Digital Spy

Search Digital Spy
 

DS Forums

 
 
 

Is this Cheryl Cole's extended tattoo?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25-08-2013, 02:38
kakieanne
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 459
She will seriously regret this in 30 years time. I actually think it looks OK at the mo, but when it doesnt or she tires of it there will be NOTHING she can realistically do to majorly change/reduce it. It simply is SO big!

It will look like a messy red splodge on 60+ yr old skin.


I cant help but think people just DONT seriously consider the lifelong consequences of a tattoo.
If they did there'd be no business for tattoo removal.
I so agree. People just don't seem to realize that as they get older their skin is going to sag and wrinkle.
kakieanne is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 25-08-2013, 02:47
Leicester_Hunk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Leicester!!!
Posts: 9,281
Leicester_Hunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 03:36
Eurostar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 41,180
It's one of the ugliest and classless things I've ever seen. It's her body and she can do what she wants with it, but I do think those tattoos are totally horrendous.
It's revolting....it's like something a B-grade porn star would get done.
Eurostar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 06:44
NX-74205
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,287
It's revolting....it's like something a B-grade porn star would get done.

...and is that something that you're qualified in judging?
NX-74205 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 07:55
Satnavvy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,969
I'd love to sniff her roses
Satnavvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 08:04
JasonWatkins
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 38,590
I look at that picture and wonder what kind of modesty does she think she's retaining by the choice of underwear ?
JasonWatkins is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 08:54
Harry Redknapp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: hiding from the taxman
Posts: 2,787
Well nadine took headlines with her pregnancy lately, maybe cheryl was getting desperate because she has become somewhat irrelevant?

Is there any reason why she published such a shot?

Also kids are being gassed in syria, any reason why cheryl's ass is a priority news item?
Harry Redknapp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 09:02
multisync
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 352
Well nadine took headlines with her pregnancy lately, maybe cheryl was getting desperate because she has become somewhat irrelevant?

Is there any reason why she published such a shot?

Also kids are being gassed in syria, any reason why cheryl's ass is a priority news item?
Any reason you're posting on a showbiz forum rather than out there helping the kids in Syria?
multisync is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 09:02
jeff_vader
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 798
All those wrinklies with tats in 30+ years time probably means it's not going to be that big a deal.

Aesthetically seems a bit naff, but YMMV.

The only thought that popped into my head was clearly ms c can't appreciate it (except in a mirror), so who's the (un)lucky person who has to gaze upon that image whilst in the throes of carnal desire?
jeff_vader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 09:17
JasonWatkins
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 38,590
any reason why cheryl's ass is a priority news item?
it's in the 'femail' section of the paper and far removed from front page headlines so you'd kind of have to go looking for it if you particularly wanted to be outraged ..
JasonWatkins is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 09:28
Tweacle Tart II
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,154
I hate tattoos anyway but this one is particularly vile and if she's already having tattoos to cover previous ones then I would suggest she's maybe a bit too fickle for a horrific monster like that on her arse. In those pictures on the final tour, it just looks like half of her body is disfigured because it's so big

As I've said before, I understand that I'm in a minority these days because I don't have one but I am totally happy with that.
Tweacle Tart II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 09:32
Squealer_Mahony
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,744
I havent studied the tatt in detail but surely she would have had to have had a naked bum at some point? Which leads me to wonder just what else the tattooist may have seen.
I'm wondering what would have happened if she needed to fart, if she clenched up it could have wrecked the whole thing so would she let rip in his face or what.
Squealer_Mahony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 09:34
Squealer_Mahony
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,744
All those wrinklies with tats in 30+ years time probably means it's not going to be that big a deal.

Aesthetically seems a bit naff, but YMMV.

The only thought that popped into my head was clearly ms c can't appreciate it (except in a mirror), so who's the (un)lucky person who has to gaze upon that image whilst in the throes of carnal desire?
I'm guessing some sort of garden enthusiast who dreams of shagging some sort of mystical being who appeared in his rose bushes on a full moon after he fertilized the ground himself...
Squealer_Mahony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 09:41
Harry Redknapp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: hiding from the taxman
Posts: 2,787
it's in the 'femail' section of the paper and far removed from front page headlines so you'd kind of have to go looking for it if you particularly wanted to be outraged ..
Its the main news on the sun... so >>>>>>>>>>


Any reason you're posting on a showbiz forum rather than out there helping the kids in Syria?
I don't know why I'm entertaining your stupid ass comment, but here goes... maybe the reason I'm posting here is because I want to?

