Options

Pyramids Of Mars

2»

Comments

  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 2
    Forum Member
    On watch tomorrow at 2.30 as the tom baker choice
  • Options
    Michael_EveMichael_Eve Posts: 14,460
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    It was 1987 or 8, and I was 15/16 going through a "sh*t I'm approaching adulthood but I still feel like a kid" phase, and I'd talked to my mum and dad about my earliest memories, and Doctor Who was a surprisingly large part of them. So they bought me the VHS of this for Christmas, and it was perfect. Because I had two younger sisters (who I adore) who also had videos, I couldn't watch it all on Christmas Day, but I watched the classic Tom titles, and that was enough for me. Brilliant.

    Boring personal stories aside, it's a brilliant piece of minimum-people, maximum-atmosphere that Doctor Who did so well at that time (still does, given chance - loved Midnight). Gabriel Woolf is fantastically menacing. Much as I love TIP/TSP, a bit of me was still disappointed when the big bad wasn't actually Sutekh.

    That's not boring. Love hearing stories like that!

    This was the first 'proper' Doctor Who video I owned, which was a present too. (I'd seen fuzzy stuff from various sources, if you get my drift, so the picture quality was quite a step up!)

    Watched the heck out of it...wonderful story. Certainly one of Tom's best performances. The scene where he just pushes away Michael Sheard's characters corpse and Sarah loses it with him...brilliant. A real insight into the alien-ness of the Doctor and the fact that he has to have the 'big picture' in mind...just great stuff.
  • Options
    spiney2spiney2 Posts: 27,058
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    i found the weird mix of king tut's curse and supposed "pyramid on mars" very incongruous and not a good story. but everyone else seems to like it.

    the design was good. some trouble was taken with the sets.
  • Options
    Ed SizzersEd Sizzers Posts: 2,671
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    It's hard to find any fault with the story.
    I think the end is a bit disappointing. After all that faffing about and murder and trips to Mars, the Doc' saves the day by getting a doohickey of convenience out of the Tardis. And the whole 2 minutes 'time factor' is a little moot when you've got a Time Machine. They could have stopped off in Starbucks for a Latte and still sent Sutekh into CSOblivion!
  • Options
    Dr2PatDr2Pat Posts: 420
    Forum Member
    CELT1987 wrote: »
    One who has a hand under the chair holding his cushion.

    I remember I was on GB after The Name of the Doctor had transmitted, they created a wonderful thread called the "Photoshop Clara into every story ever" thread full of images of Clara in classic stories.

    One such picture is that it's Clara's hand holding the cushion, which I thought, whoever came up with that is just a genius.
    Scroll down on the link below, if you can, it's post number 15

    http://gallifreybase.com/forum/showthread.php?t=169154
  • Options
    shortcrustshortcrust Posts: 1,546
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    A little bump for the Watch transmission on now. I love this story! First saw it when my dad rented (yes, rented!) it for me in the mid 80s when I off school after an operation. The 70s titles and the old Tardis interior blew my mind! In a way the kids of today miss out by being able to see everything anytime they want to. Glimpses of history were magical and mysterious back then.

    I nagged my parents to buy it for me. Doctor Who videos cost £24.99 at the time so a huge amount for nagging was required.:D
  • Options
    Muttley76Muttley76 Posts: 97,888
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    i'm watching it right now :)
  • Options
    shortcrustshortcrust Posts: 1,546
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Muttley76 wrote: »
    i'm watching it right now :)

    :) Not often you can watch classic Who in the knowledge that other fans are watching too!
  • Options
    JethrykJethryk Posts: 1,355
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    shortcrust wrote: »
    A little bump for the Watch transmission on now. I love this story! First saw it when my dad rented (yes, rented!) it for me in the mid 80s when I off school after an operation. The 70s titles and the old Tardis interior blew my mind! In a way the kids of today miss out by being able to see everything anytime they want to. Glimpses of history were magical and mysterious back then.

