Digital Spy

Search Digital Spy
 

DS Forums

 
 

A Question to DS re Savile ...


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-01-2013, 12:15
Newkidontheblok
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,689

For YEARS people have attempted to start threads re Savile and his proclivities - they have all gone the same way - wooshed by Mods . Would DS like to explain why and on whose authority people were silenced????
Newkidontheblok is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 11-01-2013, 12:38
DiamondDoll
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 8,277
Haven't you noticed the long-running JS thread?
DiamondDoll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 12:43
whatever54
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,087
I would imagine the ones 'wooshed by mods' may have been before he died? Not sure but just my guess
whatever54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 12:46
j4Rose
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,843
It was probably for legal reasons.
j4Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 12:49
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
For YEARS people have attempted to start threads re Savile and his proclivities - they have all gone the same way - wooshed by Mods . Would DS like to explain why and on whose authority people were silenced????
Because when he was alive he could of sued them for slander. This is a pointless thread
Betty Britain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 12:52
Honestweegie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,415
You cant accuse somebody unless you have proof.... now we have proof
Honestweegie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 13:04
Cryolemon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Newark, Notts, UK
Posts: 5,908
Because when he was alive he could of sued them for slander. This is a pointless thread
Libel, but yes.
Cryolemon is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 13:55
Newkidontheblok
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,689
[quote=Betty Britain;63500448]Because when he was alive he could of sued them for slander. This is a pointless thread[/QUOTE

My point is that it WAS true (as is now proved) . Why were so many quick to protect him ?? It's a pity that no one had the balls to allow him to try and sue when he was alive - all that has come out now may have come out then and justice could have been served .
Newkidontheblok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 14:17
soundstory
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,114
[quote=Newkidontheblok;63501428]
Because when he was alive he could of sued them for slander. This is a pointless thread[/QUOTE

My point is that it WAS true (as is now proved) . Why were so many quick to protect him ?? It's a pity that no one had the balls to allow him to try and sue when he was alive - all that has come out now may have come out then and justice could have been served .
There isn't a big conspiracy at work.

As stated by other users, this really is a pointless thread
soundstory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 14:23
lotty27
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wine cellar
Posts: 16,305
They weren't protecting him - they were protecting themselves from huge lawsuits! You can't libel the dead but you can certainly libel the living. JS was still alive and as this is an anonymous forum so where was the proof? JS couldn't sue every poster (without a load of hassle anyway) but he could have certainly sued DS. If JS had got nasty the whole of DS could have been shut down (worse case scenario of course but it could still have cost them a lot of money.) DS were (are) responsible for what is written on their forum, therefore anything considered libellous got closed down.


Now he's dead they can leave the threads/posts there for all to see.
lotty27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 14:27
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
Thank you I wasn't sure which one it was
Betty Britain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 19:19
Tal'shiar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,532
Same reason other names have to be under control. The public has a tendency to run away with things like these and it can be wrong (it often is). Without going into details, recently names have popped up, and websites already have started locking down elements in order to avoid any legal cases.
Tal'shiar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 19:24
Fizgig
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,974
They weren't protecting him - they were protecting themselves from huge lawsuits! You can't libel the dead but you can certainly libel the living. JS was still alive and as this is an anonymous forum so where was the proof? JS couldn't sue every poster (without a load of hassle anyway) but he could have certainly sued DS. If JS had got nasty the whole of DS could have been shut down (worse case scenario of course but it could still have cost them a lot of money.) DS were (are) responsible for what is written on their forum, therefore anything considered libellous got closed down.


Now he's dead they can leave the threads/posts there for all to see.
If what you're saying is true, then they can't sue you (successfully) for libel. Apparantly, people did have proof, so they could have taken him down when he was alive.
Fizgig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 20:53
Galaxy266
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,990
Is it just myself who cannot see the "Comments" on the following story on the DS Homepage?

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/...-recorded.html

According to the feature there are 26 comments, but where are they? I can't see them. I can see the comments on the other features, but not for this one

Not another example of DS censorship, I hope!
Galaxy266 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 12:27
dorydaryl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: HELP! I'm dazzled!
Posts: 10,473
The sad thing is that people like JS get away with what they do because others let them. He was pathologically geared towards doing exactly what he wanted without thought or conscience for anyone else. He was manipulative, completely driven by his personal whims and believed that the world was there to revolve around him. Most people aren't like that and don't think/ behave that way because they're not so intrinsically warped. I think that most (not all) people who get into positions of high power (in business and politics, for example) do so because they have a ruthless and self-serving streak which enables them to put the needs of others secondary to their own aims and goals. He was one of the worst examples because he had the 'chari-dee' twist and used it to his advantage. He would ingratiate himself with certain high profile people and very likely called in favours when he got under their skins.

Sadly, I don't blame DS for closing the pre-death Savile threads. It's just a shame that not enough people and organizations were brave enough to 'join the dots' and bring him to justice before he died. Even so, that wouldn't have been the 'job' of DS because it's not that kind of website. The best the mods could have done is passed some of the forum comments on to the authorities for closer investigation....but that could have but specific FMs at risk of prosecution for reasons we already know. Lots of the comments were speculative, anecdotal and non-specific, making such an investigation a bit pointless even though they were later shown to be accurate.

My uncle is convinced that JS was complicit in his own death because he knew the net was closing. Getting older and frailer, he no longer had the clout that he once flouted. All we can do is make sure that nobody like him is ever allowed to get away with the same again.
dorydaryl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 12:42
smc81
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 786
You cant accuse somebody unless you have proof.... now we have proof
No we don't. We have hundreds of allegations which can't be challenged because the accused is dead. It is highly likely that Saville was guilty but there is no proof and the only reason that threads like this exist is because the man is dead and can't sue.
smc81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2013, 13:23
alfster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,640
You cant accuse somebody unless you have proof.... now we have proof
We have allegations. We have people alledging that Saville did various things. As Saville is dead and can not be tried in a court of law it will always be alledged. Although from the report it seems that various details given by people do follow similar trends leading towards corroborative details.

The reason the posts and threads are not 'wooshed away' by the mods is that Saville is dead and you can not libel a dead person.

http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/20...ibel-the-dead/
alfster is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:31.