[Sunshine&Solace]

Originally Posted by Dennis C

You're talking a lot of Tommy Rollocks, you know that, don't you?

KS was not a single woman so don't try and compare her to one. She was in what the law calls a common law relationship, living together with her partner. If RP had died she'd have had as much call on his estate as a wife would. Eg first dibs.

A single woman - that you seem to be suggesting that KS was/is - lives on her own and has no partner. Don't tell me or anyone else that KS was such a person.

Married man cheating on wife is a scumbag of the highest order. Woman in common law relationship cheating on the partner she lives with is also a scumbag of the highest order. Both are equal scumbags.

I really wish people wouldn't perpetuate this myth. There is no such claim in law, being a common law wife/husband means you get zip if you break up or die (unless the common law partner dies and wills everything to you). So many women get caught out this way when they have children and the husband leaves them or dies intestate.

[Dancing Girl]

Am I going mad or did I read in the newspaper the other day that Kristen is now saying her "affair" was NOT sexual? What on earth is going on. Could this possibly be a publicity stunt! This guy was making his first movie as a director and he has an affair with his leading lady! Is he barking mad!!!!! I read that he will not direct the sequal but the whole "affair" sounds off to me. How could Kirsten Steward keep her relationship with Robert so quiet for so many years and yet have an affair that lasted a few months, plasted all over the newspapers??

[Dancing Girl]

Originally Posted by Takae

Yet no one seems to give the sod that a married man has broken his marriage vows. He's a MARRIED man. If she did go after him, then he should have refused point blank. Should have kept her at bay.

He went for it, anyway. It's not like she held a gun to his head to force him to have an affair with her. Also? He's old enough to know better. He had twenty years' worth of life experiences under his belt.

But people are acting as if a 22-year-old woman should have the control because this 41-year-old man is sooooooo incapable of remembering his moral obligation to his wife and children, and saying no.

Like it or not, a single person owes no one. It's a different story for a married person. A married person owes it to his or her spouse not to break their marriage vows. So it's always down to them to refuse an offer, no matter how tempting. Always.

So why is KS getting blasted while people are ignoring the married man? It's not the first time, either. I see this happening over and over and over. The other woman is always a "homewrecker" while the married man gets away with it. Every single time. This is not right. Yes, it's wrong for anyone to have an affair with a married person, but it's even more wrong to go after the "homewrecker" when it's the unfaithful spouse that we should be after with pitchforks.

An unfaithful spouse is the homewrecker. Full stop.

Kristen hardly walked into this situation with her eyes closed. She worked with this guys wife, knew his kids and still had no hesitation to have an affair with him. Sorry, I would have more sympathy if she had been single and did not know this guy was married. It sounds to me as though she is more intersted in furthering her career than her so-called "love" for Robert. Quite honestly I think both of them are responsible for their behaviour. There is something awfully disgusting about a man going off with a woman who is friendly with his wife. He sounds a real creep, very self involved. Perhaps they deserve each other.

[rbautz]

Kristen Stewart has landed the lead role of Lie down in Darkness.

[ultimatums]

Originally Posted by Dancing Girl

Am I going mad or did I read in the newspaper the other day that Kristen is now saying her "affair" was NOT sexual? What on earth is going on. Could this possibly be a publicity stunt! This guy was making his first movie as a director and he has an affair with his leading lady! Is he barking mad!!!!! I read that he will not direct the sequal but the whole "affair" sounds off to me. How could Kirsten Steward keep her relationship with Robert so quiet for so many years and yet have an affair that lasted a few months, plasted all over the newspapers??

Its not quite Bill Clinton's "no sexual relations" but she's saying they haven't had intercourse. Foreplay but no intercourse.

No one really believed Clinton and no one is really believing Kristen or Rupert on this or them saying it was only a one time thing.

[zx50]

Originally Posted by ultimatums

Its not quite Bill Clinton's "no sexual relations" but she's saying they haven't had intercourse. Foreplay but no intercourse.

No one really believed Clinton and no one is really believing Kristen or Rupert on this or them saying it was only a one time thing.

If it was a one time thing, they'd surely have got a room for a 'quickie'. This definitely looks like it was a regular with them.

[babouchka35]

I’m not a fan ! You’ll probably never see this lines, but your stories touched me because I recognize me in your two cases and in my case, with the same man !

