PC to 9200T via USB |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Services: BBC TV licence
Posts: 572
|
PC to 9200T via USB
I understand the 9200T has a USB socket which John Lewis say is for transferring digital photos and MP3s, but can it also be used to copy recordings to a PC where they could be edited and burnt to DVD? Would these discs play back in broadcast quality? How simple is it?
Also, I was ready to buy a Panasonic TUCH100 a few weeks ago but was put off at the last minute after reading about all the bugs. If the next update fixed the major flaws of the Panasonic, would it be a better machine than the 9200T? I know the Humax has double the storage but I'm not sure about other features or picture quality etc. The Panasonic still costs more, despite being a few months older, not having a USB port and having long standing bugs. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 275
|
Quote:
http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/...d.php?t=293178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Services: BBC TV licence
Posts: 572
|
Ah, thanks for that. It seems it's pretty simple, though it does reply on Humax's own software.
The USB port alone is probably enough to put me off the Panasonic for good now unless anyone knows of a very good reason to pay the extra for it? (surely they're charging more for a much lower-spec'd machine?) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finchingfield, Essex
Services: Fusion100+Fusion200 PVRs, Streamium SL300i, Panasonic E55, Plusnet 8Mb ADSL
Posts: 5,511
|
Quote:
The only real competition to 9200 is the Topfield and after that perhaps the Fusion 200 and at a pinch (if it were cheaper!) the Inverto Cliff PS I am a massive Panasonic fan and love my E55 DVDR but they REALLY screwed up big time with the TUTCH100 ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London
Services: BBC TV licence
Posts: 572
|
Quote:
Do Humax have a good track record in offering updates to fix bugs and add new features to old models? As an aside, because I don't know much about the technical side of widescreen TV, I see the manual says that the default screen ratio is 14:9 but aren't freeview channels 16:9? And it says it can record in 720x480 or 720x576 but isn't non-HDTV widescreen 852x480? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finchingfield, Essex
Services: Fusion100+Fusion200 PVRs, Streamium SL300i, Panasonic E55, Plusnet 8Mb ADSL
Posts: 5,511
|
Quote:
Don't worry about the aspect thing - the key thing is the 9200 can display all the current pixel ratios used by the Freeview broadcasters - including the "odd ones" that ITV2/E4 use. Cliff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portsmouth
Services: VM XL (20Mb), Humax 9200T, Xbox 360, Panasonic TX-P42G15
Posts: 500
|
Quote:
From the release notes for the software update: Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 146
|
Quote:
Most Freeview (digital) is either true widescreen 16:9 or is true 4:3. It is sent with a 'flag' that identifies the aspect mode so that the TV can switch automatically (if so enabled). You will see for instance that currently most ad breaks on ITV are set to 4:3 even within a 16:9 programme! In terms of numbers, 720x576 is the current 'PAL' MPEG signal, 720x480 is the size for 'NTSC'. Even 4:3 is thus slightly anamorphic (horizontals squashed) although for the Yanks it is the other way around (slightly stretched). To make matters more interesting, the actual 'active' area is only about 702 pixels in PAL and about 712 in NTSC, but that is another rather complicated story! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:18.