.Furthermore, you know nothing about what I've done to try to help the Syrian kids. Unless you know that I'm doing nothing, keep it cute and stay mute.
Harry Redknapp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 10:07
Keyser Soze
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 16,093
I'm guessing some sort of garden enthusiast who dreams of shagging some sort of mystical being who appeared in his rose bushes on a full moon after he fertilized the ground himself...
Or someone dressed as a giant bumble bee...
Keyser Soze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 10:11
Squealer_Mahony
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,744
Or someone dressed as a giant bumble bee...
I love it! A guy with bee stripes tattooed on this mister would do as well
Squealer_Mahony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 10:12
Blondie X
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kent but ex Sarf London
Posts: 17,263
I hate tattoos anyway but this one is particularly vile and if she's already having tattoos to cover previous ones then I would suggest she's maybe a bit too fickle for a horrific monster like that on her arse. In those pictures on the final tour, it just looks like half of her body is disfigured because it's so big

As I've said before, I understand that I'm in a minority these days because I don't have one but I am totally happy with that.
I'm with you. I absolutely hate tattoos and always have but this one is just hideous beyond words. She's a good looking woman and I just can not begin to understand why she's done that to herself.
Blondie X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 10:27
CravenHaven
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: wood with Susanna Reid
Posts: 3,396
Why can't she just pretend she is another race like respectable pop star royalty?
I will always be here to water her roses for her when she's on holiday.
CravenHaven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 10:32
Cantona07
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 51,529
I think it looks hot. I love girls with tattoos.

However she needs to extend it further up her back otherwise the placement is all wrong.

Im a guy with a lot of tattoos and while i dont have to defend the art and i dont mind if people hate them i do find the "what will it look like in 30 years time" comments to be a bit silly. No one looks like they did 30 years ago. When im 75 i will be worrying about not peeing the bed and hoping im still a fully functioning human being. If my tattoos look poor on my saggy skin thats fine cos saggy skin aint all that anyway. I can live with it., im sure she can too.
Cantona07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 11:01
solare
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,035
@ Cantona07 - but don't you worry you will tire of seeing the same design every day for the rest of your life? Taste changes so much over a lifetime. A tattoo the size of Cheryl's would be so much work to remove, if she hated it in 5 years.
solare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 11:02
agrainofsand
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,864
It looks totally ridiculous.

Just vile.
agrainofsand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 11:19
derek500
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 17,699
Im a guy with a lot of tattoos and while i dont have to defend the art and i dont mind if people hate them i do find the "what will it look like in 30 years time" comments to be a bit silly. No one looks like they did 30 years ago.
Thank goodness. If I look at my wedding photos from 1978 I look a complete tit!

Luckily, my hair style and the suit I was wearing weren't permanent features and they've changed with the times.

Fashions change. Tattoos are a fashion, but they're permanent.
derek500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 11:20
Cantona07
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 51,529
@ Cantona07 - but don't you worry you will tire of seeing the same design every day for the rest of your life? Taste changes so much over a lifetime. A tattoo the size of Cheryl's would be so much work to remove, if she hated it in 5 years.
But thats life. You make decisions and live with them. Im 34 now and i have a full sleeve down one arm and 6 tattoos on the other. I LOVE them. At the risk of being silly they are a part of me. I have a tattoo on both hands. It hasnt held me back one iota. I hold down a pretty good job.

Even already i look back on them and remember how and why i got them. Its a cool thing for me.When im 75 and they may be all blotchy or whatever i will still look on them fondly and remember where i was and why i got them done. Its a nice thing.

I dont ask for your approval and im sure Cheryl Cole doesnt either but its a personal choice. My closest mates dont like tattoos and say "he's off again" when i go to get one. My last girlfriend rolled her eyes a bit but quite liked them. Its ok. Its ok to dislike them and say its not for you. Its pretty harsh to judge someone by them though.
Cantona07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 11:23
Cantona07
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 51,529
Thank goodness. If I look at my wedding photos from 1978 I look a complete tit!

Luckily, my hair style and the suit I was wearing weren't permanent features and they've changed with the times.

Fashions change. Tattoos are a fashion, but they're permanent.
They are a fashion for some people.

I got my first tattoo in 1998. I dont think i was following fashion back then.

You have to decide for yourself how much you want a tattoo and of course they are permanent.

As thick as people make out this girl is, im sure she knows just how permanent it is. Also given that she makes money from being considered hot and having a good body i have no doubt she has thought about it more than most.
Cantona07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2013, 11:28
mounty
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,224
nice bum
mounty is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:17.