First in the case of Robert Pattinson : I met my husband when I was 19 years old and he became my best friend. I fell in love with him. We start to be a couple when I was 21 years old and my husband 24 years old. We were a fusional couple and we decided that if something happen at one of us, the other prefer to know the truth. After 1 year of common life, I was 22 years old, my « man » announced me that he had kissed another woman ! It was horrible : the worst thing which could happened to me… I asked me : « when you really love someone, how could you make that ? » . It was inconceivable for me… But I really loved him, and I decided to forgive him. 2 years after, we got married.

Second in the case of Kristen Stewart : 2 years after our wedding, I met a man in my job and we became friends : my husband, this man and me. And finally, in time, I desired this man. My question was : « How it is possible : I really love my husband and I can’t imagine to live without him, but I desire an other man ! ». It was a difficult part of my life, during 2-3 years I desired 2 mans. I think that this man also desired me, but we ever made nothing. But I know that if he had made the first step, I would have cheated my husband. I told it to my husband few month after this feeling appeared. So he knew it during the 2-3 years, and he knew that I could cheated him. The desire for this man disappeared some month after he left.

It’s at this moment I left my illusions : the life is hard and you can’t be sure of nothing. You could have feeling for 2 persons. But I think that if a couple really love each other, you must speak with the other one and hear what the other one has to say. And, it's only after having discussed and said things, that we can make our decision.

Actually I have 33 years old, with my husband we have 2 wonderful childs. Some times it’s difficult for each other because we know that although we love very much everything can tip over. But we love and desire each other so much!

[granted08]

Originally Posted by rbautz

Kristen Stewart has landed the lead role of Lie down in Darkness.

This proves that the scandal isn't going to ruin Kristen's career.

[Eddie Badger]

Will Ferrell's obviously upset by these events http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/...son-video.html

[PrincessPerfect]

Originally Posted by granted08

This proves that the scandal isn't going to ruin Kristen's career.

It mean's that, at the very least the team behind Lie Down In the Darkness think she still's of value regarding the Box Office - it's not actually a test of whether her fanbase - primarly of young teenage girls are still supporting her. The test of that, will be when Lie Down In The Darkness - and indeed other of flims away from the Twilight Franchise that Stewart does are released.

Breaking Dawn Part 2, doing is well is given not least because teenage girls will go see it purely for Pattinson. As for whether Stewart and Pattinson will go the distance - that's something else. Recent reports suggest, although he's finally made some form of contact with her, he still isn't forgiving her, and she's been banned from the premiere of Compolis, by the team behind it and Pattinson himself - apparently he just 'doesn't want to see her'.

As for the affair itself in terms of the wider debate on this thread, Stewart is as much to blame as Sanders. Her being young isn't an excuse; Stewart is of the age where she can understand a moral code, and furthermore immaturity isn't an excuse either. Yes, the level of maturity can be associated with age - but they aren't mutually exclusive - there are many mature young people out there, as there immature older people. The fact was Stewart was in a relationship; she may not have been married, or had children but she still had a duty of being faithful to Pattinson - and furthermore, if it was Sanders (like other reports suggest) who was doing the chasing, Stewart should have made the concious decision - as a woman in a relationship, and well aware of Sanders relationship status, to reject his advances. Sanders is bad, obviously because he cheated on his wife, and his children. Both of them conciously knew their actions would hurt those who loved them (how couldn't they?) and still put their own short-term desires above their respective partners. That alone makes them equally guilty.

[Geneve]

It shocks me we have 16 pages of this thread and I can fill up most of it with people who are trying to justify...

The saying Don't Sh*t on your own doorstep comes to mind! They both knew paps would be following them around well K did for sure. They weren't caught in a seedy motel room they were caught in the light of day!

They both make me sick for different reasons 2 classless people.

[Cottontail]

Am I the only person to think that both the people in these photos look like they know the photographer is there? In at least two photos one or the other of them is looking at the camera. All seems to be very odd to me. Apologies if this has already been addressed but it really does look staged to me. I just can't work out why either of them would feel the need to do this?

[rbautz]

Originally Posted by Cottontail

Am I the only person to think that both the people in these photos look like they know the photographer is there? In at least two photos one or the other of them is looking at the camera. All seems to be very odd to me. Apologies if this has already been addressed but it really does look staged to me. I just can't work out why either of them would feel the need to do this?

Not necessarily. They sure both of them are aware of movings by people or cars in a distance of 80 meters. But the paps in L.A have a immense photo equipment, they took the photos maybe from a distance of 2-300 meter out of a car.

[Dakota.]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...ons-heart.html

Sorry for the DM link, but it seems like such a set up with those pictures. They both look straight at the camera, how could they not see the paps?

