Forums
 Register • FAQ • Today's Posts • Search • Rules
 

movie 43

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24-01-2013, 22:32   #1
ellenpagerocks
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,079
movie 43
Any planning on going to see this, i'm going to watch it tomorrow, been no previews for critics so god knows what it will be like but half of hollywood is in it
ellenpagerocks is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 24-01-2013, 22:57   #2
theonlyweeman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,703
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellenpagerocks View Post
Any planning on going to see this, i'm going to watch it tomorrow, been no previews for critics so god knows what it will be like but half of hollywood is in it
If there have been no previews for critics and it has a fairly mainstream distributor (which movie 43 does), it's probably shit...


Here's an over the top sensationalist article from Murdoch's New York Post to prove my point http://www.nypost.com/p/news/nationa...qus9d0e1CRNWZN
theonlyweeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-01-2013, 18:23   #3
degsyhufc
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 35,795
I read up on it and it seems to be a clip movie. Ok, slightly harsh but it is a collection of scenes.

I'm surprised they came out with a trailer for it seeing as it all seems disconnected.



If you want a collection of scenes then watch Amazon Women on the Moon
degsyhufc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2013, 18:18   #4
PunksNotDead
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,916
Its Bad!
PunksNotDead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2013, 18:41   #5
Stephen_Simpson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 328
I'm seeing this tommorow. Even if this is the worst film I've ever seen, I have to see this film. I just need too. I have the feeling this will be the next Room or Plan 9. An opportunity cannot go to waste.
Stephen_Simpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2013, 18:45   #6
Gazinuk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brum
Services: PSN ID: GazimusPrime,
Posts: 1,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen_Simpson View Post
Plan 9.
hey dont knock Plan 9, sure it was bad at the time but theres plenty of films worse than that knocking about now.
Gazinuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2013, 22:26   #7
fizzle90
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
Posts: 4,289
Saw it tonight. Awful, absolutely embarrassing. It really was one of, if not the worst film I have ever seen.
fizzle90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2013, 22:35   #8
Fio Montoya
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,250
Any film with a cast like that, which comes out of absolutely nowhere to the cinema and with no promotion whatsoever save for one ad shown just before, is a must see. I expect it will be spectacularly awful, and for this reason I will watch it. But only when it's out on DVD, not wasting good cinema ticket money on it
Fio Montoya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-01-2013, 22:36   #9
thomasDrooney
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 116
I saw it on Sunday. I hated it, but practically everyone else in the audience seemed to really like it, including my mate (who was laughing his arse off at pretty much all the jokes). If you haven't seen it yet - don't.
thomasDrooney is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2013, 09:46   #10
Inkblot
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: West London
Services: Sky+; ADSL; Apples'n'iPears
Posts: 19,098
Someone has gone to the trouble of describing the whole film in detail on imdb: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1333125/...read/210071779

It sounds like there could be a handful of laughs in the film but going by the other comments on imdb you need to be high to enjoy it. I prefer to have a curry before going to the cinema so it's not going to work for me.
Inkblot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2013, 11:54   #11
GoodLuckCharm
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: London
Posts: 74
Saw it on Saturday - some scenes were funny, others just disgusting!

Looked brilliant from trailers but sadly disappointing!
GoodLuckCharm is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2013, 15:33   #12
James103
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 32
Awful. Embarrassingly awful. none of the stars are doing any press for it....thats how bad!
James103 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2013, 17:24   #13
JasonWatkins
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Services: Sky HD, Phone & BB, Virgin Mobile
Posts: 29,288
Think of the worst film you've ever seen. Start digging underneath that until you get to the 7th layer of hell. Find a chair made of razorblades and spikes and sit down. To make sure you don't move, tie yourself down with barbed wire and then get someone to hammer rusty nails into your eyes.

Then, get them to pour red hot chilli sauce over your genitals.

That experience would be slightly more enjoyable than this film...

However ..

I counted four parts that made me laugh. The first one being the sketch about the children inside the machines. I thought that was really quite clever and did laugh.

