[Minnimo]

Originally Posted by noleysgirl

18000 won just now. Pretty exciting stuff!

I was please she won that. She reminded me of someone off tv.

I hate it when a usual suapect lies to come down and help. Almost hope they lose apart from the poor sap that has done all the work.

[Sammy2]

I am quite liking Perfection but I don't know why they ask the 'usual suspects' what they think of the contestant's answers in the first 3 rounds? It doesn't add anything and looks rather stupid when one of them explains why one of the answers is definitely wrong and then Nick still tries to drum up a bit of tension by asking if they have achieved Perfection.

Also, I was wondering if there is a rule against discussing specific questions at the end where the contestant is bargaining with a suspect about coming to help? The conversation always dances around the relevant question, can the contestant not just simply ask 'Which one have I got wrong?'.

[noleysgirl]

Mary was great yesterday!

[noleysgirl]

Is no one else watching this? Prize money building nicely now! Loving Kev's hair!

[SULLA]

I amazes me that people consider going down to help when they are not sure of all six answers

[noleysgirl]

I agree Sulla, victoria was pretty sure though and of course it paid off for her.

[Lilylilac]

How the hell did every one of them not get the bike question?

[IJoinedInMay]

Originally Posted by SULLA

I amazes me that people consider going down to help when they are not sure of all six answers

Originally Posted by noleysgirl

I agree Sulla, victoria was pretty sure though and of course it paid off for her.

I don't understand players (the non-Usual Suspect, if that makes sense?) who offer to take a lower share of the money. 50/50 would be my best offer in all circumstances. I don't agree with giving say, £4000 of the total £7000 to someone who may only help you with one question. I suppose you could argue that without that help, you wouldn't win anything at all but I'd rather go down that route than give one of the Usual Suspects an, IMO, undeserved portion of the prize fund.

[lea_uk]

I love this show.
I don't see the point in the usual suspects saying "We want to change question 1/2/3/4 from true to false." and vice versa. What else are they going to change it to?

[JeffG1]

I hope Louis the teacher doesn't teach anyone I know. He was adamant that Chicago is in Michigan.

[lea_uk]

Originally Posted by JeffG1

I hope Louis the teacher doesn't teach anyone I know. He was adamant that Chicago is in Michigan.

There was a teacher on tonight's In It to Win It, he thought Florida was a city. Scary stuff.

[zoepaulpenny]

Originally Posted by IJoinedInMay

I don't understand players (the non-Usual Suspect, if that makes sense?) who offer to take a lower share of the money. 50/50 would be my best offer in all circumstances. I don't agree with giving say, £4000 of the total £7000 to someone who may only help you with one question. I suppose you could argue that without that help, you wouldn't win anything at all but I'd rather go down that route than give one of the Usual Suspects an, IMO, undeserved portion of the prize fund.

if they want over half of the prize money. they can stay where they are... i would risk it.... let the greedy swines win their own money..

[jackbell]

Repeats begin of season 2 on Easter Monday, for those like me that missed them.

[wcarver]

Would it not make sense if the person who had come down for a share of the winnings had to go back if the contestant decides not to make any changes?
Seems to me the most logical and fairest way of weeding out the toerags who come down without any intention of contributing.

[wcarver]

Yes, these rats always spoil it for me.