[rbautz]

Originally Posted by Dakota.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...ons-heart.html

Sorry for the DM link, but it seems like such a set up with those pictures. They both look straight at the camera, how could they not see the paps?

If you look at a Black SUV in a distance of 300 meters, Would you see a camera lens?

[johartuk]

Zoom lenses. A pap with a good zoom lens could be standing half a mile away.

[granted08]

Originally Posted by PrincessPerfect

It mean's that, at the very least the team behind Lie Down In the Darkness think she still's of value regarding the Box Office - it's not actually a test of whether her fanbase - primarly of young teenage girls are still supporting her. The test of that, will be when Lie Down In The Darkness - and indeed other of flims away from the Twilight Franchise that Stewart does are released.

Breaking Dawn Part 2, doing is well is given not least because teenage girls will go see it purely for Pattinson. As for whether Stewart and Pattinson will go the distance - that's something else. Recent reports suggest, although he's finally made some form of contact with her, he still isn't forgiving her, and she's been banned from the premiere of Compolis, by the team behind it and Pattinson himself - apparently he just 'doesn't want to see her'.

As for the affair itself in terms of the wider debate on this thread, Stewart is as much to blame as Sanders. Her being young isn't an excuse; Stewart is of the age where she can understand a moral code, and furthermore immaturity isn't an excuse either. Yes, the level of maturity can be associated with age - but they aren't mutually exclusive - there are many mature young people out there, as there immature older people. The fact was Stewart was in a relationship; she may not have been married, or had children but she still had a duty of being faithful to Pattinson - and furthermore, if it was Sanders (like other reports suggest) who was doing the chasing, Stewart should have made the concious decision - as a woman in a relationship, and well aware of Sanders relationship status, to reject his advances. Sanders is bad, obviously because he cheated on his wife, and his children. Both of them conciously knew their actions would hurt those who loved them (how couldn't they?) and still put their own short-term desires above their respective partners. That alone makes them equally guilty.

Agreed, but if the banning story isn't true, I can't see Kristen turning up begging to talk to him, she's probably been texting/ apologising since the story broke.

[ultimatums]

He probably just said that he doesn't want her near him and if she comes to the premiere he won't show up. And now its moved to he's banned her from it. His close friends or the movie PR team is trying to generate more news and protect RP.

I am sure that Kristen won't turn up at the premiere but making it known that RP has "banned her" is just embarrassing her and making her look desperate.

[SCDchick]

Originally Posted by ultimatums

I think the wife, Liberty Ross, has had suspicions about Kristen and Rupert and likely hired a PI to trail her husband and was able to get the pictures.

I hope she kicks her scrawny ass!!!!!

[SCDchick]

Originally Posted by Geneve

They both make me sick for different reasons 2 classless people.

So she`s been sucking the directors dick all this time, no class at all. I feel sorry for R Patz actually as didnt he want to marry her?

I wonder if he will get her a pay rise for favours though

[Dennis C]

Originally Posted by SCDchick

So she`s been sucking the directors dick all this time, no class at all.

Can't let this thread fall off the first page. Especially when we get such coarse but accurate observations such as yours that not only reflect the circumstances as we know them but are wonderfully funny to read.

Must be grateful to KS though, at a time when the Olympics and TeamGB are showing us the best of humanity, along comes KS and reminds us of the worst!

[Semierotic]

The stories about Kristen Stewart are getting hyserical. It's open season for the rags because neither of parties are talking so won't confirm or deny anything.

[wilehelmas]

Originally Posted by Semierotic

The stories about Kristen Stewart are getting hyserical. It's open season for the rags because neither of parties are talking so won't confirm or deny anything.

Agreed. I was going to post the same myself.

I think it's a tactic to try and draw the parties out into the open and say something/refute things the press are printing, because neither are giving the press the scoop they truly want by being silent.

[FingersAndToes]

It looks like at least for now Liberty Ross has dumped the cheating scum "husband".

http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-...stewart-201278

I do feel sorry for her, though. She doesn't seem the type to want the spotlight or media attention from the paparazzi, but she has been somewhat forced into it until this story calms down.

[Semierotic]

Originally Posted by Dennis C

Must be grateful to KS though, at a time when the Olympics and TeamGB are showing us the best of humanity, along comes KS and reminds us of the worst!

If you think KS represents the 'worst' of humanity you haven't read much history.

Anyway, this won't effect her career because all she seems to be choosing are non Twlighty films that don't need that kind of fanbase. I'm not exactly a fan of her acting but she's made some intriguing choices that suggest she has no interesting whatsoever in maintaining her teen idol status.