Pay Rises for Judges? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North-West England
Services: Avoid Newport Pagnell on the M1
Posts: 12,331
|
Pay Rises for Judges?
This was in the Mail, so "say no more."
They say, "Dancing with the Stars" may be reduced from two series to one, which would reduce Len and Bruno's pay considerably, as they earn more on that show than on Strictly. It was suggested they were approaching the BBC for a rise. Whether this is true or not, I can't see the BBC giving them any more in these times of big reductions in the pay of many people in TV. I personally don't think they're worth any more money. After so many years, I like I'm certain many, only record this show now and fast-forward through their contributions which have become progressively more about promoting themselves than adding anything of value. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 773
|
Plus, I would've thought that compared to most people's wages, Len and Bruno will earn a small fortune, even without a second series of DWTS. So it's not like they desperately need the money, is it?
I can never understand these celebrities who are already paid so much suddenly deciding it's just not enough for them. Okay then - you come and do my job, and I'll take your 'measly' pay!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 275
|
Quote:
The PROs have taken their popularity and gone on to other projects to make alot more money than they can make on DWTS. As is known by the fans, people tune in alot to see the PRO's but the production staff doesn't seem to get that and the judges keep getting pushed. I suppose it's because they are paid so much and production needs to get their money's worth. Either way, it's not what the public wants because they are losing alot of viewers. Eventually the show will have to go down to 1 season. DWTS production tried showing reruns of previous seasons episodes on the weekends and they couldn't get enough viewers to watch. The show has lost alot of what made it great to watch. The same songs are repeatedly used to much and sung badly. There are very few PRO dances and they now have what they call a dance troupe. All the changes may be contributing to it's downfall and going to 1 season will allow them to try to save the show. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,797
|
I had no idea DWTS had two series per year . You can have too much of a good thing which leads to overkill and being bored . Best to leave us humans wanting more.
They could have like I suggested, a shorter non celeb version which would be interesting, as could SCD. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Buckinghamshire
Posts: 4,277
|
Quote:
![]() Trouble is my friend that they are very busy people and the answer they may give you may be a very political one. To me I don't care if the answer is unsolicited as long as it's an answer.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25.




