Digital Spy

Search Digital Spy
 

DS Forums

 
 

Michael Jackson's "gay lover" says Mark Lester is the "daddy"...


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27-06-2013, 11:21
Betty Britain
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,556
Those questioning Debbie Rowes ability to have the kids and give them to Michael.. Maybe it was because she was a surrogate only.. Maybe she isn't their biological mother.. She could of been the incubator.also as she married Jacko there wouldn't be any adoption needed.by law the kids would be his ..
Betty Britain is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 27-06-2013, 12:12
johartuk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,264
I do not agree that their lives are being screwed up by the media.

Their lives were 100% screwed up by the way they were brought into the world. It was disgusting.

Paying a woman who then gives them up immediately, handing them over to a man (of dubious behavior) who is not their biological father.

I simply dont know how this could have happened legally - can you do this without "adopting"? Can i just come home from work one day with a baby, completely different from me, with zero questions asked by social services?

Yes, the media are intrusive but you could argue that its the family at the moment who are suing for billions, dragging the children into a courtroom where their parentage secret can be ever more exposed.
Prince and Paris would have been easy enough - MJ was married to their mother, so as long as she was happy to let him put his name on their birth certificates as the father, it would have been easy enough to get away with. Blanket is more problematic, since MJ wasn't married to his mother, but perhaps again, she was happy to name him as the father on the birth certificate (and maybe she thought he was, to be fair).

In the Bashir documentary, MJ talked about how, after each of their births, he grabbed newborn Prince and Paris and whisked them out of the hospital (with Debbie's permission) very quickly (one of them still hadn't been washed). It struck me as odd, but it dawned on me just now that he was probably worried that medical staff might start to ask questions, especially if either newborn needed a blood transfusion. No wonder he wanted to get them out of the hospital so quickly!
johartuk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27-06-2013, 14:28
Green_Stamp
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 465
Of course the media want the story, and in this case i cannot blame them. The Jackson family court the media (as do many celebs) , and MJ was perhaps the most famous person on the planet at the time.

When he turns up with a child, clearly of different parentage, it is only natural that the world is interested in that.

The family only seem to be interested in leeching money. Billions. They have already spent enough for a hundred lifetimes and still they are willing to put children through this to gain more. Its disgraceful.

Im not sure the press "go after" suri. It seems that the parents want her to become a fashion icon, with the way they treat and dress her - they hardly hide her from the media. The same could be said of Brooklyn's "fashion career", and Chloe Madely.

I still cannot understand why the social services/ police didnt investigate the MJ children.

This mess is 100% MJs fault, not the media.
You're confused. I didn't mention the media.
Green_Stamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-06-2013, 14:53
galena
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,704
I don't believe Michael would have fancied that dude.
Hmm I goggled him and I tend to agree with you. Is he claiming it happened when he was a kid?
galena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-06-2013, 17:34
len112
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,635
I don't believe Michael would have fancied that dude.
Because that would be weird !
len112 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2013, 11:43
i4u
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,320
I found this interview of Lisa Maria Presley on the Oprah Winfrey show around 2006 (?), talking about Michael Jackson.

It confirms what I've felt about Michael Jackson being very manipulative, convincing individuals they are the only ones he could trust and talk to.

It worked extremely well, look at the number of people who said they were close to Jackson and when there was a fall out it wasn't Michael to blame it was others.

If you read the evidence from various Jacksons in the current trial it's all about emotion rather than fact. They will talk about the spirit of love but pour unrelenting venom on anyone who doesn't play their game.
i4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2013, 12:00
i4u
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,320
....In the Bashir documentary, MJ talked about how, after each of their births, he grabbed newborn Prince and Paris and whisked them out of the hospital (with Debbie's permission) very quickly (one of them still hadn't been washed). It struck me as odd, but it dawned on me just now that he was probably worried that medical staff might start to ask questions, especially if either newborn needed a blood transfusion. No wonder he wanted to get them out of the hospital so quickly!
In the same programme Michael said he craved so much for a child he carried a doll around the house. He also told the world Blanket was born out of a loving relationship with a woman Jackson knew and she was providing him with a gift.

Later in the programme Jackson told the World he had no idea who Blanket's mother was, never met her just ensured she was of good health.

That was Jackson volunteering information himself, it wasn't some 'wacko Jacko' story conjured up by a tabloid.
i4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2013, 17:17
cynet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 784
Only one person to blame for this whole sorry mess and that is Michael Jackson!

No one forced him into taking drugs and nobody forced him to use all different kinds of sperm donors to give him some fantasy of being a single parent.

We all know that Michael was gay and we all know that he had sexual contact with young men.

He was so wrapped up in his own hype that he lost all control of his life where it was left to others to try and do something with him.

AEG didn't put a gun to his head and say 'Hey Michael do the concerts or you're dead meat sunshine'.

Michael was nearly broke before he died because he was reckless and deluded, he had awful mental health problems. With regards to the mental health that wasn't his fault but all the other stuff he did he was guilty as charged.

The kids are now in a situation where they will be hounded for life now because Michael failed to be a decent human being!
cynet is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2013, 18:44
dekaf
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Rose of The Shires
Posts: 4,540
I found this interview of Lisa Maria Presley on the Oprah Winfrey show around 2006 (?), talking about Michael Jackson.

It confirms what I've felt about Michael Jackson being very manipulative, convincing individuals they are the only ones he could trust and talk to.

It worked extremely well, look at the number of people who said they were close to Jackson and when there was a fall out it wasn't Michael to blame it was others.

If you read the evidence from various Jacksons in the current trial it's all about emotion rather than fact. They will talk about the spirit of love but pour unrelenting venom on anyone who doesn't play their game.

Just watched this and agree. I also thought that there is a resemblance between Paris and Lisa Marie. Just saying like!
dekaf is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:19.