The second being at the end of the sketch with Seann William Scott and (a very, very haggard looking) Johnny Knoxville. When they went into the room with the fairy and she said "I suck dick for gold coins", I laughed at that - obviously after seeing the giant cauldron of gold coins in the previous scene

The third being the sketch about the basketball team. Cliched, yes, but actually did wear me down in the end and I did find myself laughing.

The last part was the outtake of the Scott/Knoxville sketch where the fairy said her line and Johnny Knoxville said "So do I"

That was it. The rest of it was just horrible. I nearly walked out during the period sketch. Don't really know why I stayed.
JasonWatkins is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2013, 20:32   #14
natstally
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: West Yorkshire
Services: Sky+HD 1TB Amstrad. Sky Unlimited BB.
Posts: 521
I'm gonna see it tomorrow, I have a Cineworld card so I'm not losing much to see it. I'm getting the feeling I won't like it though...

Anyone know anything about the apparent differences in the US version?
natstally is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2013, 20:43   #15
JasonWatkins
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Services: Sky HD, Phone & BB, Virgin Mobile
Posts: 29,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by natstally View Post
Anyone know anything about the apparent differences in the US version?
Apparently, the US version is Dennis Quaid pitching ideas for films to a studio executive, and as he pitches each idea, we get to see it played out.

The UK version is two stoner kids who try to play a joke on the brother of one of them by telling him about a "banned" movie called "Movie 43", and while he's searching for it online, he finds a number of different films it could be and we see those.

Quite a marked difference I suppose - wonder why they did that?
JasonWatkins is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2013, 20:55   #16
natstally
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: West Yorkshire
Services: Sky+HD 1TB Amstrad. Sky Unlimited BB.
Posts: 521
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonWatkins View Post
Apparently, the US version is Dennis Quaid pitching ideas for films to a studio executive, and as he pitches each idea, we get to see it played out.

The UK version is two stoner kids who try to play a joke on the brother of one of them by telling him about a "banned" movie called "Movie 43", and while he's searching for it online, he finds a number of different films it could be and we see those.

Quite a marked difference I suppose - wonder why they did that?
Hmm, the US one sounds better to me.

Very strange to have a totally different way to frame a movie in different countries. it's bad enough when we get renamed versions and shoddy DVD extras over here!
natstally is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2013, 21:29   #17
cliffy91
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,122
Roger Ebert gave it zero stars
cliffy91 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2013, 21:45   #18
JasonWatkins
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Services: Sky HD, Phone & BB, Virgin Mobile
Posts: 29,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by cliffy91 View Post
Roger Ebert gave it zero stars
That's being generous ..
JasonWatkins is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 30-01-2013, 22:09   #19
Johnny Clay
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,942
Been a while since we've seen a critical thrashing like this - a pathetic 4% on RT.

"The Citizen Kane of awful." - Richard Roeper
Johnny Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2013, 13:27   #20
Virgil Tracy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,475
just saw this .

it's really bad . ..... I mean truly abysmal ! how / why are so many talented people involved in this ? Just .... !!!
Virgil Tracy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2013, 13:55   #21
theonlyweeman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,703
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Clay View Post
Been a while since we've seen a critical thrashing like this - a pathetic 4% on RT.

"The Citizen Kane of awful." - Richard Roeper
Keith Lemon: The Film has an epic 0% http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/keith_lemon_the_film/
theonlyweeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2013, 16:39   #22
ben8936
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellenpagerocks View Post
Any planning on going to see this, i'm going to watch it tomorrow, been no previews for critics so god knows what it will be like but half of hollywood is in it
It Is Supossed To Be One Of The Worst Movies Ever Due To Wikepidia And The Critics
On Rotten Tomatoes Its Rated 4/100
So I Wouldn't Go To It If I Were You
ben8936 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2013, 00:14   #23
koantemplation
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wolf359
Services: "Why do you exist here?"
Posts: 68,129
LOL Hugh Jackman's balls.

And did anyone else find Naomi Watt's seducing her 'son' a turn on?
koantemplation is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:42.

Digital Spy - Privacy Statement - Top