    I nagged my parents to buy it for me. Doctor Who videos cost £24.99 at the time so a huge amount for nagging was required.:D

    I love this story, easily my favourite Doctor Who story of them all.

    I think we must be of similar ages. I have a similar story, only it's my brother renting it when he was off school. He held onto it excitedly for the whole day waiting for me to get back from school to watch it. He knew it was my favourite, I'd read it to him a year or so earlier.

    He's no longer with us, so this story also makes me remember him, another reason why it's my favourite.
  • Options
    shortcrustshortcrust Posts: 1,546
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    Jethryk wrote: »
    I love this story, easily my favourite Doctor Who story of them all.

    I think we must be of similar ages. I have a similar story, only it's my brother renting it when he was off school. He held onto it excitedly for the whole day waiting for me to get back from school to watch it. He knew it was my favourite, I'd read it to him a year or so earlier.

    He's no longer with us, so this story also makes me remember him, another reason why it's my favourite.

    Thanks for sharing such a genuinely touching story:).
  • Options
    daveyboy7472daveyboy7472 Posts: 16,416
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Ed Sizzers wrote: »
    I think the end is a bit disappointing. After all that faffing about and murder and trips to Mars, the Doc' saves the day by getting a doohickey of convenience out of the Tardis. And the whole 2 minutes 'time factor' is a little moot when you've got a Time Machine. They could have stopped off in Starbucks for a Latte and still sent Sutekh into CSOblivion!

    Yes, he could have used the TARDIS, but even in those days where it seemed to be more reliable, it could still be unreliable!

    With a Time Machine like that, would you want to risk leaving the fate of the world to chance it may choose that moment to appear somewhere else?!

    :D
  • Options
    Muttley76Muttley76 Posts: 97,888
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    My favourite bit in this is when Sutekh does his "and I find it good" speech. It's spine chilling. :D
  • Options
    radcliffe95radcliffe95 Posts: 4,086
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    A couple of questions:
    Why does Sarah Jane claim to be from 1980?
    Why isn't Michael Sheard in the credits at the end?
  • Options
    JethrykJethryk Posts: 1,355
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    A couple of questions:
    Why does Sarah Jane claim to be from 1980?
    Why isn't Michael Sheard in the credits at the end?

    1) That's when she's from! I know, it's confusing, maybe she was being approximate. See UNIT dating for more info.

    2) It was an omnibus. I didn't look at end titles but I suspect they used the credits from the last episode, which he wasn't in.
  • Options
    Pink KnightPink Knight Posts: 24,773
    Forum Member
    ✭✭✭
    A brilliant story with a slightly underwhelming ending. It would be just in my top ten.
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 67
    Forum Member
    Coincedence, but I'm up to this in my rewatch now - it's cool it's airing on watch, are they showing the odd serial? I've a question about this though, in part 2 they go into the TARDIS and Four shows SJ the 'future' 1980 if Sutekh was left to go all out, but how can they go back like they do, by leaving 1911 does that not sort of seal that Sutekh does go all out as he wasn't stopped? Or am I just brain-frazzled after a crazy day at work.
  • Options
    CorwinCorwin Posts: 16,607
    Forum Member
    ✭✭
    Coincedence, but I'm up to this in my rewatch now - it's cool it's airing on watch, are they showing the odd serial? I've a question about this though, in part 2 they go into the TARDIS and Four shows SJ the 'future' 1980 if Sutekh was left to go all out, but how can they go back like they do, by leaving 1911 does that not sort of seal that Sutekh does go all out as he wasn't stopped? Or am I just brain-frazzled after a crazy day at work.

    If they leave and don't go back then yes Sutekh wins and destroys the Earth, leaving and then returning to the same moment is just the same as them not leaving so they still have a chance to stop Sutekh.


    BIB
    One from each Doctor (on Sat and Sundays)
Sign In or Register to comment.