What is the biggest shock in Oscar history? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 19,800
|
Tommy Lee Jones (The Fugitive) winning best supporting actor over Ralph Fiennes (Schindler's List). A big ol' WTF.
Clive Owen (Closer) missing out on best supporting actor to Morgan Freeman (A Million Dollar Baby). I'm a fan of Morgan Freeman, but I thought Clive Owen was superb in Closer. Crash winning best picture. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Services: Oh Hai Mark!
Posts: 12,065
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Services: Stetson's are cool
Posts: 87,879
|
Quote:
Actually, last year i was working on a video project about best picture nominees and i was really surprised to find that The Fugitive had been nominated for Best Picture back in the days when they only shortlisted 5. It's a good solid picture, but Best Picture nominee! Really??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,261
|
Quote:
Agreed! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 94,100
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 1,345
|
Quote:
Nah, I absolutely agree with you. Robert Donat winning Best Actor Oscar for his 1939 role in Goodbye Mr Chips was a massive shocker for that year as the contenders were so strong.. He won over Clark Gable for Gone With The Wind, Laurence Olivier for Wuthering Heights, James Stewart for Mr Smith Goes To Washington and Mickey Rooney for Babes in Arms. Saying that, I love his performance as Mr Chips so am glad he won.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sportyland
Services: Series 1 DS Twists and Sequins Champ now co-host. Reigning champ IBYLGOTDF
Posts: 27,905
|
Julie Christie beating Julie Andrews - Andrews should have won for Sound of Music. Also Christopher Plummer should have had a best actor nomination, with Eleanor Parker for best supporting actress
Cher beating Glenn Close and CZJ getting supporting actress over Queen Latifah - Latifah made a corrupt wardress warm and likeable. Don't think CZJ deserved it |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Services: Stetson's are cool
Posts: 87,879
|
Quote:
I remember seeing an american programme about Clark Gable with a distance relative of him featured ranting about how "no one remembered" the winner of best actor that year and how Gable was "robbed". One can only assume he really wasn't clued up as to who the competition was... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In the bush
Posts: 5,149
|
Crash winning best picture is the one I can remember. Nobody saw that one coming.
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sportyland
Services: Series 1 DS Twists and Sequins Champ now co-host. Reigning champ IBYLGOTDF
Posts: 27,905
|
can anyone offer me any suggestions as to why CZJ got supporting actress over Queen Latifah
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,261
|
Maybe because people knew Queen Latifah could sing but CZJ was a surprise in that regard. And she had to do more dancing. Velma and Mama Morton are equally important parts really. I actually think Queen Latifah was better in Hairspray than in Chicago, but I know I may well be in the minority for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sportyland
Services: Series 1 DS Twists and Sequins Champ now co-host. Reigning champ IBYLGOTDF
Posts: 27,905
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In the bush
Posts: 5,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London
Services: Sky+
Posts: 994
|
The Color Purple being nominated for 11 awards and coming away with nothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: hoping for a lottery win soon
Posts: 8,047
|
Am with those who preferred Queen Latifah in Chicago, I also thought John C Reilly was terrific.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,317
|
Not sure if this was a shock per se, but Bette Davis should have won for All About Eve.
I doubt there will be any shocks this year, unless Anne Hathaway loses which I think she could to Sally Field if Lincoln's strong showing in the nominations is anything to go by. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sportyland
Services: Series 1 DS Twists and Sequins Champ now co-host. Reigning champ IBYLGOTDF
Posts: 27,905
|
Did CZJ being married to Michael Douglas have anything to do with her beating Queen Latifah, who for me gave the better performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rainbow Valley
Services: Sky Digital, Virgin, Tiscali
Posts: 2,640
|
Quote:
To this day I have never seen that film. I firmly believe that it won because the Academy didn't want to give Spielberg the award because he was looked on as an 'enfante terrible' and had to 'earn his dues'. Course, he then won with 'Schindlers List'. Which was a deserved winner, actually. Although I felt that this would get the award as it had all the 'qualities' that the Academy looks for in a film. That it was brilliant as well was just sheer coincidence. Hollywood is incredibly political and the Oscars even more so. It's more of a surprise (not a shock) when something or someone that deserves the Oscar wins! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,261
|
Quote:
I have no idea then, I thought she and Queen Latifah were equally good in Chicago. Latifah would have given a better winners' speech though than the awful one CZJ blamed on her hormones!I sincerely hope that doesn't happen. I'll certainly consider it a shock if Hathaway doesn't win. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,223
|
I loved Queen Latifah in Chicago but I do feel CZJ did deserve that Oscar. She was fantastic.
I just think it's a travesty Julianne Moore hasn't won anything yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,418
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,808
|
She was excellent in All About Eve, but I preferred Gloria Swanson's performance in Sunset Boulevard. Still, I agree that Bette Davis deserved it over Judy Holliday's performance in Born Yesterday. Certainly an eye opener if not a shock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 1,528
|
Bjork's swan dress
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 36,154
|
He picked up an award a couple of years back. Could that be classed as another award for the old guard though?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:21.




Nah, I absolutely agree with you.

I have no idea then, I thought she and Queen Latifah were equally good in Chicago. Latifah would have given a better winners' speech though than the awful one CZJ blamed on her hormones!