Digital Spy

Search Digital Spy
 

DS Forums

 
 

Andy Murray and Kim Sears - Burberry's new mixed doubles team


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14-07-2013, 21:49
FusionFury
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,337

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...bles-team.html

Fair play to them cashing on his Wimbledon success.
FusionFury is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 14-07-2013, 22:14
asyousay
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Posts: 34,015
That won't happen as Andy as a model is a joke. He is simply not good looking enough to be a model .
asyousay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-07-2013, 22:16
Spider Rico
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,152
That won't happen as Andy as a model is a joke. He is simply not good looking enough to be a model .
Being 'good looking' isn't always a pre-requisite.
Spider Rico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-07-2013, 22:24
lexi22
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,426
That won't happen as Andy as a model is a joke. He is simply not good looking enough to be a model .
He's not becoming a model! It's a branding exercise, and Andy & Kim presumably fit whatever this new Burberry campaign is. It's nothing to do with him being a model, it's about what he represents.

Good luck to them, why not.
lexi22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-07-2013, 22:24
Makson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 11,108
I had to laugh at "Andy Murray's chiseled looks" in the article
I'm sorry but if the Mail was reporting a story about Marion Bartoli becoming a model for Burberry instead, they'd be without question referring to her as "full-figured" and "curvaceous", not "pretty" or "attractive" anyway.
The double standards are unreal.
Makson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-07-2013, 22:40
earthling13
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,178
That won't happen as Andy as a model is a joke. He is simply not good looking enough to be a model .
GQ didn't mind putting him on the cover.

http://blog.aglamslam.com/wp-content...634x812-11.jpg
earthling13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-07-2013, 22:43
FusionFury
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6,337
That won't happen as Andy as a model is a joke. He is simply not good looking enough to be a model .
To be fair, nobody will be looking at Andy
FusionFury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 00:22
asyousay
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Posts: 34,015
That photo is so airbrushed it does not even look like Andy . So they did a hell of a lot of editing before they let him grace that front cover .
asyousay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 00:43
Spider Rico
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,152
That photo is so airbrushed it does not even look like Andy . So they did a hell of a lot of editing before they let him grace that front cover .
No more airbrushing than they do with female celebrities......
Spider Rico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 00:49
Bergy87
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 333
That photo is so airbrushed it does not even look like Andy . So they did a hell of a lot of editing before they let him grace that front cover .
Looks more like Joey from EastEnders lol!
Bergy87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 01:27
Shappy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: By the window
Posts: 10,706
That photo is so airbrushed it does not even look like Andy . So they did a hell of a lot of editing before they let him grace that front cover .
Even air brushed he can't manage to look good-looking! He looks like a character from The Simpsons with overbite.
Shappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 07:10
grimtales1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: St. Albans, UK, Team Wagner
Posts: 38,756
That photo is so airbrushed it does not even look like Andy . So they did a hell of a lot of editing before they let him grace that front cover .
I have to agree His face looks like its been chiselled.
grimtales1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 07:32
earthling13
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,178
That photo is so airbrushed it does not even look like Andy . So they did a hell of a lot of editing before they let him grace that front cover .
Gosh! Surely not! Magazine airbrushes pictures? I demand it is closed down immediately!!!!
earthling13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 13:28
vaslav37
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 14,883
Andy is looking sexier than before...

Kim is classed as an English Rose

Best of luck to them...
vaslav37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 13:32
Viridiana
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,432
Even air brushed he can't manage to look good-looking! He looks like a character from The Simpsons with overbite.
Lol i agree. And so much for we are "private" individuals. Just cash in the relationship like the rest.
Viridiana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 14:12
Muggsy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 14,124
That won't happen as Andy as a model is a joke. He is simply not good looking enough to be a model .
Which will be why American Vogue used him way back in 2010.
Muggsy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 14:52
*Sparkle*
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,175
I can't see this happening.

Both seem really keen that they are not a celeb couple, and that Kim does her own thing, so that goes against it. They both seem to like Burberry, and have been seen wearing their stuff, so I wouldn't be surprised if they get sent a lot- of free stuff. This just sounds like one of those stories that get written when a person is big news, so the papers latch onto half-baked ideas that they know they won't get sued for.
*Sparkle* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 14:55
asyousay
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Posts: 34,015
Gosh! Surely not! Magazine airbrushes pictures? I demand it is closed down immediately!!!!
There is airbrushed and then that. It just looks totally fake as its too "airbrushed" - everything natural has been sucked out of the photo.
asyousay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 16:39
Shappy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: By the window
Posts: 10,706
I know Kim is an artist, but is she successful?
Shappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 16:43
Muggsy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 14,124
There is airbrushed and then that. It just looks totally fake as its too "airbrushed" - everything natural has been sucked out of the photo.
It's Vogue. Of course it's not natural.
Muggsy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 16:48
Viridiana
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,432
I know Kim is an artist, but is she successful?
She paints portraits of posh people's pets. I've read that they sell for about 1500. Since she knows a lot of rich people, her family is also not exactly poor,I think she has a nice little earner there. But her main job is clearly being a wag.
Viridiana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 17:20
earthling13
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,178
There is airbrushed and then that. It just looks totally fake as its too "airbrushed" - everything natural has been sucked out of the photo.
Of course that very sucessful model really looks like this:

http://emilydaviesviscom.files.wordp...eg?w=396&h=264

And this is?

http://cdn.stylefrizz.com/img/kate-m...-no-makeup.jpg
earthling13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 17:29
Viridiana
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,432
That's not fair. Kate Moss is Kate Moss, because she absolutely stunning when she was a young girl, absolutely perfect facial structure, not because she was airbrushed to look stunning.
Now they airbrush her because they still want to have her in their campaigns, because she sells, even though she does not look at all like in the old days.
Murray is just ugly, is not that he was once good looking, is simply a case of trying very hard to simply make him good looking. Not working though.
Viridiana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 18:08
attackmusic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,770
I wouldnt call Murray unattractive. He has got better looking and hes got a great body.
Kim is gorgeous
attackmusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2013, 18:10
milliejo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,513
I had to laugh at "Andy Murray's chiseled looks" in the article
I'm sorry but if the Mail was reporting a story about Marion Bartoli becoming a model for Burberry instead, they'd be without question referring to her as "full-figured" and "curvaceous", not "pretty" or "attractive" anyway.
The double standards are unreal.

And unlikely because she is French...
milliejo is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
 
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:46.