and Ghostery. 30 seconds to download and complete a simple setup wizard - turn the blocking option on for all sites and the bubble option off unless you want to be told every time something gets blocked. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sandy Heath, Beds, UK
Posts: 5,067
|
Quote:
You only need the complex stuff to tweak the configuration yourself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Slough, UK
Posts: 306
|
Adblock plus used in Firefox stops all these ads and adds a block tab to the ones that get through so you can choose whether to block it or not, I use AOL email in firefox and now don't get any of AOL's ads at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Services: steam
Posts: 23,579
|
Quote:
I know I should have the latest flashplayer, but my last few experiences have been that if you update it, before things you do need - like youtube - actually demand an update, the update is often ahead of and incompatible with the software doing other things - and things like realplayer stop working for that reason too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,457
|
I've decided to go for FireFox and, after a few days getting used to it, add AdBlockPlus.
I'm now getting problems of a webpage not loading, and the line at the bootim of the screen showing an adserver address. Googling tells me that this happens when an adserver is down ...your webpage just hangs. As I said earlier, I've nothing against ads, or even data trackers, until they start interfering with my browsing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 464
|
Quote:
It blocks them if you choose to block them (options > block all) NoScript is the most powerful tool out there but it's a PITA to get set up correctly and as you say it's FireFox only. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Services: A hoover or some other generic vacuum cleaning machine.
Posts: 27,855
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,457
|
I was only going by what was said on the Ghostery users' forum, plus the reply from the company, which promised a completely new version by the end of the summer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Services: Citizen Smith TV
Posts: 20,120
|
Considering that it is how a web site is funded, if can be probably be considered part of the main site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,457
|
Quote:
The waiting to download, and waiting for the upload, are actions which I haven't authorised. Which, if I remember correctly, are the key words in the Act. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Services: A hoover or some other generic vacuum cleaning machine.
Posts: 27,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,457
|
Quote:
And sorry, it was 1990, not 1991. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Services: A hoover or some other generic vacuum cleaning machine.
Posts: 27,855
|
Quote:
Its like you are saying page redirects are illegal aswell, but they are just the contents returned from a PHP request. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,457
|
Quote:
If page redirects are what I think they are, then they could be considered to be authorised by the request for the original webpage. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:08.




