LLU, non LLU - What's the difference? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,421
|
LLU, non LLU - What's the difference?
What if anything is the difference between LLU and non LLU broadband?
Stability? Speed? Nothing? I'm just curious. Would I get a better service/connection from BT directly, than from, for example Sky or Talktalk? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Yorkshire
Services: TalkTalk
Posts: 1,488
|
Non-LLU means that a provider rents a connection from BT Wholesale and then sub-lets it to you.
LLU is where a provider takes over the running of the line from BT, this usually involves connecting your line to the provider's own equipment in the telephone exchange. BT are still responsible for the line between your house and the exchange. A few years ago the only way to get speeds over 8mb was to go LLU. Now that BT have upgraded, the only major difference between the two is price. LLU is almost always cheaper. As for who is better? They are no better or worse than each other in terms of service quality, but you'll generally find that non-LLU services have more download restrictions than LLU services. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Services: Freeview, Freesat, Eclipse Business Gold, Blinkbox, Netflix UK
Posts: 15,023
|
Also depends on the backhaul from the exchange - some wholesale LLU providers (such as Tiscali/Talktalk) had a tendency to oversubscribe their backhaul (comms from the exchange to the ISP's core networks), and I personally remember when my connection was LLU'd at one point (Eclipse were using LLU connections until BT proved to be a better wholesale provider and had rolled out ADSL2). A mistake was made when Tiscali accidentally put traffic management on their wholesale lines, choking me to sub-ISDN speeds. I tracked down who was providing my line and complained to both them AND Eclipse... was NOT impressed as my sync speed was the full 8Mbps afforded at the time, and had in no way hammered my connection.
Was around the time that Tiscali was collapsing. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hampshire, England
Services: BT Broadband, BT Vision, BT Broadband Talk, Freesat
Posts: 7,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: S6 WTID UTO FTB
Posts: 5,128
|
Depends if you are on an exchange thats recived the 21cn upgrades and now provides ADSL2+ as standard, if you are then there will be little difference in the actual performance. On price however for an ADSL based package Sky cant be beat i dont think, i was certainly happy when i was with them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,947
|
I get twice the speed for half the price with Talk Talk when compared to BT. My connection speed is typically around 14 and I have never had an isuue, Mind you I never had an issue with BT either other than the price as my bill for Option 3 and phone calls was about £41 per month.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Services: Virgin TV V+HD XLSkySportsMovies, VHDBox, BT Phone, O2 BB & Orange iPhone 5
Posts: 10,174
|
I dont know why bt are not being more competitive the prices are extortionate I want to have their services but simply cannot afford to have them so go with other providers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Merseyside
Services: Virgin Trio Services, Nokia C7 - Three Mobile.
Posts: 1,066
|
In my opinion. BT go by reputation only. They are expensive and rearly offer decent deals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 360
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Posts: 2,387
|
With BT and non- LLU there is also sometimes a problem with exchange congestion. And they won't always admit to it either telling you that it's all great. I eventually found out that the exchange where I used to live was congested only by emailing the MD of BT who admitted it. So I moved to BE and LLU.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:13.




